Literature DB >> 26741665

High rate of common bile duct stones and postoperative abscess following percutaneous cholecystostomy.

R Furtado1, P Le Page1, G Dunn1, G L Falk1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The short and long-term outcomes in patients managed with percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCY) at a single institution are described.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted for patients treated between February 2000 and November 2012. Patient charts, imaging and biochemical data were reviewed. Patient demographics, presenting clinical features and treatment variables were noted. Outcome variables were length of admission, 30-day mortality, 30-day unplanned readmission, tube dislodgement, abscess formation, subsequent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and surgery, complications after surgery and median overall survival.
RESULTS: PCY was performed for 55 patients for acute cholecystitis where surgical risk was very high. The 30-day readmission rate was 20% (n=11), the 30-day mortality rate was 9% (n=5) and median survival was 59 months (95% confidence interval: 30-88 months). The median follow-up duration was 68 months. Tubes were dislodged in 15 patients (27%) and an abscess occurred after PCY in 5 patients (9%). Subsequent endoscopic common bile duct stone extraction was required in 20 patients (36%). Cholecystectomy was planned in 22 patients and an abscess occurred following the cholecystectomy in 5 (23%).
CONCLUSIONS: Although a PCY is lifesaving, significant morbidity can arise during recovery. This study demonstrates a high rate of choledocholithiasis (44%), tube dislodgement (27%) and postoperative abscess (23%) compared with previous reports.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute cholecystitis; Cholecystectomy; Cholecystostomy; Sepsis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26741665      PMCID: PMC5210469          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  28 in total

1.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  S B Kolla; S Aggarwal; A Kumar; R Kumar; S Chumber; R Parshad; V Seenu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  State of the art in the diagnosis and management of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  R Reiss; A A Deutsch
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.404

3.  Outcome after percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Yun-Cheng Hsieh; Chun-Ku Chen; Chien-Wei Su; Che-Chang Chan; Teh-Ia Huo; Chia-Jen Liu; Wen-Liang Fang; Kuei-Chuan Lee; Han-Chieh Lin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Percutaneous drainage versus emergency cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: does it matter?

Authors:  E Melloul; A Denys; N Demartines; J-M Calmes; M Schäfer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients.

Authors:  A Hamy; J Visset; D Likholatnikov; F Lerat; H Gibaud; B Savigny; J Paineau
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Management of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: contemporary role for cholecystostomy and subsequent cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Bryan C Morse; J Brandon Smith; Richard B Lawdahl; Richard H Roettger
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Identification of risk factors for an unfavorable laparoscopic cholecystectomy course after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  S C Donkervoort; O van Ruler; L M Dijksman; A A van Geloven; E G Pierik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more difficult after a previous endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

Authors:  Jan Siert Kayitsinga Reinders; Dirk Joan Gouma; Joos Heisterkamp; Ellen Tromp; Bert van Ramshorst; Djamila Boerma
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: experience of 45 patients at a US referral center.

Authors:  Michael F Byrne; Paul Suhocki; Robert M Mitchell; Theodore N Pappas; Helen L Stiffler; Paul S Jowell; Malcolm S Branch; John Baillie
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Validation of a combined comorbidity index.

Authors:  M Charlson; T P Szatrowski; J Peterson; J Gold
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous Cholecystostomy: Evidence-Based Current Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Karan Gulaya; Shamit S Desai; Kent Sato
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Image-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Shayeri Roy Choudhury; Pankaj Gupta; Shikha Garg; Naveen Kalra; Mandeep Kang; Manavjit Singh Sandhu
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Surgical outcome of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: Ten years' experience at a tertiary care centre.

Authors:  Szabolcs Ábrahám; Illés Tóth; Ria Benkő; Mária Matuz; Gabriella Kovács; Zita Morvay; András Nagy; Aurél Ottlakán; László Czakó; Zoltán Szepes; Dániel Váczi; András Négyessy; Attila Paszt; Zsolt Simonka; András Petri; György Lázár
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.