Literature DB >> 26733747

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease severity, central fat mass and adinopectin: a close relationship.

Ludovico Abenavoli1, Laura DI Renzo2, Pietro Hiram Guzzi3, Rinaldo Pellicano4, Natasa Milic5, Antonino DE Lorenzo2.   

Abstract

AIM: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease in the general population. Overweight is a common condition in patients with NAFLD, and body composition (BC) assessment is useful to evaluate nutritional status and the efficacy of nutritional strategies. A valid tool for assessing BC is dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Adiponectin has been shown to be relevant to the pathogenesis of NAFLD. The aim of this observational study is to define the relationship between the severity of NAFLD, the central fat mass evaluated by DXA, and the circulating levels of adiponectin.
METHODS: The study was carried out in 31 overweight patients. The degree of liver steatosis was evaluated by ultrasound (US) examination. Anthropometric parameters were measured according to standard methods. Fasting glucose and insulin level were used also to calculate insulin resistance (IR), according to the homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique was performed to dose fasting serum levels of adiponectin.
RESULTS: NAFLD progression was significantly associated with increased central fat (p<0.05). Using DXA, we quantified the regional distribution of adipose tissue and found the expected association between central fat and the US severity of NAFLD. Serum levels of adiponectin, were inversely related to NAFLD progression (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: BC evaluated by anthropometry and DXA, may be used as indicator of NAFLD severity in overweight patients. The evaluation of BC in clinical practice, can improve the nutritional strategies and follow-up. In the clinical setting adiponectin may represent a potential marker for the staging of NAFLD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adiponectin; body composition; central obesity; insulin resistance; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Year:  2015        PMID: 26733747      PMCID: PMC4689242          DOI: 10.15386/cjmed-595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clujul Med        ISSN: 1222-2119


Introduction

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a relevant issue in public health [1,2]. It represents the most common chronic liver disease in the general population and is expected to increase in the future, as a result of an ageing population, obesity and diabetes [2]. NAFLD is the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome and includes a spectrum of disease ranging from simple hepatic steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which can progress to cirrhosis. NAFLD occurs in 60–95% of patients with obesity and in 28–55% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Insulin resistance (IR), with compensatory hyperinsulinemia, plays a pathogenetic key role in NAFLD progression [3]. Given its low cost, repeatability, safety and availability, ultrasound (US) is routinely the first-line imaging technique to detect liver steatosis [4]. US is used for the diagnosis of steatosis on conventional grayscale mode. Central obesity, defined as a presence of excess fat in the abdominal area, is frequently associated with NAFLD and their coexistence in the same subjects increases the likelihood of having more advanced forms of liver disease [5,6]. Liver steatosis progression is associated not only with the body mass index (BMI), but also with visceral adiposity [6]. However, fat mass and fat distribution can be different in subjects with the same BMI [7]. For these reasons, the body composition (BC) evaluation is necessary for assess the nutritional status and the efficacy of nutritional strategies. A valid and precise tool to measuring BC, is the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), an important method for studying not only osteoporosis but also the soft-tissue composition changes [8]. The accuracy of DXA in measuring the fat mass is 98.8%, and combined with other standard anthropometric parameters, it is a reliable tool for the estimation of central fat [9]. The adipose tissue, has been considered an energy storage organ, but over the last decade several findings have encouraged researches on its the endocrine role. Furthermore, data highlighted that central adipose tissue is a metabolic and inflammatory organ that modulates the action and the metabolism of brain, liver, muscle and cardiovascular system [10]. Recently, the important role of adipokines, peptides synthesized from adipocytes, in the pathogenesis of IR and NAFLD has been discussed [11]. In particular, adiponectin is considered an anti-inflammatory adipokine, able to reduce body fat, to improve hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, and inversely associated with BMI, IR and hepatic fat accumulation [12]. The aim of this observational study was to investigate, in overweight patients, the possible relationship between central fat mass, liver steatosis and the circulating levels of adiponectin.

Materials and methods

The study was carried out in overweight patients, referred to the Division of Clinical Nutrition and Nutrigenomics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” of Rome (Italy), for a nutritional evaluation, in the period January – July 2013. The study was performed in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and complying with the principles laid down of Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the appropriate Ethical Committee of the Centre, and all patients gave their written informed consent before the recruitment. We excluded patients with heart diseases, renal failure even if newly discovered. Other exclusion criteria were: insulin therapy, smoking habits, alcohol intake (>20 g/day), hepatic virus infection, auto-immune diseases, and use of drugs known to induce liver steatosis or NASH. After the initial evaluation of 52 patients, 21 (40.4%) were excluded: 5 for heart diseases, 4 for insulin therapy, 2 for hepatitis B virus infection, 6 for excessive daily alcohol intake and 4 for treatment with drugs-inducing steatosis or NASH.

