| Literature DB >> 26743236 |
Li Liu1,2, Yuchen Liu3, Tianbiao Zhang4, Hanwei Wu5, Muqi Lin6, Chaoliang Wang7, Yonghao Zhan8,9, Qing Zhou10, Baoping Qiao11, Xiaojuan Sun12, Qiaoxia Zhang13, Xiaoqiang Guo14, Guoping Zhao15,16, Weixing Zhang17, Weiren Huang18,19.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The synthetic biology technology which enhances the specificity and efficacy of treatment is a novel try in biomedical therapy during recent years. A high frequency of somatic mutations was shown in the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) promoter in bladder cancer, indicating that a mutational hTERT promoter might be a tumor-specific element for bladder cancer therapy. In our study, we aimed to construct a synthetic combination module driven by a super artificial hTERT promoter and to investigate its influence on the malignant phenotypes of bladder cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26743236 PMCID: PMC4705585 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-015-0279-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 0392-9078
Related sequences in the modules
| Name | Related sequences |
|---|---|
| Wild-type hTERT promoter | GGCCCCTCCC TCGGGTTACC CCACAGCCTA GGCCGATTCG ACCTCTCTCC GCTGGGGCCC TCGCTGGCGT CCCTGCACCC TGGGAGCGCG AGCGGCGCGC GGGCGGGGAA GCGCGGCCCA GACCCCCGGG TCCGCCCGGA GCAGCTGCGC TGTCGGGGCC AGGCCGGGCT CCCAGTGGAT TCGCGGGCAC AGACGCCCAG GACCGCGCTC CCCACGTGGC GGAGGGACTG GGGACCCGGG CACCCGTCCT GCCCCTTCAC CTTCCAGCTC CGCCTCCTCC GCGCGGACCC CGCCCCGTCC CGACCCCTCC CGGGTCCCCG GCCCAGCCCC CTCCGGGCCC TCCCAGCCCC TCCCCTTCCT TTCCGCGGCC CCGCCCTCTC CTCGCGGCGC GAGTTTCAGG CAGCGCTGCG TCCTGCTGCG CACGTGGGAA GCCCTGGCCC CGGCCACCCC CGCG |
| Artificial hTERT promoter | GGCCCCTCCC TCGGGTTACC CCACAGCCTA GGCCGATTCG ACCTCTCTCC GCTGGGGCCC TCGCTGGCGT CCCTGCACCC TGGGAGCGCG AGCGGCGCGC GGGCGGGGAA GCGCGGCCCA GACCCCCGGG TCCGCCCGGA GCAGCTGCGC TGTCGGGGCC AGGCCGGGCT CCCAGTGGAT TCGCGGGCAC AGACGCCCAG GACCGCGCTC CCCACGTGGC GGAGGGACTG GGGACCCGGG CACCCGTCCT GCCCCTTCAC CTTCCGGCTC CGCCTCCTCC GCGCGGACCC CGCCCCGTCC CGACCCCTTC CGGGTTTCCG GCCCAGCCCC TTCCGGGCCC TCCCAGCCCC TCCCCTTCCT TTCCGGGGCC CCGCCCTCTC CTCGCGGCGC GAGTTTCCGG CAGCGCTGCG TCCTGCTGCG CACGTGGGAA GCCCTGGCCC CGGCCACCCC CGCG |
| Bax | CACCATGGACGGGTC CGGGGAGCAG CCCAGAGGCG GGGGGCCCAC CAGCTCTGAG CAGATCATGA AGACAGGGGC CCTTTTGCTT CAGGGTTTCA TCCAGGATCG AGCAGGGCGA ATGGGGGGGG AGGCACCCGA GCTGGCCCTG GACCCGGTGC CTCAGGATGC GTCCACCAAG AAGCTGAGCG AGTGTCTCAA GCGCATCGGG GACGAACTGG ACAGTAACAT GGAGCTGCAG AGGATGATTG CCGCCGTGGA CACAGACTCC CCCCGAGAGG TCTTTTTCCG AGTGGCAGCT GACATGTTTT CTGACGGCAA CTTCAACTGG GGCCGGGTTG TCGCCCTTTT CTACTTTGCC AGCAAACTGG TGCTCAAGGC CCTGTGCACC AAGGTGCCGG AACTGATCAG AACCATCATG GGCTGGACAT TGGACTTCCT CCGGGAGCGG CTGTTGGGCT GGATCCAAGA CCAGGGTGGT TGGGTGAGAC TCCTCAAGCC TCCTCACCCC CACCACCGCG CCCTCACCAC CGCCCCTGCC CCACCGTCCC TGCCCCCCGC CACTCCTCTG GGACCCTGGG CCTTCTGGAG CAGGTCACAG TGGTGCCCTC TCCCCATCTT CAGATCATCA GATGTGGTCT ATAATGCGTT TTCCTTACGTGTCTGATTCTAGGCGATCG |
| Anti Bcl2 element | AAGGTATATTGCTGTTGACAGTGAGCGCAGGGAGAUAGUGAUGAAGUAATAGTGAAGCCACAGATGTATTACTTCATCACTATCTCCCTTTGCCTACTGCCTCG |
