| Literature DB >> 26740789 |
Mehtap Tanyol1, Gülşad Uslu2, Vahap Yönten3.
Abstract
The aim of our research was to explore the most cost-efficient and optimal medium composition for the production of lipase from Pseudomonas fluorescens (NRLL B-2641) culture grown on sunflower oil cake (SuOC) by applying response surface methodology (RSM). The oil cake was used instead of carbon sources. Peptone, ammonium sulphate and the carbon source (SuOC) were the most important factors as it is obligatory for microbial growth. Subsequently, the optimum values for the carbon source, peptone and ammonium sulphate were found to be 11.10% (w/v), 1.18% (w/v) and 0.83% (w/v), respectively. Experiments carried out under optimum conditions revealed a maximum lipase activity of 10.8 U mL-1, which was achieved after 48 h of fermentation. The obtained results were finally verified with batch experiments carried out under the optimum conditions evaluated and it was demonstrated that the SuOC from agro-industrial residue as substrates can be used as an inexpensive base (carbon source) for the production of lipase by P. fluorescens (NRLL B-2641).Entities:
Keywords: Pseudomonas fluorescens; RSM; lipase; optimization; sunflower oil cake
Year: 2014 PMID: 26740789 PMCID: PMC4684071 DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2014.991635
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip ISSN: 1310-2818 Impact factor: 1.632
Coded and actual values of independent factors.
| Coding | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Symbols | −1.682 | −1 | 0 | 1 | +1.682 |
| Carbon source (C) | 5 | 7.03 | 10 | 12.97 | 15 | |
| Peptone (P) | 0.0 | 0.41 | 1 | 1.59 | 2.0 | |
| Ammonium sulphate (AS) | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.0 | |
Parameters, their intervals in the runs conducted in CCD and the corresponding results.
| Run | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 6.13 |
| 2 | 10.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 4.70 |
| 3 | 10.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 8.03 |
| 4 | 10.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 8.10 |
| 5 | 7.03 | 0.41 | 0.80 | 6.93 |
| 6 | 10.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 7.88 |
| 7 | 10.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 7.95 |
| 8 | 7.03 | 1.59 | 0.80 | 10.00 |
| 9 | 7.03 | 1.59 | 0.20 | 5.15 |
| 10 | 12.97 | 0.41 | 0.20 | 4.93 |
| 11 | 10.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.80 |
| 12 | 10.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 7.96 |
| 13 | 12.97 | 1.59 | 0.20 | 6.75 |
| 14 | 7.03 | 0.41 | 0.20 | 3.08 |
| 15 | 10.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 8.03 |
| 16 | 12.97 | 0.41 | 0.80 | 7.85 |
| 17 | 10.00 | 2.00 | 0.50 | 8.40 |
| 18 | 15.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 6.02 |
| 19 | 10.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 7.90 |
| 20 | 12.97 | 1.59 | 0.80 | 10.08 |
ANOVA of second-order polynomial model for the lipase activity obtained through CCD.
| Source | Sum of squares | Degree of freedom | Mean square | Prob > | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 63.58 | 9 | 7.06 | 14.998 | 0.0001 | Significant |
| 1.33 | 1 | 1.33 | 2.8278 | 0.1236 | ||
| 17.39 | 1 | 17.39 | 36.929 | 0.0001 | ||
| 34.83 | 1 | 34.83 | 73.959 | <0.0001 | ||
| 0.14 | 1 | 0.14 | 0.315 | 0.5868 | ||
| 0.75 | 1 | 0.75 | 1.592 | 0.2355 | ||
| 0.24 | 1 | 0.24 | 0.527 | 0.4843 | ||
| 3.73 | 1 | 3.73 | 7.939 | 0.0182 | ||
| 1.68 | 1 | 1.68 | 3.567 | 0.0882 | ||
| 5.05 | 1 | 5.05 | 10.740 | 0.0083 |
Note: R 2 = 0.93.
Figure 1. Response surface plot and the corresponding contour plot representing the effects of carbon source and ammonium sulphate concentration on lipase activity at a fixed peptone concentration of 1.0% (w/v).
Figure 4. Predicted lipase activity versus experimentally observed lipase activity.
Figure 2. Response surface plot and the corresponding contour plot representing the effects of peptone and ammonium sulphate concentration on lipase activity at a fixed carbon source concentration of 10.0% (w/v).
Figure 3. Response surface plot and the corresponding contour plot representing the effects of carbon source and peptone concentration on lipase activity at a fixed ammonium sulphate concentration of 0.5% (w/v).