Literature DB >> 19804709

Guidelines for submitting adverse event reports for publication.

William Kelly1, Felix Arellano, Joanne Barnes, Ulf Bergman, Ralph Edwards, Alina Fernandez, Stephen Freedman, David Goldsmith, Kui Huang, Judith Jones, Rachel McLeay, Nicholas Moore, Rosie Stather, Thierry Trenque, William Troutman, Eugène van Puijenbroek, Frank Williams, Robert Wise.   

Abstract

Publication of case reports describing suspected adverse effects of drugs and medical products that include herbal and complementary medicines, vaccines and other biologicals and devices is important for postmarketing surveillance. Publication lends credence to important signals raised in these adverse event reports. Unfortunately, deficiencies in vital information in published cases can often limit the value of such reports by failing to provide enough details for either (i) a differential diagnosis or provisional assessment of cause-effect association, or (ii) a reasonable pharmacological or biological explanation. Properly described, a published report of one or more adverse events can provide a useful signal of possible risks associated with the use of a drug or medical product which might warrant further exploration. A review conducted by the Task Force authors found that many major journals have minimal requirements for publishing adverse event reports and some have none at all. Based on a literature review and our collective experience in reviewing adverse event case reports in regulatory, academic and industry settings, we have identified information that we propose should always be considered for inclusion in a report submitted for publication. These guidelines have been endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE) and the International Society of Pharmacovigilance (ISoP) and are freely available on the societies' web sites. Their widespread distribution is encouraged. ISPE and ISoP urge biomedical journals to adopt these guidelines and apply them to case reports submitted for publication. They also encourage schools of medicine, pharmacy, and nursing to incorporate them into the relevant curricula that address the detection, evaluation and reporting of suspected drug or other medical product adverse events.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19804709     DOI: 10.2515/therapie/2009041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Therapie        ISSN: 0040-5957            Impact factor:   2.070


  4 in total

Review 1.  Case series in drug safety: a review to determine characteristics and quality.

Authors:  Claire Nour Abou Chakra; Antoine Pariente; Marion Pinet; Lenhangmbong Nkeng; Nicholas Moore; Yola Moride
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Consensus-based recommendations for case report in Chinese medicine (CARC).

Authors:  Shu-Fei Fu; Chung-Wah Cheng; Li Zhang; Linda Li-Dan Zhong; Wai Kun; Jia Lin; Bo-Li Zhang; Yong-Yan Wang; Hong-Cai Shang; Zhao-Xiang Bian
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 1.978

3.  Completeness of Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reports Sent by General Practitioners to a Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre: A Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Geneviève Durrieu; Julien Jacquot; Mathilde Mège; Emmanuelle Bondon-Guitton; Vanessa Rousseau; François Montastruc; Jean-Louis Montastruc
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  The quality of reports on cervical arterial dissection following cervical spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Shari Wynd; Michael Westaway; Sunita Vohra; Greg Kawchuk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.