Literature DB >> 26742940

Gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma hENT1-positive: everything was not too bad back when everything seemed worse.

A Orlandi1, M A Calegari2, M Martini3, A Cocomazzi3, C Bagalà2, G Indellicati2, V Zurlo2, M Basso2, A Cassano2, L M Larocca3, C Barone2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: hENT1 is a transmembrane protein which acts as a nucleoside transporter and is the main mediator of Gemcitabine (GEM) uptake into human cells. In this retrospective study we compared GEM versus FOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in which hENT1 evaluation was available.
METHODS: 149 patients affected by unresectable metastatic pancreatic cancer, treated in our institution from 2009 to 2013, have been screened for inclusion in this retrospective study. Seventy patients, treated with GEM or FOLFIRINOX in first-line therapy, fulfilled clinical inclusion criteria for survival analysis. Thirty-one patients were available and contained sufficient quality/quantity RNA for evaluation of hENT1 expression by RT-PCR. The primary endpoint was OS and the secondary endpoint was PFS.
RESULTS: The survival analysis, carried out on 70 patients regardless of hENT1 expression, showed a statistically longer OS and PFS in the group treated with FOLFIRINOX compared to GEM. Within the exploratory analysis, which included 31 patients, no differences were found in hENT1 positive patients treated with FOLFIRINOX compared to GEM in terms of OS (8.5 vs 7 months, HR: 0.89; 95 % CI 0.3-2.5; p = 0.8) and PFS (5.5 vs 5 months, HR: 0.8, 95 % CI 0.2-2.2; p = 0.61). GEM-treated hENT1 positive patients showed a statistically significant improvement both of OS (8 vs 2 months; p = 0.0012) and PFS (5 vs 1 months; p = 0.0004) in comparison to GEM-treated hENT1 negative patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In our exploratory analysis GEM seems as effective as FOLFIRINOX in terms of survival with a better safety profile in hENT1 positive metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FOLFIRINOX; Gemcitabine; Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma; hENT1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26742940     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-015-1471-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  18 in total

1.  Gene expression levels as predictive markers of outcome in pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hayato Fujita; Kenoki Ohuchida; Kazuhiro Mizumoto; Soichi Itaba; Tetsuhide Ito; Kohei Nakata; Jun Yu; Tadashi Kayashima; Ryota Souzaki; Tatsuro Tajiri; Tatsuya Manabe; Takao Ohtsuka; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Gemcitabine transport in xenopus oocytes expressing recombinant plasma membrane mammalian nucleoside transporters.

Authors:  J R Mackey; S Y Yao; K M Smith; E Karpinski; S A Baldwin; C E Cass; J D Young
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-11-03       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Levels of gemcitabine transport and metabolism proteins predict survival times of patients treated with gemcitabine for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Raphaël Maréchal; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; John R Mackey; Cécile Dalban; Pieter Demetter; Kathryn Graham; Anne Couvelard; Magali Svrcek; Armelle Bardier-Dupas; Pascal Hammel; Alain Sauvanet; Christophe Louvet; François Paye; Philippe Rougier; Christophe Penna; Thierry André; Charles Dumontet; Carol E Cass; Lars Petter Jordheim; Eva-Laure Matera; Jean Closset; Isabelle Salmon; Jacques Devière; Jean-François Emile; Jean-Luc Van Laethem
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  The absence of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 is associated with reduced survival in patients with gemcitabine-treated pancreas adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jennifer Spratlin; Randeep Sangha; Darryl Glubrecht; Laith Dabbagh; James D Young; Charles Dumontet; Carol Cass; Raymond Lai; John R Mackey
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Transcription analysis of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 predicts survival in pancreas cancer patients treated with gemcitabine.

Authors:  Elisa Giovannetti; Mario Del Tacca; Valentina Mey; Niccola Funel; Sara Nannizzi; Sergio Ricci; Cinzia Orlandini; Ugo Boggi; Daniela Campani; Marco Del Chiaro; Mauro Iannopollo; Generoso Bevilacqua; Franco Mosca; Romano Danesi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Combined analysis of intratumoral human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) and ribonucleotide reductase regulatory subunit M1 (RRM1) expression is a powerful predictor of survival in patients with pancreatic carcinoma treated with adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy after operative resection.