| Negative control element | AAGGTATATTGCTGTTGACAGTGAGCGCAGCGCAUUCCAGCUUACGUAATAGTGAAGCCACAGATGTATTACGTAAGCTGGAATGCGCTTTGCCTACTGCCTCG |
Fig. 1Design and construction of the artificial hTERT promoter-Bax-Anti Bcl2 combination module. In the cancer cell, the expression level of transcription factor ETS-1 is high and thus the artificial promoter is active. In contrast, ETS-1 is absent and the artificial promoter is inactive in the normal cells. The apoptotic markers can only be activated in the cancer cells which have a high ETS-1 level
Fig. 2Artificial hTERT promoter can drive downstream gene expression efficiently and selectively in bladder cancer cell. Luciferase activity was detected using dual luciferase assay system at 48 h after transfection. The activity of artificial hTERT promoter was significantly higher than that of wild-type hTERT promoter in bladder cancer cells. Nevertheless, both the activity of artificial hTERT promoter and that of wild-type hTERT promoter were weak in NHF. Data are indicated as mean ± S.D.
Fig. 3Silencing ETS-1 inhibited the activity of artificial hTERT promoter in bladder cancer cells. Dual luciferase assay system was used to detect the activity of artificial hTERT promoter at 48 h after transfection. The activity of artificial hTERT promoter in the group co-transfected with ETS-1 shRNA was obviously lower than that in the group co-transfected with negative control shRNA. All data are shown as mean ± S.D.
Fig. 4Artificial hTERT promoter-Bax-Anti Bcl2 combination module selectively restrained cell proliferation in bladder cancer cells. Cell proliferation assay (CCK-8 and MTT) were performed as described in Methods. The cell proliferation was significantly suppressed in bladder cancer 5637 cells (a, c) and T24 cells (b, d) which were transfected with artificial hTERT promoter-Bax-Anti Bcl2 combination module (P < 0.05), compared with negative control group. However, no significant change was shown in NHF (c, e) (P > 0.05). Data are indicated as mean ± S.D.
Fig. 5Artificial hTERT promoter-Bax-Anti Bcl2 combination module selectively induced cell apoptosis in bladder cancer cells. The cell apoptosis changes were determined by caspase-3 ELISA assay and flow cytometry analysis. The relative activity of caspase-3 was increased in bladder cancer 5637 (a) cells and T24 (b) cells treated with artificial hTERT promoter-Bax-Anti Bcl2 combination module. Cell apoptosis induction were also observed in bladder cancer 5637 (d) cells and T24 (e) cells treated with artificial hTERT promoter-Bax-Anti Bcl2 combination module using flow cytometry analysis. Representative images of flow cytometry analysis in bladder cancer 5637 cells (g) and T24 cells (h) were also shown. Nevertheless, there was no obvious difference with the relative activity of caspase-3 (c) and cell apoptosis induction (f, i) between artificial hTERT promoter-Bax-Anti Bcl2 combination module and negative control in NHF. D1, cell debris. D2, non-viable apoptotic cell. D3, normal cells. D4, viable apoptotic cell. All data are presented as mean ± SD