| Literature DB >> 26729045 |
Shu-Fei Fu1, Chung-Wah Cheng2, Li Zhang3, Linda Li-Dan Zhong2, Wai Kun2, Jia Lin1, Bo-Li Zhang1, Yong-Yan Wang4, Hong-Cai Shang5,6, Zhao-Xiang Bian7,8.
Abstract
Case reports are valuable clinical evidence in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). However, the general reporting quality is suboptimal. A working group comprising 20 members was set up to develop systematic recommendations on case report in Chinese medicine (CARC). The working group (CARC group) developed a primary checklist based on reviewing the general reporting quality of case reports in TCM and thorough internal discussion. Two-round consensus process had been carried out among clinical experts, evidence-based medicine methodologists, medical journal editors and clinical practitioners with designated questionnaire embedded with the primary checklist. In total, 118 participants from 17 provinces of China and Korea completed the questionnaires. Their feedback was analyzed and discussed by the CARC group. The checklist was amended accordingly, and the final version, comprising 16-item, is presented here. Under the framework of CARC recommendations, the reporting quality of case reports in TCM can be improved.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese medicine; case report; reporting recommendations
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26729045 DOI: 10.1007/s11655-015-2121-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin J Integr Med ISSN: 1672-0415 Impact factor: 1.978