Literature DB >> 26740648

Mild Perceptual Categorization Deficits Follow Bilateral Removal of Anterior Inferior Temporal Cortex in Rhesus Monkeys.

Narihisa Matsumoto1, Mark A G Eldridge2, Richard C Saunders2, Rachel Reoli2, Barry J Richmond3.   

Abstract

In primates, visual recognition of complex objects depends on the inferior temporal lobe. By extension, categorizing visual stimuli based on similarity ought to depend on the integrity of the same area. We tested three monkeys before and after bilateral anterior inferior temporal cortex (area TE) removal. Although mildly impaired after the removals, they retained the ability to assign stimuli to previously learned categories, e.g., cats versus dogs, and human versus monkey faces, even with trial-unique exemplars. After the TE removals, they learned in one session to classify members from a new pair of categories, cars versus trucks, as quickly as they had learned the cats versus dogs before the removals. As with the dogs and cats, they generalized across trial-unique exemplars of cars and trucks. However, as seen in earlier studies, these monkeys with TE removals had difficulty learning to discriminate between two simple black and white stimuli. These results raise the possibility that TE is needed for memory of simple conjunctions of basic features, but that it plays only a small role in generalizing overall configural similarity across a large set of stimuli, such as would be needed for perceptual categorical assignment. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The process of seeing and recognizing objects is attributed to a set of sequentially connected brain regions stretching forward from the primary visual cortex through the temporal lobe to the anterior inferior temporal cortex, a region designated area TE. Area TE is considered the final stage for recognizing complex visual objects, e.g., faces. It has been assumed, but not tested directly, that this area would be critical for visual generalization, i.e., the ability to place objects such as cats and dogs into their correct categories. Here, we demonstrate that monkeys rapidly and seemingly effortlessly categorize large sets of complex images (cats vs dogs, cars vs trucks), surprisingly, even after removal of area TE, leaving a puzzle about how this generalization is done.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/360043-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavior; categorization; generalization; lesion; perception

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26740648      PMCID: PMC4701965          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2058-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  37 in total

Review 1.  Models of object recognition.

Authors:  M Riesenhuber; T Poggio
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  D J Freedman; M Riesenhuber; T Poggio; E K Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-01-12       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex.

Authors:  Natasha Sigala; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Impairments in visual discrimination after perirhinal cortex lesions: testing 'declarative' vs. 'perceptual-mnemonic' views of perirhinal cortex function.

Authors:  Timothy J Bussey; Lisa M Saksida; Elisabeth A Murray
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  A comparison of primate prefrontal and inferior temporal cortices during visual categorization.

Authors:  David J Freedman; Maximilian Riesenhuber; Tomaso Poggio; Earl K Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Some observations on cortical inputs to the macaque monkey amygdala: an anterograde tracing study.

Authors:  Lisa Stefanacci; David G Amaral
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2002-09-30       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 7.  Vision: are models of object recognition catching up with the brain?

Authors:  Tomaso Poggio; Shimon Ullman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Face inversion decreased information about facial identity and expression in face-responsive neurons in macaque area TE.

Authors:  Yasuko Sugase-Miyamoto; Narihisa Matsumoto; Kaoru Ohyama; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  How do rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta) scan faces in a visual paired comparison task?

Authors:  Katalin M Gothard; Cynthia A Erickson; David G Amaral
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-07-09       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Doris Y Tsao; Winrich A Freiwald; Tamara A Knutsen; Joseph B Mandeville; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The Organization and Operation of Inferior Temporal Cortex.

Authors:  Bevil R Conway
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 6.422

2.  Contributions of the Monkey Inferior Temporal Areas TE and TEO to Visual Categorization.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Setogawa; Mark A G Eldridge; Grace P Fomani; Richard C Saunders; Barry J Richmond
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  The visual prefrontal cortex of anthropoids: interaction with temporal cortex in decision making and its role in the making of "visual animals".

Authors:  Mark A G Eldridge; Brendan E Hines; Elisabeth A Murray
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2021-03-10

4.  Perceptual processing in the ventral visual stream requires area TE but not rhinal cortex.

Authors:  Mark Ag Eldridge; Narihisa Matsumoto; John H Wittig; Evan C Masseau; Richard C Saunders; Barry J Richmond
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Local features drive identity responses in macaque anterior face patches.

Authors:  Elena N Waidmann; Kenji W Koyano; Julie J Hong; Brian E Russ; David A Leopold
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 17.694

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.