| Literature DB >> 26732331 |
P Chanjula1, T Raungprim1, S Yimmongkol2, S Poonko1, S Majarune1, W Maitreejet1.
Abstract
Twenty crossbred steers (400±40.1 kg of initial body weight) were used to assess the effects of a dietary supplementation with crude glycerin (CG) as a substitute for corn grain on performance, carcass traits, and meat quality. Four isocaloric and isonitrogenous diets were offered to the experimental animals (5 steers per treatment) for 121 days using randomized complete block design. The steers individually received dietary treatments containing 0%, 7%, 14%, and 21% of CG (88.91% pure) on a dry matter (DM) basis. The diets were offered ad libitum as total mixed rations twice daily. Weight gain and carcass traits were determined. At the end of the experimental period, the harvest data and carcass characteristics of the steers were recorded, and meat quality was determined. No significant effect of CG inclusion was observed in any of the growth performance and carcass characteristics traits studied. Also, there were no apparent effects of diets (p>0.05) on meat quality (pH, water holding capacity, drip losses, and cooking losses). The study concluded that CG could be used as a substitute for corn grain up to the level of approximately 21% of DM in the diets of finishing steers.Entities:
Keywords: Carcass Characteristic; Cattle; Crude Glycerin; Growth Performance
Year: 2016 PMID: 26732331 PMCID: PMC4698692 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.15.0219
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Ingredients and chemical composition of diets containing increasing amounts of crude glycerin (% DM basis)
| Item | Dietary crude glycerin (% of dietary DM) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | |
| Ingredients composition (%) | ||||
| Crude glycerin | 0.0 | 7.0 | 14.0 | 21.0 |
| Ground corn | 40.0 | 33.0 | 26.0 | 19.0 |
| Cassava chip | 26.6 | 22.6 | 18.5 | 14.4 |
| Palm kernel cake | 12.4 | 16.4 | 20.5 | 24.6 |
| Leucaena leave meal | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Napier hay | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Molasses | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Salt | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Urea | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Mineral and vitamin mix | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3( | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Analyzed nutrient content | ||||
| DM | 87.91 | 86.25 | 84.47 | 83.39 |
| Ash | 4.59 | 4.71 | 4.86 | 5.20 |
| OM | 95.41 | 95.29 | 95.14 | 94.48 |
| CP | 13.95 | 13.98 | 13.95 | 13.92 |
| EE | 2.64 | 2.49 | 2.34 | 2.22 |
| NDF | 44.07 | 42.33 | 38.24 | 39.08 |
| ADF | 19.44 | 19.97 | 20.00 | 19.07 |
| ME | 2.59 | 2.58 | 2.58 | 2.57 |
DM, dry matter; OM, organic matter; CP, crude protein; EE, ether extract; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; ME, metabolizable energy, TDN, total digestible nutrient.
Contained 88.91% glycerol, 5.60% water, 2.24% sodium, and 0.52% methanol (Colorless, odorless, viscous liquid obtained from Biodiesel Producers, New Biodiesel, Surat Thani Province, Thailand).
Minerals and vitamins (each kg contains): Vitamin A, 10,000,000 IU; Vitamin E, 70,000 IU; Vitamin D, 1,600,000 IU; Fe, 50 g; Zn, 40 g; Mn, 40 g; Co, 0.1 g; Cu, 10 g; Se, 0.1 g; I, 0.5 g.
Based on analysis of composite feed sample.
ME = TDN×0.04409×0.82 (NRC, 2000). Calculated with an estimated ME for glycerol of 3.47 Mcal/kg of DM (Mach et al., 2009).
Chemical composition of crude glycerin used in this experiment 1, 2
| Items | Content | Analytical method |
|---|---|---|
| Total glycerin (%) | 88.91 | ASTM D 6584-00E01, titration assay ( |
| Moisture (%) | 5.60 | AOAC |
| DM (%) | 94.40 | Determined by difference |
| Methanol | 0.52 | Gas chromatography |
| Ash | 3.51 | AOAC method 942.05 |
| Sodium | 2.24 | AOAC methods 956.01, 9.15.01 |
| Sulfur | 0.10 | AOAC method 956.01 |
| Free fatty acid | 0.09 | AOAC method Ca 5a-40 |
| Crude protein | 0.01 | AOAC method 990.03 |
| Gross energy (kcal/kg) | 3,961 | Adiabatic bomb calorimeter |
Crude glycerin was obtained from New Biodiesel Co., Ltd., Surat Thani Province.
Analysis by Central Laboratories (Songkhla, SK), Co., Ltd., Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
AOAC (1995).
Expressed as a percentage of crude glycerin DM.
Effects of dietary crude glycerin on performance and DMI of finishing steers
| Item | Dietary crude glycerin (%) | SEM | Contrasts, p-value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | L | Q | C | 0 vs glycerin | ||
| No. of steer | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Days on feed | 121 | 121 | 121 | 121 | - | - | - | - | - |
| BW (kg) | |||||||||
| Initial BW (kg) | 404.0 | 403.2 | 404.4 | 388.9 | 7.41 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.81 |
| Final BW (kg) | 521.0 | 515.0 | 516.0 | 499.0 | 10.60 | 0.53 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.68 |
| Weight gain (kg) | 117.0 | 111.8 | 111.6 | 110.2 | 14.49 | 0.75 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.73 |
| DMI | |||||||||
| kg/d | 7.79 | 7.50 | 7.55 | 7.25 | 0.39 | 0.47 | 0.99 | 0.75 | 0.52 |
| % BW | 1.69 | 1.62 | 1.65 | 1.63 | 0.08 | 0.67 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.57 |
| g/kg of BW0.75 | 78.28 | 75.42 | 76.25 | 74.80 | 3.75 | 0.58 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.53 |
| ADG (kg/d) | 0.968 | 0.932 | 0.920 | 0.920 | 0.12 | 0.77 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 0.75 |
| ADG (g/kg W0.75) | 9.81 | 9.32 | 9.26 | 9.41 | 1.19 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.96 | 0.73 |
| Feed efficiency | 0.124 | 0.122 | 0.121 | 0.125 | 0.01 | 0.96 | 0.83 | 0.92 | 0.95 |
DMI, dry matter intake; SEM, standard error of the mean (n = 5); BW, body weight; ADG, average daily gain.