Anthropometric and laboratory evaluation

Body weight, height, BMI, and waist circumference were measured according to standard methods [13]. All subjects underwent a biochemical examination of fasting glucose, fasting insulin and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Fasting glucose and insulin level were used also to calculate IR, according to the homeostasis homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) [14]. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique was used to measure fasting serum levels of adiponectin in all patients (R&D Systems Inc., USA).

Ultrasound assessment of NAFLD

The patients underwent US liver by a Toshiba Eccocee, with a convex transducer of 3.7 Mhz. The results were interpreted by an investigator (LA) with experience in the field. The liver images were considered normal if the texture was homogenous, exhibited fine level echoes and isoechoic compared to the renal cortex and there was adequate visualization of the hepatic vessels and diaphragm (grade 0). Criteria for determining the stage of liver steatosis, in according to the Hamaguchi score, included: presence of bright echoes or increased hepato-renal contrast indicative of mild steatosis (grade 1); presence of both bright echoes and increased hepato-renal contrast as well as vessel blurring indicative of moderate steatosis (grade 2); severe steatosis was considered when in addition to the criteria for moderate steatosis, there was evidence of posterior beam attenuation and non-visualization of the diaphragm (grade 3) [4].

Body composition analysis

BC was assessed by DXA (Lunar DPX-IQ; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI), according to the standardized described procedure [15]. Standard DXA quality control and calibration measures, were performed prior to each testing session. The subjects, were instructed to avoid exercise within 24 hours from the test. The test takes about twenty minutes, and the subjects remain in a supine position during the scanning. The results, were transmitted to a connected computer for further analysis, according to the manufacturer orientation.

Statistical analysis

In order to show the relation between DXA parameters and US stage of NAFLD, we displayed graphically the evolution of these features among classes, and we assessed the statistical significance of clinical and laboratory features. All study variables, were treated as continuous variables. Summary outcome measures were reported as mean±standard deviation. Statistical differences of laboratory and clinical variables between the four groups were evaluated by the ANOVA test. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using the statistical package Primer for Windows.

Results

Clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients, stratified on the basis of the US stage of NAFLD, are reported in table I. Of the 31 patients included in the study, 13 were male (41.9%). The median value of anthropometric parameters assessed were: BMI 31.4±5.9 and waist circumference 97.2±16.2 cm, with 16 patients (7 males) that presented central obesity, according to the definition of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) [16].
Table I

Clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients on the basis of US severity of NAFLD.

VariableOverallGrade 0Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3
Age (years)49.2 ± 12.144.4±10.950.9±10.355.7±17.047.1±11
Weight (kg)87.2±20.375.3±13.381.6±21.584.51±18.5106.86±23.7
Male13 (41.9%)3 (9.6%)3 (9.6%)2 (6.4%)5 (16.1%)
BMI (Kg/m2)31.4±5.928.0±4.430.6±2.731.5±7.635.3±5.4
Waist circumference (cm)97.2±16.287.1±11.795±15.2101.3±4.8108.2±20.5
ALT (n.v. <32 UI−1)33.6±27.319.5±11.130.4±20.640.1±26.149.3±42.1
Fasting glucose (n.v. 70 – 100 mg/100 ml)105.8±13.8*92±5.85101.3±1.4105±6.5124.75±9.24
Fasting Insulin (n.v. <25 mU ml−1)25.1±4.3*21.8±2.822.9±1.824.7±1.4630.9±2.6
HOMA-IR Index (n.v. <1.5)1.2±0.3*0.9±0.11.0±0.11.2±0.11.7±0.2
Adiponectin (n.v. 10μg/mL)7.8±2.2*11.2±0.77.1±0.86.1±0.35.9±0.3
AF (%)42.6±11.9*33.6±1543.2±1147.15±6.748.5±7.5
ATM (kg)7±2.5*5.2±1.56.8±1.97.3±1.19.22±3.1
AFM (kg)3.9±1*4±0.84±14.3±0.74.6±1.2
Distribution of L2–L5 (g)5.2±1.24.6±1.14.9±1.55.5±1.25.9±1
US evaluation of the liver showed that: in 8 patients (25.8%) steatosis was absent, in 9 (29%) mild (grade 1), in 6 (19.4%) moderate (grade 2), and in 8 (25.8%) severe (grade 3). The median value of ALT was 33.6±27.3 Ul-1, with four patients that reported high ALT value, one without, two with mild and one with severe US liver steatosis. Of all DXA parameters analyzed, those that present a statistical significant difference between the US stages of NAFLD were (Figure 1): abdominal fat (AF, %), mean value 42.6±11.9 (p<0.05); abdominal tissue mass (ATM: fat plus lean mass, kg), (mean value 7±2.5, p<0.05); abdominal fat mass (AFM, kg), (mean value 3.9±1, p<0.05). Considering the only distribution of L2–L5 fat tissue (kg), (mean value 5.2±1.2), we observed that the value was higher, but reached no statistical significance, in patients with moderate and severe steatosis, compared to those with the mild type. The assessment of IR by HOMA-IR, showed a statistically significant increase of insulin level, related to steatosis progression (p<0.05). Finally, the concentration of adiponectin (7.78±2.2 μg/mL), was significantly lower in the advanced US stages of NAFLD (p<0.05).
Figure 1

