N J Roberts1, I S Patel2, M R Partridge3. 1. Department of Nursing and Community Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom. Electronic address: nicola.roberts@gcu.ac.uk. 2. Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London, London, United Kingdom. 3. National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Females with exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease now account for one half of all hospital admissions for that condition and rates have been increasing over the last few decades. Differences in presentations of disease between genders have been shown in several conditions and this study explores whether there are inter gender biases in probable diagnoses in those suspected to have COPD. METHODS: 445 individuals with a provisional diagnosis by their General Practitioner of "suspected COPD" or "definite COPD" were referred to a community Respiratory Assessment unit (CRAU) for tests including spirometry. Gender, demographics, respiratory symptoms and respiratory medical history were recorded. The provisional diagnoses were compared with the final diagnosis made after spirometry and respiratory specialist nurse review and the provisional diagnosis was either confirmed as correct or refuted as unlikely. RESULTS: Significantly more men (87.5%) had their diagnosis of "definite COPD" confirmed compared to 73.9% of women (p = 0.021). When the GP suggested a provisional diagnosis of "suspected COPD" (n = 265) at referral, this was confirmed in 60.9% of men and only 43.2% of women (p = 0.004). There was a different symptom pattern between genders with women being more likely to report allergies, symptoms starting earlier in life, and being less likely than men to report breathlessness as the main symptom. CONCLUSIONS: These results may suggest a difference between genders in some of the clinical features of COPD and a difference in likelihood of a GPs provisional diagnosis of COPD being correct. The study reiterates the absolute importance of spirometry in the diagnosis of COPD.
BACKGROUND: Females with exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease now account for one half of all hospital admissions for that condition and rates have been increasing over the last few decades. Differences in presentations of disease between genders have been shown in several conditions and this study explores whether there are inter gender biases in probable diagnoses in those suspected to have COPD. METHODS: 445 individuals with a provisional diagnosis by their General Practitioner of "suspected COPD" or "definite COPD" were referred to a community Respiratory Assessment unit (CRAU) for tests including spirometry. Gender, demographics, respiratory symptoms and respiratory medical history were recorded. The provisional diagnoses were compared with the final diagnosis made after spirometry and respiratory specialist nurse review and the provisional diagnosis was either confirmed as correct or refuted as unlikely. RESULTS: Significantly more men (87.5%) had their diagnosis of "definite COPD" confirmed compared to 73.9% of women (p = 0.021). When the GP suggested a provisional diagnosis of "suspected COPD" (n = 265) at referral, this was confirmed in 60.9% of men and only 43.2% of women (p = 0.004). There was a different symptom pattern between genders with women being more likely to report allergies, symptoms starting earlier in life, and being less likely than men to report breathlessness as the main symptom. CONCLUSIONS: These results may suggest a difference between genders in some of the clinical features of COPD and a difference in likelihood of a GPs provisional diagnosis of COPD being correct. The study reiterates the absolute importance of spirometry in the diagnosis of COPD.
Authors: Lee Gazourian; William B Thedinger; Shawn M Regis; Elizabeth J Pagura; Lori Lyn Price; Melissa Gawlik; Cristina F Stefanescu; Carla Lamb; Kimberly M Rieger-Christ; Harpreet Singh; Marcel Casasola; Alexander R Walker; Arashdeep Rupal; Avignat S Patel; Carolyn E Come; Ava M Sanayei; William P Long; Giulia S Rizzo; Andrea B McKee; George R Washko; Raul San Jose Estepar; Christoph Wald; Brady J McKee; Carey C Thomson; Timothy N Liesching Journal: Respir Med Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: Ivan Kopitovic; Aleksandar Bokan; Ilija Andrijevic; Miroslav Ilic; Sanja Marinkovic; Dragana Milicic; Marija Vukoja Journal: J Bras Pneumol Date: 2017 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.624
Authors: Joakim Åberg; Mikael Hasselgren; Scott Montgomery; Karin Lisspers; Björn Ställberg; Christer Janson; Josefin Sundh Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2019-05-07
Authors: Johanna M Groeneveld; Aranka V Ballering; Kees van Boven; Reinier P Akkermans; Tim C Olde Hartman; Annemarie A Uijen Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 2.267