| Literature DB >> 26730387 |
Se-Na Lim1, Joo-Hee Chai1, Jong Kook Song1, Myong-Won Seo1, Hyun-Bae Kim1.
Abstract
This study compared nutritional intake, body composition, bone mineral density, and isokinetic strength by dance type in collegiate female dancers. The study subjects included Korean dancers (n=12), ballet dancers (n=13), contemporary dancers (n=8), and controls (n=12). Nutritional intake was estimated using the Computer Aided Nutritional Analysis Program. Body composition and bone mineral density were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Isokinetic knee joint strength was measured by Cybex 770-NORM. All statistical analyses were performed by SAS 9.2. Means and standard deviations were calculated using descriptive statistics. One-way analysis of variance was applied to evaluate nutritional intake, body composition, bone mineral density, and isokinetic strength differences. Duncan multiple range test was used for post hoc testing. A level of significance was set at P<0.05. The study results indicated no significant differences in nutritional in-take among dancer types. Despite no significant differences in body composition among dancer types, contemporary and ballet dancers had lower body fat percentages than controls (P<0.05). No significant differences were seen in bone mineral density and bone mineral contents among dancer types. No significant differences were found in isokinetic strength in right or left knee flexion and extension at 60°/sec (P<0.05). There were significant differences in body composition and isokinetic strength between dancer groups and the control group. Further studies of different professional dance type and more scientific methods of dance training are needed.Entities:
Keywords: Ballet; Body composition; Bone mineral density; Contemporary dance; Isokinetic strength; Korean dance
Year: 2015 PMID: 26730387 PMCID: PMC4697785 DOI: 10.12965/jer.150244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exerc Rehabil ISSN: 2288-176X
Subject characteristics by study group
| Characteristic | Female dance group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Korean (n=12) | Ballet (n=13) | Contemporary (n=8) | Control (n=12) | |
| Body weight (kg) | 54.5 ± 6.45 | 51.0 ± 4.70 | 54.7 ± 6.89 | 53.0 ± 6.38 |
| Standing height (cm) | 164.9 ± 3.29 | 163.3 ± 3.55 | 164.8 ± 3.42 | 160.3 ± 5.10 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Comparisons of nutritional intake condition parameters by dance types in collegiate female dancers
| Variable | Female dance group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Korean (n=12) | Ballet (n=13) | Contemporary (n=8) | Control (n=12) | |||
| Total calories (kcal) | 1,100.9 ± 472.89 | 1,214.4 ± 390.32 | 1,454.1 ± 478.59 | 1,306.9 ± 332.53 | 1.26 | 0.30 |
| Protein (g) | 43.3 ± 17.92 | 45.4 ± 15.31 | 55.3 ± 18.95 | 50.9 ± 15.37 | 1.06 | 0.38 |
| Fat (g) | 35.8 ± 17.55 | 36.0 ± 10.87 | 49.8 ± 17.82 | 40.4 ± 11.57 | 1.90 | 0.14 |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 151.9 ± 63.50 | 177.8 ± 63.70 | 196.3 ± 67.99 | 176.7 ± 46.17 | 0.93 | 0.44 |
| Ca (mg) | 269.2 ± 150.14 | 364.6 ± 108.67 | 367.4 ± 144.18 | 350.2 ± 124.85 | 1.44 | 0.25 |
| P (mg) | 557.5 ± 257.41 | 629.4 ± 215.38 | 736.9 ± 271.83 | 677.1 ± 206.70 | 1.05 | 0.38 |
| Fe (mg) | 7.2 ± 3.53 | 8.1 ± 3.23 | 8.9 ± 2.74 | 9.7 ± 5.28 | 0.87 | 0.47 |
| Zn (mg) | 5.1 ± 2.29 | 5.6 ± 2.08 | 6.5 ± 2.40 | 6.1 ± 2.20 | 0.81 | 0.50 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Comparisons of body composition parameters by dance type in collegiate female dancers
| Parameter | Female dance group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Korean (n=12) | Ballet (n=13) | Contemporary (n=8) | Control (n=12) | |||
| Lean tissue (kg) | 36.8 ± 3.00 | 36.5 ± 2.85 | 39.3 ± 2.10 | 35.4 ± 4.63 | 2.07 | 0.12 |
| Percent body fat (%) | 27.7 ± 4.64 | 24.8 ± 3.12 | 24.5 ± 4.57 | 30.0 ± 3.09 | 5.2 | 0.004 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Same alphabet indicates no significant difference among groups.
P<0.05.
Comparisons of total body BMD by dance type in collegiate female dancers
| Female dance group | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Korean (n=12) | Ballet (n=13) | Contemporary (n=8) | Control (n=12) | |||
| Total BMD (g/cm2) | 1.1 ± 0.06 | 1.1 ± 0.06 | 1.1 ± 0.06 | 1.1 ± 0.09 | 1.6 | 0.2 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
BMD, bone mineral density.
Comparisons of isokinetic muscular strength at %BW 60°/sec by dance type in collegiate female dancers
| Isokinetic muscular strength | Female dance group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Korean (n=12) | Ballet (n=13) | Contemporary (n=8) | Control (n=12) | |||
| Extensor peak torque %BW (N·m/kg) | ||||||
| Right | 178.5 ± 19.48 | 176.0 ± 34.68 | 184.3 ± 19.16 | 160.5 ± 28.11 | 1.52 | 0.22 |
| Left | 176.0 ± 23.38 | 170.6 ± 37.79 | 180.5 ± 18.49 | 151.5 ± 37.42 | 1.79 | 0.17 |
|
| ||||||
| Flexor peak torque %BW (N·m/kg) | ||||||
| Right | 112.0 ± 17.03 | 114.0 ± 20.72 | 114.3 ± 26.42 | 100.8 ± 18.41 | 1.14 | 0.35 |
| Left | 110.1 ± 18.93 | 113.8 ± 26.57 | 112.6 ± 18.87 | 94.4 ± 23.37 | 1.87 | 0.15 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
% BW, % body weight.