Distribution of abdominal fat (box A), abdominal tissue mass (box B) and abdominal fat mass (box C) in different US stages of NAFLD.

Discussion

Literature reported the association between central obesity and liver steatosis [16]. Obesity, which is often associated with IR, represents a chronic low-grade inflammatory state, characterized by elevated circulating levels of cytokines and activation of pro-inflammatory signaling pathways [17]. In particular, IR plays a key role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD, causing alterations in the uptake, degradation or secretion of lipid molecules, with consequent accumulation of lipid in the hepatocytes [17,18]. NAFLD is usually prevalent in obese subjects, and several studies have reported that regional fat distribution associated with IR is an important factor for development and progression of liver steatosis [4,11]. In our study, abdominal fat accumulation and anthropometric parameters, increased with US severity of liver steatosis and IR. In this context, DXA seems to be an useful tool to evaluate overweight patients. The first observation is that by using DXA, we quantified the regional distribution of adipose tissue and we found the association between increased central fat mass, and liver steatosis severity. This observation is in agreement with the progression of the values of BMI and circumference observed in our series. Concerning the relationship between BC and NAFLD, this study has shown that central fat accumulation constitutes an important determinant of liver steatosis in overweight patients, independently to BMI. Recent data document that the abdominal adipose tissue is an active endocrine organ capable to secrete a multitude of hormones, cytokines, chemokines, and enzymes, collectively known as adipokines [5]. In particular adiponectin, leptin, resistin, visfatin and pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukins, have been shown to be involved in pathogenesis and progression of NAFLD [11,12]. The increased number of abdominal adipocytes produces a disequilibrium in adipokines secretion, which promotes liver fat accumulation, and subsequently the development of NAFLD. In particular, adiponectin improves muscular and hepatic insulin sensitivity, through its anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic activity, and its ability to decrease triglyceride synthesis and stimulate β-oxidation [3,11]. In fact adiponectin protects hepatocytes from triglycerides accumulation by increasing β-oxidation of free fatty acid and/or decreasing de novo free fatty acid production in hepatocytes [19]. Adiponectin levels are reduced in obese patients, and T2DM, and the plasma concentrations are inversely related to body weight, especially to visceral adiposity [20]. Moreover, adiponectin is inversely associated with other traditional cardiovascular risk factors, such as blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and is positively related to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels [21]. In our cohort, US liver steatosis progression is characterized by IR and low adiponectin serum levels, pathogenetic factors that can increase the concentrations of intra-cellular fatty acids, and may enhance oxidative stress that is the second stage in the pathogenesis of NASH.

Conclusion

BC assessed by anthropometry and DXA, may be used as indicator of NAFLD severity in overweight patients. In particular we report the direct relationship between central fat mass and NAFLD progression. However, further studies are required to better understand not only this correlation, but also to define the pathogenetic role of central fat distribution and the changes in adipokine levels in the progression of NAFLD.
  21 in total

1.  Metformin versus dietary treatment in nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis: a randomized study.

Authors:  G A Garinis; B Fruci; A Mazza; M De Siena; S Abenavoli; E Gulletta; V Ventura; M Greco; L Abenavoli; A Belfiore
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Normal-weight obese syndrome: early inflammation?

Authors:  Antonino De Lorenzo; Vera Del Gobbo; Maria Grazia Premrov; Mario Bigioni; Fabio Galvano; Laura Di Renzo
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in pre-obese/obese women undergoing reduction mammaplasty.

Authors:  Valerio Cervelli; Laura Di Renzo; Monica Grimaldi; Maria Chiara Di Fede; Pietro Gentile; Gianpiero Gravante; Nicola di Lorenzo; Antonino De Lorenzo
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Body composition assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Authors:  A Andreoli; G Scalzo; S Masala; U Tarantino; G Guglielmi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  From NAFLD in clinical practice to answers from guidelines.

