John V Lavigne1. 1. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, and Mary Ann and J. Milburn Smith Child Health Research Program, Children's Hospital of Chicago Research Center jlavigne@luriechildrens.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This report examined limitations in our ability to assess clinically significant change (CSC) in randomized controlled trials of treatments of self-reported pediatric chronic pain intensity. METHODS: The following were reviewed: (a) approaches to assessing CSC; (b) approaches to assessing CSC used in psychological treatment studies of self-reported pediatric chronic pain intensity included in a recent systematic review; (c) the role of test-retest reliability in distribution-based CSC measures; (d) the test-retest reliability of recommended chronic pain measures. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Existing studies do not assess whether a CSC occurred or use procedures that did not account for measurement error and true score fluctuations unrelated to treatment, possibly resulting in overestimating CSCs. Distribution-based approaches to assessing CSCs that address these problems require knowing test-retest reliability of the chronic pain measure at appropriate intervals. Available information raises concern about our ability to estimate CSC reliably. Recommendations are made for future research.
OBJECTIVE: This report examined limitations in our ability to assess clinically significant change (CSC) in randomized controlled trials of treatments of self-reported pediatric chronic pain intensity. METHODS: The following were reviewed: (a) approaches to assessing CSC; (b) approaches to assessing CSC used in psychological treatment studies of self-reported pediatric chronic pain intensity included in a recent systematic review; (c) the role of test-retest reliability in distribution-based CSC measures; (d) the test-retest reliability of recommended chronic pain measures. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Existing studies do not assess whether a CSC occurred or use procedures that did not account for measurement error and true score fluctuations unrelated to treatment, possibly resulting in overestimating CSCs. Distribution-based approaches to assessing CSCs that address these problems require knowing test-retest reliability of the chronic pain measure at appropriate intervals. Available information raises concern about our ability to estimate CSC reliably. Recommendations are made for future research.
Authors: Laura Simons; Massieh Moayedi; Robert C Coghill; Jennifer Stinson; Martin S Angst; Nima Aghaeepour; Brice Gaudilliere; Christopher D King; Marina López-Solà; Marie-Eve Hoeppli; Emma Biggs; Ed Ganio; Sara E Williams; Kenneth R Goldschneider; Fiona Campbell; Danielle Ruskin; Elliot J Krane; Suellen Walker; Gillian Rush; Marissa Heirich Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Lauren E Harrison; Lauren C Heathcote; Zeena Khazendar; Patricia A Richardson; Laura E Simons Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 3.442