Literature DB >> 26741902

Operational Physical Performance and Fitness in Military Women: Physiological, Musculoskeletal Injury, and Optimized Physical Training Considerations for Successfully Integrating Women Into Combat-Centric Military Occupations.

Bradley C Nindl1, Bruce H Jones1, Stephanie J Van Arsdale2, Karen Kelly3, William J Kraemer4.   

Abstract

This article summarizes presentations from a 2014 United States Department of Defense (DoD) Health Affairs Women in Combat symposium addressing physiological, musculoskeletal injury, and optimized physical training considerations from the operational physical performance section. The symposium was held to provide a state-of-the-science meeting on the U.S. DoD's rescinding of the ground combat exclusion policy opening up combat-centric occupations to women. Physiological, metabolic, body composition, bone density, cardiorespiratory fitness, and thermoregulation differences between men and women were briefly reviewed. Injury epidemiological data are presented within military training and operational environments demonstrating women to be at a higher risk for musculoskeletal injuries than men. Physical training considerations for improved muscle strength and power, occupational task performance, load carriage were also reviewed. Particular focus of this article was given to translating physiological and epidemiological findings from the literature on these topics toward actionable guidance and policy recommendations for military leaders responsible for military physical training doctrine: (1) inclusion of resistance training with special emphasis on strength and power development (i.e., activation of high-threshold motor units and recruitment of type II high-force muscle fibers), upper-body strength development, and heavy load carriage, (2) moving away from "field expediency" as the major criteria for determining military physical training policy and training implementation, (3) improvement of load carriage ability with emphasis placed on specific load carriage task performance, combined with both resistance and endurance training, and (4) providing greater equipment resources, coaching assets, and increased training time dedicated to physical readiness training. Reprint &
Copyright © 2016 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26741902     DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  9 in total

1.  A Comparison of United States Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test and Combat Fitness Test Results.

Authors:  Marc Keefer; Mark Debeliso
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

2.  Chronic Pain in Spanish Wildland Firefighters.

Authors:  Fabio García-Heras; Jorge Gutiérrez-Arroyo; Patxi León-Guereño; Belén Carballo-Leyenda; Jose A Rodríguez-Marroyo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Significantly Increased Odds of Reporting Previous Shoulder Injuries in Female Marines Based on Larger Magnitude Shoulder Rotator Bilateral Strength Differences.

Authors:  Shawn R Eagle; Chris Connaboy; Bradley C Nindl; Katelyn F Allison
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-02-21

4.  In loco provision of physical therapy services to military firefighters involved in Brumadinho dam disaster.

Authors:  Marcelo von Sperling de Souza; Anna Florence Alves Paulino de Souza; Pollyanna Figueiredo Gomes; Bárbara Brito de Carvalho E Borges; Roseane Marques Ribeiro; Maria Rosália de Faria Moraes
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-02-21

5.  Mechanical Differences between Men and Women during Overground Load Carriage at Self-Selected Walking Speeds.

Authors:  Kane Middleton; Danielle Vickery-Howe; Ben Dascombe; Anthea Clarke; Jon Wheat; Jodie McClelland; Jace Drain
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Resilience, Psychological Stress, Physical Activity, and BMI among United States Air National Guardsmen: The COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Nicole Ligeza; Abigail Larson; Mark DeBeliso
Journal:  J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2022-01-31

7.  A profile of injuries suffered by female soldiers serving in the Australian Army.

Authors:  Ben Schram; Robin Orr; Rodney Pope
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.135

Review 8.  Considerations for Sex-Cognizant Research in Exercise Biology and Medicine.

Authors:  Samia M O'Bryan; Kathleen R Connor; Devin J Drummer; Kaleen M Lavin; Marcas M Bamman
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-06-03

9.  Systematic review of gender differences in the epidemiology and risk factors of exertional heat illness and heat tolerance in the armed forces.

Authors:  Faith Alele; Bunmi Malau-Aduli; Aduli Malau-Aduli; Melissa Crowe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.