Treatment and contrast p-values; p-value for L, linear effect; Q, quadratic effect; C, cubic effect.
Compares the effects of 0% glycerin with the combined glycerin treatment.
Effects of dietary crude glycerin on carcass characteristics of finishing steers
| Item | Dietary crude glycerin (%) | SEM | Contrasts, p-value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | L | Q | C | 0 vs glycerin | ||
| Fasted live weight (kg) | 474.6 | 487.8 | 484.2 | 471.2 | 11.76 | 0.89 | 0.59 | 0.94 | 0.81 |
| HCW (kg) | 289.2 | 297.8 | 293.8 | 285.6 | 9.17 | 0.82 | 0.57 | 0.89 | 0.85 |
| CCW (kg) | 283.2 | 291.5 | 287.9 | 279.7 | 8.93 | 0.82 | 0.57 | 0.91 | 0.85 |
| Dressing percentage (%) | 60.8 | 60.9 | 60.8 | 61.1 | 1.02 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.93 |
| Cold dressing percentage (%) | 59.63 | 59.70 | 59.58 | 59.88 | 1.01 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.93 |
| Weight loss (kg) | 5.94 | 6.26 | 5.84 | 5.86 | 0.31 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.55 | 0.92 |
| Weight loss (%) | 1.24 | 1.27 | 1.20 | 1.25 | 0.05 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.30 | 0.95 |
| LM area | 71.60 | 75.22 | 72.30 | 74.50 | 2.75 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.56 | 0.64 |
| WBSF (kg) | 5.82 | 6.49 | 6.36 | 6.75 | 0.35 | 0.12 | 0.71 | 0.43 | 0.11 |
| KPH fat | 22.72 | 24.48 | 24.42 | 25.68 | 1.84 | 0.43 | 0.91 | 0.77 | 0.45 |
| KPH fat (%) | 4.81 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.43 | 0.41 | 0.32 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.48 |
| Back fat thickness (cm) | 1.80 | 1.92 | 1.76 | 1.62 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.22 | 0.52 | 0.78 |
| Marbling score | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 0.66 | 0.57 |
| Meat color | 3.86 | 3.32 | 3.76 | 3.75 | 0.13 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.79 | 0.31 |
SEM, standard error of the mean (n = 5); HCW, hot carcass weight; CCW, cold carcass weight; LM, longissimus dorsi; WBSF, Warner-Bratzler shear force;
Treatment and contrast p-values; p-value for L, linear effect; Q, quadratic effect; C, cubic effect.
Compares the effects of 0% glycerin with the combined glycerin treatment.
LM, longissimus muscle area, cm2.
KPH (kidney, pelvic, and heart fat) as a percentage of carcass weight.
Marbling score from 1 to 5; 1 = no marbling and 5 = highest marbling (Sethakul and Opatpatanakit, 2005).
Meat color score from 1 to 7; 1 = pale pink, 2 = soft pink, 3 = pink, 4 = light red, 5 = red, 6 = medium dark red, and 7 = dark red (Smith et al., 2001).
Physico-chemical characteristics of beef of steers fed different levels of crude glycerin
| Item | Dietary crude glycerin (%) | SEM | Contrasts, p-value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | L | Q | C | 0 vs glycerin | ||
| 45 min pH | 6.54 | 6.41 | 6.46 | 6.50 | 0.07 | 0.78 | 0.20 | 0.57 | 0.27 |
| 24 h pH | 6.10 | 6.09 | 6.11 | 6.11 | 0.02 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.94 |
| Color of LM | |||||||||
| L* | 38.64 | 38.81 | 36.04 | 39.92 | 1.79 | 0.89 | 0.31 | 0.25 | 0.85 |
| a* | 17.32 | 18.03 | 18.57 | 17.92 | 0.79 | 0.56 | 0.45 | 0.80 | 0.42 |
| b* | 8.67 | 10.66 | 8.71 | 10.24 | 1.01 | 0.53 | 0.81 | 0.10 | 0.30 |
| WHC | 73.10 | 72.81 | 71.32 | 72.21 | 2.56 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 0.55 | 0.61 |
| Drip loss (%) | 1.68 | 1.70 | 1.66 | 1.70 | 0.12 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.80 | 0.96 |
| Thawing loss (%) | 11.57 | 10.64 | 11.62 | 12.19 | 1.46 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.95 |
| Cooking loss (%) | 21.70 | 24.53 | 21.22 | 20.71 | 2.26 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.33 | 0.84 |
SEM, standard error of the mean (n = 5); LM, longissimus dorsi; WHC, water holding capacity
Treatment and contrast p-values; p-value for L, linear effect; Q, quadratic effect; C, cubic effect.
Compares the effects of 0% glycerin with the combined glycerin treatment.
pH measurements taken at 45 min after slaughter.
pH measurements taken at 24 h after slaughter.
L* values are a measure of lightness (higher value indicates a lighter color); a* values are a measure of redness (higher value indicates a redder color); b* values are a measure of yellowness (higher value indicates a more yellow color), by CIE, complete international commission on illumination (Hunter color flex).