E Thienpont1, A Vanden Berghe2, P E Schwab2, J P Forthomme3, O Cornu2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Saint Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. emmanuel.thienpont@uclouvain.be. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Saint Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CHU Ambroise Paré, Mons, Belgium.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To utilize the 'Forgotten Joint' Score (FJS), a 12-item questionnaire analysing the ability to forget the joint, for comparing preoperative status in osteoarthritic patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Higher scores represent a better result with a maximum of 100. The hypothesis of this study was that a preoperative difference in favour of hip arthritis could eventually explain why THA is cited more often as a forgotten joint than TKA. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 150 patients with either tricompartmental knee (n = 75) or hip osteoarthritis (n = 75). Patients completed FJS-12 scores preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: A similar preoperative FJS-12 was observed for hip (22 (15)) and knee osteoarthritis (24 (17)) (n.s.). The postoperative FJS-12 score was significantly higher for THA (80 (24)) than for TKA (70 (27)) (p < 0.05). High reliability after 6 weeks was observed for the preoperative FJS-12 test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.87) in TKA. A preoperative floor effect of 15 % in THA and 0 % in TKA was found as well as a postoperative ceiling effect of 33 % in THA and 9 % in TKA. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical relevance of utilizing the FJS-12 as an instrument to evaluate outcome is strongly proposed for knee arthroplasty. In general, one is not aware of a healthy joint during the ADL, and it can therefore be regarded as 'forgotten'. The preoperative FJS-12 Score is a powerful tool to provide patients with clearer insights into their positive evolution after surgery. The use of the FJS-12 in THA is a topic for further research, as this study found that floor and ceiling effects limit its usefulness in studies evaluating clinical outcome in this area. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
PURPOSE: To utilize the 'Forgotten Joint' Score (FJS), a 12-item questionnaire analysing the ability to forget the joint, for comparing preoperative status in osteoarthritic patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Higher scores represent a better result with a maximum of 100. The hypothesis of this study was that a preoperative difference in favour of hip arthritis could eventually explain why THA is cited more often as a forgotten joint than TKA. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 150 patients with either tricompartmental knee (n = 75) or hip osteoarthritis (n = 75). Patients completed FJS-12 scores preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: A similar preoperative FJS-12 was observed for hip (22 (15)) and knee osteoarthritis (24 (17)) (n.s.). The postoperative FJS-12 score was significantly higher for THA (80 (24)) than for TKA (70 (27)) (p < 0.05). High reliability after 6 weeks was observed for the preoperative FJS-12 test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.87) in TKA. A preoperative floor effect of 15 % in THA and 0 % in TKA was found as well as a postoperative ceiling effect of 33 % in THA and 9 % in TKA. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical relevance of utilizing the FJS-12 as an instrument to evaluate outcome is strongly proposed for knee arthroplasty. In general, one is not aware of a healthy joint during the ADL, and it can therefore be regarded as 'forgotten'. The preoperative FJS-12 Score is a powerful tool to provide patients with clearer insights into their positive evolution after surgery. The use of the FJS-12 in THA is a topic for further research, as this study found that floor and ceiling effects limit its usefulness in studies evaluating clinical outcome in this area. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Entities:
Keywords:
Forgotten Joint Score; Hip and knee arthritis; Patient-reported outcome; Total hip arthroplasty; Total knee arthroplasty
Authors: Philip C Noble; Giles R Scuderi; Adam C Brekke; Alla Sikorskii; James B Benjamin; Jess H Lonner; Priya Chadha; Daniel A Daylamani; W Norman Scott; Robert B Bourne Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2006-08-24 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: A J Janse; R J B J Gemke; C S P M Uiterwaal; I van der Tweel; J L L Kimpen; G Sinnema Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Jarod A Richards; Mark D Williams; Neil A Gupta; Joseph M Kitchen; John E Whitaker; Langan S Smith; Arthur L Malkani Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2022-01-08
Authors: Vincent P Galea; Mina A Botros; Rami Madanat; Christian S Nielsen; Charles Bragdon Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Florian Baumann; Johannes Weber; Daniel Mahr; Martin Bäumlein; Maximilian Kerschbaum; Karolina Müller; Paavo Rillmann; Michael Nerlich; Markus Loibl Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2017-12-02 Impact factor: 3.186