Authors:  Fabio Nascimbeni; Raluca Pais; Stefano Bellentani; Christopher Paul Day; Vlad Ratziu; Paola Loria; Amedeo Lonardo
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 25.083

6.  Serum adipokine levels in overweight patients and their relationship with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  L Abenavoli; C Luigiano; P H Guzzi; N Milic; C Morace; L Stelitano; P Consolo; S Miraglia; S Fagoonee; C Virgilio; F Luzza; A De Lorenzo; R Pellicano
Journal:  Panminerva Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.197

7.  Paradoxical decrease of an adipose-specific protein, adiponectin, in obesity. 1999.

Authors:  Yukio Arita; Shinji Kihara; Noriyuki Ouchi; Masahiko Takahashi; Kazuhisa Maeda; Jun-ichiro Miyagawa; Kikuko Hotta; Iichiro Shimomura; Tadashi Nakamura; Koji Miyaoka; Hiroshi Kuriyama; Makoto Nishida; Shizuya Yamashita; Kosaku Okubo; Kenji Matsubara; Masahiro Muraguchi; Yasuichi Ohmoto; Tohru Funahashi; Yuji Matsuzawa
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 8.  Inflammation as a potential link between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance.

Authors:  Mohamed Asrih; François R Jornayvaz
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.286

9.  A 360-degree overview of body composition in healthy people: relationships among anthropometry, ultrasonography, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Alberto Bazzocchi; Danila Diano; Federico Ponti; Eugenio Salizzoni; Ugo Albisinni; Giulio Marchesini; Giuseppe Battista
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.008

10.  Practical techniques for assessing body composition in middle-aged and older adults.

Authors:  D P Williams; S B Going; L A Milliken; M C Hall; T G Lohman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  10 in total

1.  Fatty liver as a risk factor for progression from metabolically healthy to metabolically abnormal in non-overweight individuals.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Hashimoto; Masahide Hamaguchi; Takuya Fukuda; Akihiro Ohbora; Takao Kojima; Michiaki Fukui
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Adipokine Levels Versus Hepatic Histopathology in Bariatric Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Rafael Bergesch D'Incao; Cristiane Valle Tovo; Vanessa Suñé Mattevi; Diego Olschowsky Borges; Jane Maria Ulbrich; Gabriela Perdomo Coral; Mauricio Jacques Ramos; Nelson Guardiola Meinhardt
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  S2FLNet: Hepatic steatosis detection network with body shape.

Authors:  Qiyue Wang; Wu Xue; Xiaoke Zhang; Fang Jin; James Hahn
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.698

4.  A20 reduces lipid storage and inflammation in hypertrophic adipocytes via p38 and Akt signaling.

Authors:  Luoyan Ai; Xiaohan Wang; Zhiwei Chen; Qing Lin; Dazhi Su; Qingqing Xu; Changwei Wu; Xiaoke Jiang; Antao Xu; Zhuping Fan
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 5.  Metabolic aspects of adult patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Ludovico Abenavoli; Natasa Milic; Laura Di Renzo; Tomislav Preveden; Milica Medić-Stojanoska; Antonino De Lorenzo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Body Composition and Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Authors:  Ludovico Abenavoli; Laura Di Renzo; Antonino De Lorenzo
Journal:  J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2016-03-31

7.  Association of Adiponectin Gene Polymorphisms With the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in a Chinese Han Population.

Authors:  Shui-Xian Du; Lin-Lin Lu; Yang Liu; Quan-Jiang Dong; Shi-Ying Xuan; Yong-Ning Xin
Journal:  Hepat Mon       Date:  2016-06-26       Impact factor: 0.660

8.  Possible prediction of obesity-related liver disease in children and adolescents using indices of body composition.

Authors:  Magnus Jung Johansen; Morten Asp Vonsild Lund; Lars Ängquist; Cilius Esmann Fonvig; Louise Aas Holm; Elizaveta Chabanova; Henrik S Thomsen; Torben Hansen; Jens-Christian Holm
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.910

9.  Apigenin Ameliorates Dyslipidemia, Hepatic Steatosis and Insulin Resistance by Modulating Metabolic and Transcriptional Profiles in the Liver of High-Fat Diet-Induced Obese Mice.

Authors:  Un Ju Jung; Yun-Young Cho; Myung-Sook Choi
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Enhancement of Adiponectin Ameliorates Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease via Inhibition of FoxO1 in Type I Diabetic Rats.

Authors:  Xiang Xie; Dan Yan; Haobo Li; Qiqi Zhu; Jun Li; Yong-Ping Fang; Chi Wai Cheung; Michael G Irwin; Zhengyuan Xia; Qingquan Lian
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 4.011

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.