Literature DB >> 26731477

A comparison of DMET Plus microarray and genome-wide technologies by assessing population substructure.

Jami N Jackson1, Kevin M Long, Yijing He, Alison A Motsinger-Reif, Howard L McLeod, John Jack.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The capacity of the Affymetrix drug metabolism enzymes and transporters (DMET) Plus pharmacogenomics genotyping chip to estimate population substructure and cryptic relatedness was evaluated. The results were compared with estimates using genome-wide HapMap data for the same individuals.
METHODS: For 301 unrelated individuals, spanning three continental populations and one admixed population, genotypic data were collected using the Affymetrix DMET Plus microarray. Genome-wide data on these individuals were obtained from HapMap release 3. Population substructure was assessed using Eigenstrat and ADMIXTURE software for both platforms. Cryptic relatedness was explored by inbreeding coefficient estimation. Nonparametric tests were used to determine correlations of the analytical results of the two genotyping platforms.
RESULTS: Principal components analysis identified population substructure for both datasets, with 15.8 and 16.6% of the total variance explained in the first two principal components for DMET Plus and HapMap data, respectively. ADMIXTURE results correctly identified four subpopulations within each dataset. Nonparametric rank correlations indicated significant associations between analyses with an average ρ=0.7272 (P<10) across the three continental populations and ρ=0.4888 for the admixed population. Concordance correlation coefficients (average ρc=0.9693 across all four subpopulations) strongly indicate concordance between ADMIXTURE results. Inbreeding coefficients were slightly inflated (16 individuals>0.15) using DMET Plus data and no cryptic relatedness was indicated using HapMap data. The inflated inbreeding estimation could be because of the limited number of markers provided by DMET as a random sample of 1832 markers from HapMap also yielded inflated estimates of cryptic relatedness (39 individuals>0.15). Furthermore, use of single nucleotide polymorphisms located in genes involved in metabolism and transport may have different allele frequencies in subpopulations than single nucleotide polymorphisms sampled from the whole genome.
CONCLUSION: The DMET Plus pharmacogenomics genotyping chip is effective in quantifying population substructure across the three continental populations and inferring the presence of an admixed population. On the basis of our results, these microarrays offer sufficient depth for covariate adjustment of population substructure in genomic association studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 26731477      PMCID: PMC5746476          DOI: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics        ISSN: 1744-6872            Impact factor:   2.089


  33 in total

1.  Use of unlinked genetic markers to detect population stratification in association studies.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; N A Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Genomic control, a new approach to genetic-based association studies.

Authors:  B Devlin; K Roeder; L Wasserman
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  The International HapMap Project.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Pharmacogenomics in admixed populations.

Authors:  Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 6.  Using ancestry-informative markers to define populations and detect population stratification.

Authors:  Mary-Anne Enoch; Pei-Hong Shen; Ke Xu; Colin Hodgkinson; David Goldman
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.153

7.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell; Benjamin Neale; Kathe Todd-Brown; Lori Thomas; Manuel A R Ferreira; David Bender; Julian Maller; Pamela Sklar; Paul I W de Bakker; Mark J Daly; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Confounding from cryptic relatedness in case-control association studies.

Authors:  Benjamin F Voight; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Discerning the ancestry of European Americans in genetic association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Johannah Butler; Nick Patterson; Cristian Capelli; Vincenzo L Pascali; Francesca Scarnicci; Andres Ruiz-Linares; Leif Groop; Angelica A Saetta; Penelope Korkolopoulou; Uri Seligsohn; Alicja Waliszewska; Christine Schirmer; Kristin Ardlie; Alexis Ramos; James Nemesh; Lori Arbeitman; David B Goldstein; David Reich; Joel N Hirschhorn
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  6 in total

1.  Exploring Variation in Known Pharmacogenetic Variants and its Association with Drug Response in Different Mexican Populations.

Authors:  Vanessa Gonzalez-Covarrubias; José Jaime Martínez-Magaña; Regina Coronado-Sosa; Beatriz Villegas-Torres; Alma D Genis-Mendoza; Pablo Canales-Herrerias; Humberto Nicolini; Xavier Soberón
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  The targetable A1 Huntington disease haplotype has distinct Amerindian and European origins in Latin America.

Authors:  Chris Kay; Indira Tirado-Hurtado; Mario Cornejo-Olivas; Jennifer A Collins; Galen Wright; Miguel Inca-Martinez; Diego Veliz-Otani; Maria E Ketelaar; Ramy A Slama; Colin J Ross; Pilar Mazzetti; Michael R Hayden
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  The Advantages and Challenges of Diversity in Pharmacogenomics: Can Minority Populations Bring Us Closer to Implementation?

Authors:  Honghong Zhang; Tanima De; Yizhen Zhong; Minoli A Perera
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Comparison of genome sequencing and clinical genotyping for pharmacogenes.

Authors:  W Yang; G Wu; U Broeckel; C A Smith; V Turner; C E Haidar; S Wang; R Carter; S E Karol; G Neale; K R Crews; J J Yang; C G Mullighan; J R Downing; W E Evans; M V Relling
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  A European Spectrum of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers: Implications for Clinical Pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Clint Mizzi; Eleni Dalabira; Judit Kumuthini; Nduna Dzimiri; Istvan Balogh; Nazli Başak; Ruwen Böhm; Joseph Borg; Paola Borgiani; Nada Bozina; Henrike Bruckmueller; Beata Burzynska; Angel Carracedo; Ingolf Cascorbi; Constantinos Deltas; Vita Dolzan; Anthony Fenech; Godfrey Grech; Vytautas Kasiulevicius; Ľudevít Kádaši; Vaidutis Kučinskas; Elza Khusnutdinova; Yiannis L Loukas; Milan Macek; Halyna Makukh; Ron Mathijssen; Konstantinos Mitropoulos; Christina Mitropoulou; Giuseppe Novelli; Ioanna Papantoni; Sonja Pavlovic; Giuseppe Saglio; Jadranka Setric; Maja Stojiljkovic; Andrew P Stubbs; Alessio Squassina; Maria Torres; Marek Turnovec; Ron H van Schaik; Konstantinos Voskarides; Salma M Wakil; Anneke Werk; Maria Del Zompo; Branka Zukic; Theodora Katsila; Ming Ta Michael Lee; Alison Motsinger-Rief; Howard L Mc Leod; Peter J van der Spek; George P Patrinos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Identification of ancestry proportions in admixed groups across the Americas using clinical pharmacogenomic SNP panels.

Authors:  Guilherme Debortoli; Gilderlanio Santana de Araujo; Cesar Fortes-Lima; Esteban J Parra; Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.