Literature DB >> 26737023

A comparison between block and smooth modeling in finite element simulations of tDCS.

Aprinda Indahlastari, Rosalind J Sadleir.   

Abstract

Current density distributions in five selected structures, namely, anterior superior temporal gyrus (ASTG), hippocampus (HIP), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), occipital lobe (OCC) and pre-central gyrus (PRC) were investigated as part of a comparison between electrostatic finite element models constructed directly from MRI-resolution data (block models), and smoothed tetrahedral finite element models (smooth models). Three electrode configurations were applied, mimicking different tDCS therapies. Smooth model simulations were found to require three times longer to complete. The percentage differences between mean and median current densities of each model type in arbitrarily chosen brain structures ranged from -33.33-48.08%. No clear relationship was found between structure volumes and current density differences between the two model types. Tissue regions nearby the electrodes demonstrated the least percentage differences between block and smooth models. Therefore, block models may be adequate to predict current density values in cortical regions presumed targeted by tDCS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26737023      PMCID: PMC5929136          DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  5 in total

1.  Computational models of transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Asif Rahman; Abhishek Datta
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  Simulating transcranial direct current stimulation with a detailed anisotropic human head model.

Authors:  Sumientra M Rampersad; Arno M Janssen; Felix Lucka; Ümit Aydin; Benjamin Lanfer; Seok Lew; Carsten H Wolters; Dick F Stegeman; Thom F Oostendorp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Automated MRI segmentation for individualized modeling of current flow in the human head.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Jacek P Dmochowski; Yuzhuo Su; Abhishek Datta; Christopher Rorden; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS.

Authors:  Toralf Neuling; Sven Wagner; Carsten H Wolters; Tino Zaehle; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Target optimization in transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Rosalind J Sadleir; Tracy D Vannorsdall; David J Schretlen; Barry Gordon
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.157

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Projected current density comparison in tDCS block and smooth FE modeling.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Munish Chauhan; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

2.  Changing head model extent affects finite element predictions of transcranial direct current stimulation distributions.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Munish Chauhan; Benjamin Schwartz; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.