| Literature DB >> 26731278 |
Nadine Akbar1,2, Antonio Giorgio3, Christine Till4, John G Sled5,6, Sam M Doesburg1,2, Nicola De Stefano3, Brenda Banwell7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reduced white matter (WM) integrity is a fundamental aspect of pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS), though relations to resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) connectivity remain unknown. The objective of this study was to relate diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) measures of WM microstructural integrity to resting-state network (RSN) functional connectivity in pediatric-onset MS to test the hypothesis that abnormalities in RSN reflects changes in structural integrity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26731278 PMCID: PMC4701472 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145906
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic, Disease-Related, and Structural MRI Data for all Subjects.
| Variable | Pediatric-onset MS (n = 19) | Healthy Controls (n = 16) | Between-groups comparison (t-test or X2) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.7 (13–24) | 19.1 (13–24) | .403 | .69 | ||
| 14/5 | 11/5 | .104 | .748 | ||
| 64.5 (37.8) | |||||
| 13.2 (2.72) | |||||
| 1.5 (0–4) | |||||
| 4 (1–13) | |||||
| 17/2 | |||||
| 44.3 (13.8) | 39.0 (15.4) | -1.04 | .307 | ||
| 14.9 (13.1) | 11.9(8.0) | -.801 | .429 | ||
| 30.0 (13.4) | 23.3(8.8) | -1.677 | .103 | ||
| 16/3 | 15/1 | 1.756 | .416 | ||
| 14.1 (26.3) | |||||
| 8.94 (18.2) | |||||
| 1328 (127.9) | 1296 (133.8) | -.722 | .476 | ||
| 11.64 (1.39) | 12.65 (1.078) | 2.38 | .023 | ||
| .00880 (.00090) | .00978 (.00035) | 4.10 | < .001 | ||
| 2.23 (1.67) | 2.27 (1.10) | .067 | .947 | ||
| 1.06 (.774) | 1.42 (.672) | 1.46 | .153 | ||
EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; BSMSS = Barratt Simplified Measure of Social Status (BSMSS); CES-DC = Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children; PedsQL = Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale.
aMonths since first attack
bAge at first attack
cBased on Dutch Handedness Questionnaire
dNormalized thalamic volume = thalamic volume/ brain volume
*p < .05
**p < .01
Differences Between Groups on DTI and fMRI Measures.
| Measure (mean, SD) | Pediatric MS (n = 19) | Healthy Control (n = 16) | t-test | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .437 (.025) | .458 (.015) | 2.84 | .008 | ||
| .551 (.041) | .616 (.020) | 5.84 | < .001 | ||
| .637 (.058) | .714 (.032) | 5.02 | < .001 | ||
| .644 (.065) | .701 (.040) | 3.05 | .005 | ||
| .748 (.049) | .796 (.016) | 4.63 | < .001 | ||
| .596 (.053) | .669 (.027) | 5.26 | < .001 | ||
| .601 (.043) | .680 (.024) | 6.50 | < .001 | ||
| .445 (.047) | .497 (.029) | 4.03 | < .001 | ||
| .443 (.046) | .493 (.026) | 4.02 | < .001 | ||
| .485 (.050) | .542 (.029) | 4.15 | < .001 | ||
| .463 (.047) | .522 (.021) | 4.91 | < .001 | ||
| .536 (.041) | .594 (.023) | 4.75 | < .001 | ||
| .536 (.045) | .607 (.028) | 5.44 | < .001 | ||
| 1.26 (.042) | 1.24 (.023) | -1.43 | .163 | ||
| 1.53 (.057) | 1.51 (.029) | -1.07 | .294 | ||
| .622 (.052) | .585 (.027) | -2.51 | .017 | ||
| .534 (.013) | .433 (.049) | -3.22 | .004 | ||
| 3.20 (2.34) | -2.67 (3.08) | -6.40 | < .001 | ||
| 11.92 (5.75) | 3.43 (4.64) | -4.74 | < .001 | ||
| 9.51 (5.74) | 1.49 (4.42) | -4.56 | < .001 | ||
| 3.21 (4.66) | -5.77 (4.83) | -5.59 | < .001 | ||
a mean values reported are for only those voxels that demonstrated significantly different FA values between groups in t-test analysis
b mean values reported are for only those voxels that demonstrated significantly different FA values between groups in t-test analysis, restricted to certain WM structures as defined by FSL’s JHU white-matter tractography atlas (Mori et al. 2008)
cmean values reported are for clusters depicted in Fig 2K. These clusters represent only those areas that differed significantly between groups in the voxel-wise dual regression analysis.
*p < .05
**p < .01
Fig 1Differences between groups in white matter FA.
