Literature DB >> 26734966

Risk Factors for Nonclosure of a Temporary Defunctioning Ileostomy Following Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer.

Hong-Da Pan1, Yi-Fan Peng, Lin Wang, Ming Li, Yun-Feng Yao, Jun Zhao, Tian-Cheng Zhan, Jin Gu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with colorectal cancer, a defunctioning ileostomy is commonly constructed to reduce anastomotic complications. However, many patients do not undergo a subsequent procedure to have their temporary stoma closed.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the incidence of nonclosure of ileostomies and identified factors associated with nonclosure.
DESIGN: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.
SETTING: This study was conducted at a tertiary referral cancer hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 296 patients who received anterior resection with a defunctioning ileostomy with protective intention from 2006 to 2013 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the incidence of nonclosure of ileostomy and associated risk factors.
RESULTS: Patients were followed for a median time of 29 months (range, 21-100 months). At the end of the study, 51 (17.2%) patients were left with a permanent ileostomy. The median time interval from the creation of a defunctioning ileostomy to closure was 192 days (range, 14-865 days). Multivariate analyses using a logistic regression model showed that metastatic diseases (OR, 0.179, p < 0.001), Charlson Comorbidity Index score >1 (OR, 0.268; p < 0.01), and complications from the index surgery (OR, 0.391; p = 0.013) were significant independent risk factors for failing to close a defunctioning ileostomy. LIMITATIONS: Although our study has a large patient cohort, it is limited by its retrospective nature. It is difficult to fully evaluate stoma complications after hospital discharge, and the prevalence may be underestimated.
CONCLUSION: One in 6 temporary ileostomies constructed during an elective anterior resection for rectal cancer was not closed. Patients should be told before the index surgery that there is a risk of nonclosure and possible complications associated with permanent ileostomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26734966     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  12 in total

1.  Calcification of the iliac arteries: a marker for leakage risk in rectal anastomosis-a blinded clinical trial.

Authors:  Julius Pochhammer; Fridolin Tröster; Gunnar Blumenstock; Julienne Closset; Stefanie Lang; Marie-Pascale Weller; Michael Schäffer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Low preoperative maximum squeezing pressure evaluated by anorectal manometry is a risk factor for non-reversal of diverting stoma.

Authors:  Risa Fukui; Hiroaki Nozawa; Yugo Hirata; Kazushige Kawai; Keisuke Hata; Toshiaki Tanaka; Takeshi Nishikawa; Yasutaka Shuno; Kazuhito Sasaki; Manabu Kaneko; Koji Murono; Shigenobu Emoto; Hirofumi Sonoda; Hiroaki Ishii; Soichiro Ishihara
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  The fate of preserved sphincter in rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Ri Na Yoo; Gun Kim; Bong-Hyeon Kye; Hyeon-Min Cho; HyungJin Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Role of transanal drainage tubes in preventing anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  S Zhao; K Hu; Y Tian; Y Xu; W Tong
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.699

5.  Preoperative risk stratification of permanent stoma in patients with non-metastatic mid and low rectal cancer undergoing curative resection and a temporary stoma.

Authors:  Shu-Huan Huang; Kun-Yu Tsai; Tzong-Yun Tsai; Jeng-Fu You; Chien-Yuh Yeh; Pao-Shiu Hsieh; Reiping Tang; Jy-Ming Chiang; Wen-Sy Tsai
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Risk factors of stoma re-creation after closure of diverting ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection or intersphincteric resection with loop ileostomy.

Authors:  Ook Song; Kyung Hwan Kim; Soo Young Lee; Chang Hyun Kim; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  Stoma prolapse handmade repair under local anesthesia with variation of Altemeier method in severe patients: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Vasileios Papadopoulos; Petros Bangeas; Kassandra Xanthopoulou; Daniel Paramythiotis; Antonios Michalopoulos
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-02-28

8.  Loop-ileostomy reversal-patient-related characteristics influencing time to closure.

Authors:  Carl Pontus Gustafsson; Ulf Gunnarsson; Ursula Dahlstrand; Ulrik Lindforss
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Value of intra-operative Doppler sonographic measurements in predicting post-operative anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Chang-Zheng Du; Zhi-Hui Fan; Yuan-Fan Yang; Ping Yuan; Jin Gu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Risk factors for non-closure of an intended temporary defunctioning stoma after emergency resection of left-sided obstructive colon cancer.

Authors:  S J van Ommeren-Olijve; J P M Burbach; E J B Furnée
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.