Authors:  Naoya Nakagawa; Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Takeshi Sudo; Yasushi Hashimoto; Naru Kondo; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine.

Authors:  Daniel D Von Hoff; Thomas Ervin; Francis P Arena; E Gabriela Chiorean; Jeffrey Infante; Malcolm Moore; Thomas Seay; Sergei A Tjulandin; Wen Wee Ma; Mansoor N Saleh; Marion Harris; Michele Reni; Scot Dowden; Daniel Laheru; Nathan Bahary; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Josep Tabernero; Manuel Hidalgo; David Goldstein; Eric Van Cutsem; Xinyu Wei; Jose Iglesias; Markus F Renschler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 and Notch3 can predict gemcitabine effects in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  K Eto; H Kawakami; M Kuwatani; T Kudo; Y Abe; S Kawahata; A Takasawa; M Fukuoka; Y Matsuno; M Asaka; N Sakamoto
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Randomized, multicenter, phase II study of CO-101 versus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: including a prospective evaluation of the role of hENT1 in gemcitabine or CO-101 sensitivity.

Authors:  Elizabeth Poplin; Harpreet Wasan; Lindsey Rolfe; Mitch Raponi; Tone Ikdahl; Ihor Bondarenko; Irina Davidenko; Volodymyr Bondar; August Garin; Stefan Boeck; Steffen Ormanns; Volker Heinemann; Claudio Bassi; T R Jeffrey Evans; Roland Andersson; Hejin Hahn; Vince Picozzi; Adam Dicker; Elaina Mann; Cynthia Voong; Paramjit Kaur; Jeff Isaacson; Andrew Allen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  9 in total

1.  Cytotoxic effects of gemcitabine-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles in pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Kevin O Affram; Taylor Smith; Edward Ofori; Sunil Krishnan; Patrick Underwood; Jose G Trevino; Edward Agyare
Journal:  J Drug Deliv Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.981

2.  FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Retrospective and Phase II Studies.

Authors:  Stephane Thibodeau; Ioannis A Voutsadakis
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa-mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin inhibits pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and induces apoptosis via the EGFR pathway and caspase signaling.

Authors:  Xi Cheng; Bingrui Wang; Zhijian Jin; Ding Ma; Weiping Yang; Ren Zhao; Xiaoqian Jing; Baiyong Shen; Chenghong Peng; Weihua Qiu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-11-22

Review 4.  Chemoresistance in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Siyuan Zeng; Marina Pöttler; Bin Lan; Robert Grützmann; Christian Pilarsky; Hai Yang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Mirogabalin vs pregabalin for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in pancreatic cancer patients.

Authors:  Mitsuru Sugimoto; Tadayuki Takagi; Rei Suzuki; Naoki Konno; Hiroyuki Asama; Yuki Sato; Hiroki Irie; Yoshinori Okubo; Jun Nakamura; Mika Takasumi; Minami Hashimoto; Tsunetaka Kato; Ryoichiro Kobashi; Takuto Hikichi; Hiromasa Ohira
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 6.  Attempts to remodel the pathways of gemcitabine metabolism: Recent approaches to overcoming tumours with acquired chemoresistance.

Authors:  Yuriko Saiki; Shuto Hirota; Akira Horii
Journal:  Cancer Drug Resist       Date:  2020-10-12

7.  Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma experiencing disease progression on FOLFIRINOX.

Authors:  Victor Hugo Fonseca de Jesus; Marcos Pedro Guedes Camandaroba; Mauro Daniel Spina Donadio; Audrey Cabral; Thiago Pimentel Muniz; Luciana de Moura Leite; Lucas Ferreira Sant'Ana
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-10

Review 8.  Overcoming tumor cell chemoresistance using nanoparticles: lysosomes are beneficial for (stearoyl) gemcitabine-incorporated solid lipid nanoparticles.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Yuanqiang Zheng; Yanchun Shi; Zhengrong Cui
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-01-09

Review 9.  The role of FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Beilei Zhang; Fengyan Zhou; Jiaze Hong; Derry Minyao Ng; Tong Yang; Xinyu Zhou; Jieyin Jin; Feifei Zhou; Ping Chen; Yunbao Xu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 2.754

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.