(a) WM skeleton (green) depicting areas in which the pediatric-onset MS group demonstrated lower FA (blue) compared to the healthy control group (p < .01, corrected). (b) Mean lesion map of the pediatric MS group with brighter (yellow) areas representing voxels with higher probability of lesion occurrence. MNI152 template slice coordinates are also reported.
Fig 2Differences between groups in functional connectivity of resting-state networks.
Group ICA components (3D volumes) including (a) default mode network, (b) primary visual network, (c) secondary visual network, (d) salience network, (e) right frontoparietal network, (f) left frontoparietal network, (g) sensorimotor network, and (h) dorsal attention network. The ICA components are shown in FSL red-yellow encoding using a 3< z-score <10 threshold. The (i) bilateral frontoparietal and (j) precuneus (posterior default-mode) networks were the only networks which demonstrated significant differences between groups (p < .005 uncorrected, cluster size> 30 voxels). Areas in blue below these networks (k), with numbered clusters 1–4, indicate those areas within these networks in which the pediatric-onset MS group demonstrated higher connectivity compared to healthy controls. C1 indicates the anterior cingulate cluster and C2 the left middle frontal gyrus cluster of the bilateral frontoparietal network. C3 indicates the right precuneus and C4 the anterior cingulate cluster of the precuneus posterior default-mode network. Statistics for the connectivity values of these clusters are referred to throughout the text. All images are displayed in radiological convention. (Left = Right, Right = Left). The most informative slices are shown.
Correlation between DTI and Functional Connectivity Measures within Pediatric MS Group.
| Measure (mean, SD) | C1- FrontoPar, ACC | C2- FrontoPar, LMidFron | C3- Default mode, RPrecuneus | C4- Default mode, ACC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -.329 (.169) | -.153 (.532) | -.525 (.021) | .042(.865) | ||
| -.181 (.459) | .022 (.929) | -.351 (.140) | .035 (.886) | ||
| -.085 (.729) | .104 (.672) | -.252 (.298) | .009 (.972) | ||
| -.296 (.218) | -.083 (.735) | -.553 (.014) | .028 (.909) | ||
| -.288 (.232) | .105 (.669) | -.409 (.082) | .021 (.932) | ||
| -.120 (.623) | .088 (.720) | -.094 (.703) | .137 (.575) | ||
| -.004 (.986) | .078 (.751) | -.147 (.548) | .022 (.930) | ||
| .033 (.895) | -.054 (.827) | -.136 (.580) | -.022 (.930) | ||
| -.172 (.481) | .103 (.675) | -.152 (.534) | .176 (.472) | ||
| -.088 (.721) | .046 (.850) | -.429 (.067) | .093 (.706) | ||
| -.112 (.647) | .170 (.486) | -.348 (.144) | -.054(.826) | ||
| -.111 (.651) | -.078 (.751) | -.467 (.044) | .061 (.804) | ||
| -.150 (.539) | .045 (.855) | -.615 (.005) | .014 (.955) | ||
| .361 (.129) | .014 (.956) | .661 (.002) | -.040 (.872) | ||
| .256 (.289) | -.130 (.597) | .486 (.035) | -.005 (.983) | ||
| .176 (.472) | -.145 (.553) | .350 (.141) | .012 (.962) | ||
| .318 (.185) | .105 (.669) | .679 (.001) | -.043 (.862) | ||
| .314 (.191) | -.176 (.472) | .501 (.029) | -.008 (.973) | ||
| .140 (.568) | -.170 (.486) | .217 (.372) | -.109 (.656) | ||
| .084 (.733) | -.201 (.408) | .341 (.153) | .034 (.891) | ||
| .201 (.408) | .037 (.880) | .399 (.091) | .102 (.677) | ||
| .385 (.104) | -.207 (.394) | .273 (.259) | -.132 (.591) | ||
| .245 (.313) | -.141 (.566) | .582 (.009) | -.052 (.831) | ||
| .227 (.351) | -.176 (.471) | .601 (.007) | .063 (.798) | ||
| .204 (.402) | -.032 (.896) | .588 (.008) | -.028 (.911) | ||
| .147 (.548) | -.086 (.727) | .658 (.002) | .013 (.957) | ||
Functional connectivity measures correspond to those clusters depicted in Fig 2K and include C1 (anterior cingulate cortex) and C2 (left middle frontal gyrus) of the bilateral frontoparietal network, C3 (right precuneus) and C4 (anterior cingulate cortex) of the precuneus default-mode network. Pearson correlation coefficients (r-values) are reported with their corresponding p-values.
amean values reported are for only those voxels that demonstrated significantly different FA values between groups in t-test analysis.
bmean values reported are for only those voxels that demonstrated significantly different FA values between groups in t-test analysis, restricted to certain WM structures as defined by FSL’s JHU white-matter tractography atlas (Mori et al. 2008).
*p < .05
**p < .01