Literature DB >> 26736240

Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS?

Axel Thielscher, Andre Antunes, Guilherme B Saturnino.   

Abstract

Electric field calculations based on numerical methods and increasingly realistic head models are more and more used in research on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS). However, they are still far from being established as standard tools for the planning and analysis in practical applications of TMS. Here, we start by delineating three main challenges that need to be addressed to unravel their full potential. This comprises (i) identifying and dealing with the model uncertainties, (ii) establishing a clear link between the induced fields and the physiological stimulation effects, and (iii) improving the usability of the tools for field calculation to the level that they can be easily used by non-experts. We then introduce a new version of our pipeline for field calculations (www.simnibs.org) that substantially simplifies setting up and running TMS and tDCS simulations based on Finite-Element Methods (FEM). We conclude with a brief outlook on how the new version of SimNIBS can help to target the above identified challenges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26736240     DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  153 in total

1.  Simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation in head model with morphologically-realistic cortical neurons.

Authors:  Aman S Aberra; Boshuo Wang; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy.

Authors:  Luis J Gomez; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Selective modulation of interhemispheric connectivity by transcranial alternating current stimulation influences binaural integration.

Authors:  Basil C Preisig; Lars Riecke; Matthias J Sjerps; Anne Kösem; Benjamin R Kop; Bob Bramson; Peter Hagoort; Alexis Hervais-Adelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Non-Invasive Neuromodulation Using Time-Varying Caloric Vestibular Stimulation.

Authors:  Robert D Black; Lesco L Rogers; Kristen K Ade; Heather A Nicoletto; Heather D Adkins; Daniel T Laskowitz
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.316

5.  Design of NIRS Probe Based on Computational Model to Find Out the Optimal Location for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Neurocognitive Effects of Combined Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) and Venlafaxine in Geriatric Depression: Phase 1 of the PRIDE Study.

Authors:  Sarah H Lisanby; Shawn M McClintock; George Alexopoulos; Samuel H Bailine; Elisabeth Bernhardt; Mimi C Briggs; C Munro Cullum; Zhi-De Deng; Mary Dooley; Emma T Geduldig; Robert M Greenberg; Mustafa M Husain; Styliani Kaliora; Rebecca G Knapp; Vassilios Latoussakis; Lauren S Liebman; William V McCall; Martina Mueller; Georgios Petrides; Joan Prudic; Peter B Rosenquist; Matthew V Rudorfer; Shirlene Sampson; Abeba A Teklehaimanot; Kristen G Tobias; Richard D Weiner; Robert C Young; Charles H Kellner
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 4.105

7.  Systematic examination of low-intensity ultrasound parameters on human motor cortex excitability and behavior.

Authors:  Anton Fomenko; Kai-Hsiang Stanley Chen; Jean-François Nankoo; James Saravanamuttu; Yanqiu Wang; Mazen El-Baba; Xue Xia; Shakthi Sanjana Seerala; Kullervo Hynynen; Andres M Lozano; Robert Chen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Cerebellar Theta and Beta Noninvasive Stimulation Rhythms Differentially Influence Episodic Memory versus Semantic Prediction.

Authors:  Shruti Dave; Stephen VanHaerents; Joel L Voss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Medial prefrontal cortex involvement in aesthetic appreciation of paintings: a tDCS study.

Authors:  Zaira Cattaneo; Chiara Ferrari; Susanna Schiavi; Ivan Alekseichuk; Andrea Antal; Marcos Nadal
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-10-21

10.  Comparative performance of the finite element method and the boundary element fast multipole method for problems mimicking transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

Authors:  Aung Thu Htet; Guilherme B Saturnino; Edward H Burnham; Gregory M Noetscher; Aapo Nummenmaa; Sergey N Makarov
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.