Literature DB >> 2674191

Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections by cell culture and two enzyme immunoassays detecting different chlamydial antigens.

J Mahony1, S Castriciano, J Sellors, I Stewart, I Cunningham, S Landis, W Seidelman, L Grant, C Devlin, M Chernesky.   

Abstract

The enzyme-amplified immunoassay IDEIA (CellTech Diagnostics), which measures lipopolysaccharide antigen, and Chlamydiazyme (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill.), which measures several antigenic components of Chlamydia trachomatis, were compared for specimens from urethral swabs from 235 men attending a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases (culture prevalence of 14.9%) and 458 endocervical swabs from women attending planned parenthood and obstetrics-gynecology clinics (culture prevalences of 5.9 and 7.7%, respectively). Compared with cell culture, the percent sensitivites, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values for IDEIA were 62.5, 99.5, 95.2, and 94.3%, respectively, for specimens from men and 96.3, 97.9, 74.3, and 99.8%, respectively, for specimens from women; results for Chlamydiazyme for specimens from men were 81.8, 99.5, 96.4, and 97.1%, respectively, and for specimens from women, results were 85.2, 99.3, 88.5, and 99.1%, respectively. Although the specificities of IDEIA and Chlamydiazyme were comparable, the sensitivity of IDEIA appeared higher for women (96.3%) than for men (67.5%), while the sensitivities of Chlamydiazyme were similar for men (81.8%) and women (85.2%). Western blot (immunoblot) analysis of the detector reagents from the two immunoassays indicated that the differences in performance observed for the two immunoassays may be due to measurement of different antigens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2674191      PMCID: PMC267712          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.27.9.1934-1938.1989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of chlamydiazyme for the detection of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  L V Howard; P F Coleman; B J England; J E Herrmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of enzyme immunoassays and cell culture for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  K C Mohanty; J J O'Neill; M H Hambling
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1986-06

3.  Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in homosexual men.

Authors:  M Z Sulaiman; J Foster; S F Pugh
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1987-06

4.  Comparison of two enzyme immunoassays and an immunofluorescence test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  L Grillner; S Beckman; H Hammar
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assays in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: how valid are they?

Authors:  E Weismeier; D A Bruckner; C K Malotte; L Manduke
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  Enzyme amplified immunoassay: a novel technique applied to direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.

Authors:  S F Pugh; R C Slack; E O Caul; I D Paul; P N Appleton; S Gatley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens by enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence in genital specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; J B Mahony; S Castriciano; M Mores; I O Stewart; S J Landis; W Seidelman; E J Sargeant; C Leman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.226

  7 in total
  13 in total

1.  Confirmatory polymerase chain reaction testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic and symptomatic men.

Authors:  J B Mahony; K E Luinstra; J W Sellors; D Jang; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Preliminary evaluation of "Clearview Chlamydia" for the rapid detection of chlamydial antigen in cervical secretions.

Authors:  H Young; A Moyes; H Lough; I W Smith; J G McKenna; C Thompson
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-04

3.  Comparison of IDEIA III and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.

Authors:  W D Lebar; H Schubiner; C Jemal; B R Herschman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; C L Murray; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  TO STUDY INCIDENCE OF CHLAMYDIAL GENITAL TRACT INFECTIONS USING ENZYME IMMUNO ASSAY-ANTIGEN DETECTION AND CELL CULTURE METHODS.

Authors:  Y Chander; A Talwar; A Nagendra; A K Praharaj; R K Sharma; V C Ohri
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

6.  Comparison of a polymer conjugate-enhanced enzyme immunoassay to ligase chain reaction for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical swabs.

Authors:  M Chernesky; D Jang; D Copes; J Patel; A Petrich; K Biers; A Sproston; J Kapala
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Diagnosis and assessment of trachoma.

Authors:  Anthony W Solomon; Rosanna W Peeling; Allen Foster; David C W Mabey
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Comparison of plasmid- and chromosome-based polymerase chain reaction assays for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids.

Authors:  J B Mahony; K E Luinstra; J W Sellors; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Sensitivities of PCR, MicroTrak, ChlamydiaEIA, IDEIA, and PACE 2 for purified Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in urine, peripheral blood, peripheral blood leukocytes, and synovial fluid.

Authors:  J G Kuipers; K Scharmann; J Wollenhaupt; E Nettelnbreker; S Hopf; H Zeidler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of the Clearview Chlamydia test, Chlamydiazyme, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with a low prevalence of infection.

Authors:  M Skulnick; G W Small; A E Simor; D E Low; H Khosid; S Fraser; R Chua
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.