| Literature DB >> 26740920 |
Chad Parker Johnson1, Jenifer Juranek2, Paul R Swank2, Larry Kramer2, Charles S Cox2, Linda Ewing-Cobbs2.
Abstract
Pediatric traumatic brain injury often results in significant long-term deficits in mastery of reading ability. This study aimed to identify white matter pathways that, when damaged, predicted reading deficits in children. Based on the dual-route model of word reading, we predicted that integrity of the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus would be related to performance in sight word identification while integrity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus would be related to performance in phonemic decoding. Reading fluency and comprehension were hypothesized to relate to the superior longitudinal fasciculus, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, and cingulum bundle. The connectivity of white matter pathways was used to predict reading deficits in children aged 6 to 16 years with traumatic brain injury (n = 29) and those with orthopedic injury (n = 27) using tract-based spatial statistics. Results showed that children with traumatic brain injury and reduced microstructural integrity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus demonstrated reduced word-reading ability on sight word and phonemic decoding tasks. Additionally, children with traumatic brain injury and microstructural changes involving the cingulum bundle demonstrated reduced reading fluency. Results support the association of a dorsal pathway via the superior longitudinal fasciculus with both sight word reading and phonemic decoding. No association was identified between the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus and sight word reading or phonemic decoding. Reading fluency was associated with the integrity of the cingulum bundle. These findings support dissociable pathways predicting word reading and fluency using Diffusion Tensor Imaging and provide additional information for developing models of acquired reading deficits by specifying areas of brain damage which may predict reading deficits following recovery from the acute phase of TBI.Entities:
Keywords: Diffusion Tensor Imaging; Pediatric; Reading; Traumatic brain injury
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26740920 PMCID: PMC4660156 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.10.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Group differences between orthopedic injury (OI) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) groups.
| Demographics | Orthopedic group | Traumatic brain injury group | Statistics | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 27 | 29 | ||
| Gender (% male) | 56 | 72 | 1.73 | 0.19 |
| Dominant Hand (% right) | 85 | 93 | 0.92 | 0.34 |
| Age at Scan (mean [SD]) | 10.1 [2.71] | 11.8 [2.74] | 2.39 | 0.02 |
| Maternal Education (mean [SD]) | 13.8 [3.65] | 12.8 [4.74] | 0.84 | 0.41 |
| WASI IQ (Mean [SD]) | 107.0 [13.63] | 103.0 [11.57] | 1.19 | 0.24 |
| Injury Severity Score (mean [SD]) | 6.33 [2.54] | 21.62 [10.90] | 7.34 | 0.00 |
| Days From Injury to Scan (mean [SD]) | 115.93 [102.67] | 103.93 [46.25] | 0.57 | 0.57 |
| Days From Injury to Test (mean [SD]) | 374.96 [39.092] | 383.52 [37.829] | − 0.83 | 0.41 |
As classified by the Hollingshead Four Factor Scale (1975).
Injury characteristics from radiological review of the traumatic brain injury (TBI) group.
| Age in years | Imaging findings | Hemisphere | Regions implicated | Encephalomalacia | Shear injuries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Yes | Left | Temporal, parietal, occipital | No | Yes |
| 7 | Yes | Bilateral | Frontal | Yes | Yes |
| 7 | No | ||||
| 8 | No | ||||
| 8 | No | ||||
| 9 | No | ||||
| 9 | No | ||||
| 9 | No | ||||
| 10 | Yes | Bilateral | Extensive | No | Yes |
| 10 | Yes | Bilateral | Frontal | Yes | Yes |
| 10 | Yes | Left | Frontal, parietal | No | Yes |
| 10 | Yes | Left | Extensive | Yes | Yes |
| 11 | No | ||||
| 11 | No | ||||
| 11 | Yes | Bilateral | Extensive | No | Yes |
| 12 | No | ||||
| 12 | Yes | Left | Temporal | Yes | No |
| 12 | No | ||||
| 12 | Yes | Bilateral | Frontal, temporal | Yes | No |
| 13 | No | ||||
| 13 | Yes | Bilateral | Extensive | No | Yes |
| 13 | No | ||||
| 14 | No | ||||
| 14 | Yes | Bilateral | Extensive | No | Yes |
| 15 | No | ||||
| 15 | Yes | Bilateral | Frontal | Yes | No |
| 15 | Yes | Left | Frontal, temporal, parietal | Yes | No |
| 15 | Yes | Bilateral | Extensive | Yes | Yes |
| 16 | Yes | Right | Frontal, parietal | No | Yes |
Fig. 1TBSS Results. White matter skeleton appears in green. The cingulum bundle (pink), superior longitudinal fasciculus (blue), and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (yellow) regions from the Johns Hopkins University atlas are illustrated. Clusters where OI group FA is significantly greater than the TBI group (p < 0.05, multiple comparison correction) appear red. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Group differences on standardized reading measures.
