Susan E Waisbren1, Caroline M Weipert2, Rebecca C Walsh2, Carter R Petty3, Robert C Green4. 1. Boston Children's Hospital; Harvard Medical School; and susan.waisbren@childrens.harvard.edu. 2. Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Boston Children's Hospital; 4. Harvard Medical School; and Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: When parents of newborns are presented with the hypothetical possibility of obtaining genomic sequencing (GS) for their newborn infants immediately after birth, they express substantial interest. This study examined associations between expressed interest in GS and demographic and psychosocial variables some months after birth. METHODS: A total of 1096 parents were enrolled in a study on GS of newborns shortly after the birth of their infants, before discharge from the postpartum floor. Of these parents, 663 (60.5%) completed a follow-up survey 2 to 28 months later that queried their interest in GS for their infant and whether they received worrisome health information during pregnancy, labor, and delivery. They were also administered the Parenting Stress Index. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with interest in GS of newborns. RESULTS: Of parents, 76.1% indicated at least some interest in GS. A 10-point increase on the Parenting Stress Index was associated with an increase in the odds of having some interest in GS (odds ratio: 1.15; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.32). Age, gender, race, ethnicity, marital status, education, anxiety, and whether this was the first biological child were not significantly associated with interest in GS. Receiving worrisome health information was associated with greater interest in GS but this did not reach significance (odds ratio: 1.42; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-2.12). CONCLUSIONS: This hypothetical survey study suggests that previous experiences leading to worrisome health information and parenting stress need to be considered when GS is offered. Additional research, currently underway, is exploring factors associated with real-life parental choices around whether to obtain GS of their newborns.
BACKGROUND: When parents of newborns are presented with the hypothetical possibility of obtaining genomic sequencing (GS) for their newborn infants immediately after birth, they express substantial interest. This study examined associations between expressed interest in GS and demographic and psychosocial variables some months after birth. METHODS: A total of 1096 parents were enrolled in a study on GS of newborns shortly after the birth of their infants, before discharge from the postpartum floor. Of these parents, 663 (60.5%) completed a follow-up survey 2 to 28 months later that queried their interest in GS for their infant and whether they received worrisome health information during pregnancy, labor, and delivery. They were also administered the Parenting Stress Index. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with interest in GS of newborns. RESULTS: Of parents, 76.1% indicated at least some interest in GS. A 10-point increase on the Parenting Stress Index was associated with an increase in the odds of having some interest in GS (odds ratio: 1.15; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.32). Age, gender, race, ethnicity, marital status, education, anxiety, and whether this was the first biological child were not significantly associated with interest in GS. Receiving worrisome health information was associated with greater interest in GS but this did not reach significance (odds ratio: 1.42; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-2.12). CONCLUSIONS: This hypothetical survey study suggests that previous experiences leading to worrisome health information and parenting stress need to be considered when GS is offered. Additional research, currently underway, is exploring factors associated with real-life parental choices around whether to obtain GS of their newborns.
Authors: Jonathan S Berg; Pankaj B Agrawal; Donald B Bailey; Alan H Beggs; Steven E Brenner; Amy M Brower; Julie A Cakici; Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy; Kee Chan; Flavia Chen; Robert J Currier; Dmitry Dukhovny; Robert C Green; Julie Harris-Wai; Ingrid A Holm; Brenda Iglesias; Galen Joseph; Stephen F Kingsmore; Barbara A Koenig; Pui-Yan Kwok; John Lantos; Steven J Leeder; Megan A Lewis; Amy L McGuire; Laura V Milko; Sean D Mooney; Richard B Parad; Stacey Pereira; Joshua Petrikin; Bradford C Powell; Cynthia M Powell; Jennifer M Puck; Heidi L Rehm; Neil Risch; Myra Roche; Joseph T Shieh; Narayanan Veeraraghavan; Michael S Watson; Laurel Willig; Timothy W Yu; Tiina Urv; Anastasia L Wise Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jan M Friedman; Martina C Cornel; Aaron J Goldenberg; Karla J Lister; Karine Sénécal; Danya F Vears Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 3.063
Authors: Julia C van Campen; Elizabeth S A Sollars; Rebecca C Thomas; Clare M Bartlett; Antonio Milano; Matthew D Parker; Jennifer Dawe; Peter R Winship; Gerrard Peck; Darren Grafham; Richard J Kirk; James R Bonham; Anne C Goodeve; Ann Dalton Journal: Int J Neonatal Screen Date: 2019-11-05
Authors: Kurt D Christensen; Megan Bell; Carrie L B Zawatsky; Lauren N Galbraith; Robert C Green; Allison M Hutchinson; Leila Jamal; Jessica L LeBlanc; Jennifer R Leonhard; Michelle Moore; Lisa Mullineaux; Natasha Petry; Dylan M Platt; Sherin Shaaban; April Schultz; Bethany D Tucker; Joel Van Heukelom; Elizabeth Wheeler; Emilie S Zoltick; Catherine Hajek Journal: Front Genet Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Megan A Lewis; Alex Stine; Ryan S Paquin; Carol Mansfield; Dallas Wood; Christine Rini; Myra I Roche; Cynthia M Powell; Jonathan S Berg; Donald B Bailey Journal: Genet Med Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 8.822