Literature DB >> 28269179

Projected current density comparison in tDCS block and smooth FE modeling.

Aprinda Indahlastari, Munish Chauhan, Rosalind J Sadleir.   

Abstract

Current density distribution and projected current density calculation following transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) forward model in a human head were compared between two modeling pipelines: block and smooth. Block model was directly constructed from MRI voxel resolution and simulated in C. Smooth models underwent a boundary smoothing process by applying recursive Gaussian filters and simulated in COMSOL. Three smoothing levels were added to determine their effects on current density distribution compared to block models. Median current density percentage differences were calculated in anterior superior temporal gyrus (ASTG), hippocampus (HIP), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), occipital lobes (OCC) and precentral gyrus (PRC) and normalized against a baseline value. A maximum of + 20% difference in median current density was found for three standard electrode montages: F3-RS, T7-T8 and Cz-Oz. Furthermore, median current density percentage differences in each montage target brain structures were found to be within + 7%. Higher levels of smoothing increased median current density percentage differences in T7-T8 and Cz-Oz target structures. However, while demonstrating similar trends in each montage, additional smoothing levels showed no clear relationship between their smoothing effects and calculated median current density in the five cortical structures. Finally, relative L2 error in reconstructed projected current density was found to be 17% and 21% for block and smooth pipelines, respectively. Overall, a block model workflow may be a more attractive alternative for simulating tDCS stimulation because involves a shorter modeling time and independence from commercial modeling platforms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28269179      PMCID: PMC5929137          DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  10 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model.

Authors:  Rosalind J Sadleir; Tracy D Vannorsdall; David J Schretlen; Barry Gordon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  In vivo electrical conductivity imaging of a canine brain using a 3 T MREIT system.

Authors:  Hyung Joong Kim; Tong In Oh; Young Tae Kim; Byung Il Lee; Eung Je Woo; Jin Keun Seo; Soo Yeol Lee; Ohin Kwon; Chunjae Park; Byeong Teck Kang; Hee Myung Park
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  Current Density Imaging During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Using DT-MRI and MREIT: Algorithm Development and Numerical Simulations.

Authors:  Oh In Kwon; Saurav Z K Sajib; Igor Sersa; Tong In Oh; Woo Chul Jeong; Hyung Joong Kim; Eung Je Woo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Computational models of transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Asif Rahman; Abhishek Datta
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.843

5.  Simulating transcranial direct current stimulation with a detailed anisotropic human head model.

Authors:  Sumientra M Rampersad; Arno M Janssen; Felix Lucka; Ümit Aydin; Benjamin Lanfer; Seok Lew; Carsten H Wolters; Dick F Stegeman; Thom F Oostendorp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Automated MRI segmentation for individualized modeling of current flow in the human head.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Jacek P Dmochowski; Yuzhuo Su; Abhishek Datta; Christopher Rorden; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  A comparison between block and smooth modeling in finite element simulations of tDCS.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015

8.  A pipeline for the simulation of transcranial direct current stimulation for realistic human head models using SCIRun/BioMesh3D.

Authors:  Moritz Dannhauer; Dana Brooks; Don Tucker; Rob MacLeod
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2012

9.  Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS.

Authors:  Toralf Neuling; Sven Wagner; Carsten H Wolters; Tino Zaehle; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Target optimization in transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Rosalind J Sadleir; Tracy D Vannorsdall; David J Schretlen; Barry Gordon
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.157

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Methods to Compare Predicted and Observed Phosphene Experience in tACS Subjects.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Aditya K Kasinadhuni; Christopher Saar; Kevin Castellano; Bakir Mousa; Munish Chauhan; Thomas H Mareci; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.599

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.