| Reading measures M [SD] | Orthopedic group | Traumatic brain injury group | Statistics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WJ-III Letter-Word | 102.9 [10.06] | 98.7 [11.32] | 1.45 | 0.08 | 0.39 |
| WJ-III Reading Fluency | 103.2 [14.12] | 96.8 [12.72] | 1.65 | 0.05 | 0.44 |
| TOWRE Sight Word | 102.2 [12.54] | 94.1 [12.24] | 2.44 | 0.01 | 0.65 |
| TOWRE Phonemic Decoding | 97.96 [13.91] | 91.55 [12.09] | 1.84 | 0.04 | 0.49 |
| GORT-4 Reading Rate | 10.4 [3.04] | 9.0 [3.08] | 1.72 | 0.05 | 0.46 |
| GORT-4 Reading Accuracy | 9.4 [2.53] | 8.2 [2.77] | 1.64 | 0.05 | 0.44 |
| GORT-4 Reading Comprehension | 10.4 [3.51] | 9.7 [2.65] | 0.82 | 0.21 | 0.22 |
Note: Significance values based on single-tailed t-tests. d = Cohen's d.
Group differences in pathway microstructure after controlling for age.
| DTI Metric | Orthopedic Group | Traumatic brain injury group | Statistics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F(1,53) | |||||
| Cingulum Bundle | 0.528 [0.042] | 0.515 [0.037] | 4.06 | 0.05 | 0.07 |
| Inferior Fronto-Occipital Fasciculus | 0.511 [0.023] | 0.492 [0.027] | 11.61 | < 0.001 | 0.18 |
| Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus | 0.454 [0.020] | 0.445 [0.028] | 4.34 | 0.04 | 0.08 |
| Cingulum Bundle | 0.773 [0.047] | 0.767 [0.029] | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.01 |
| Inferior Fronto-Occipital Fasciculus | 0.814 [0.049] | 0.821 [0.036] | 2.35 | 0.13 | 0.04 |
| Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus | 0.777 [0.057] | 0.780 [0.037] | 2.01 | 0.16 | 0.04 |
General Linear Models of White Matter Pathways Predicting Word Reading.
| WJ-III Letter-Word | TOWRE Sight Word | TOWRE Phonemic Decoding | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictor | F(1, 50) | F(1, 50) | F(1, 50) | ||||||
| Maternal Education | 5.34 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 4.37 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 2.88 | 0.10 | 0.05 |
| Group | 4.28 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 6.64 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 4.31 | 0.04 | 0.07 |
| Inferior Fronto-Occipital | 0.02 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.54 | 0.01 | 0.28 | 0.60 | 0.00 |
| Superior Longitudinal | 0.01 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.75 | 0.00 |
| Group x Superior Longitudinal | 4.07 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 6.03 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 3.93 | 0.05 | 0.07 |
Note: These three models were not corrected for multiple comparisons.
Fig. 2Interaction Effect of Group and Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus Integrity TOWRE sight word and Phonemic Decoding tasks.
General Linear Models of White Matter Pathways Predicting Fluency and Comprehension.
| WJ-III Reading Fluency | GORT4 Fluency | GORT-4 Comprehension | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictor | F(1, 49) | F(1, 49) | F(1, 50) | ||||||
| Maternal education | 3.85 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 4.78 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 6.24 | 0.02 | 0.10 |
| Group | 6.03 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 8.12 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.55 | 0.46 | 0.01 |
| Cingulum | 3.03 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 7.65 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 1.04 | 0.31 | 0.02 |
| Inferior fronto-occipital | 0.63 | 0.43 | 0.01 | 1.45 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 2.59 | 0.11 | 0.04 |
| Superior longitudinal | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.77 | 0.38 | 0.01 | 0.63 | 0.43 | 0.01 |
| Group x cingulum | 5.58 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 7.53 | 0.01 | 0.11 | – | – | – |
Note: these three models were not corrected for multiple comparisons.
Fig. 3Interaction Effect of Group and Cingulum Bundle Integrity on GORT-4 and WJ-III Reading Fluency tasks.