| Literature DB >> 26728718 |
Adriana A E Biney1, F Nii-Amoo Dodoo2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescent sexual activity, especially among the urban poor, remains a challenge. Despite numerous interventions and programs to address the negative consequences arising from early and frequent sexual activity among youth in sub-Saharan Africa, including Ghana, only slight progress has been made. A plausible explanation is that our understanding of what adolescents think about sex and about their own sexuality is poor. In that sense, examining how adolescents in urban poor communities think about their sexual readiness, and identifying characteristics associated with that sexual self-concept dimension, should deepen our understanding of this topical issue.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26728718 PMCID: PMC4700634 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2620-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Percentage distribution of sexual readiness items
| Items | Frequency | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Ready for sex | ||
| 0 | 153 | 78.1 |
| 1 | 13 | 6.6 |
| 2 | 30 | 15.3 |
| Not young for sex | ||
| 0 | 135 | 68.9 |
| 1 | 8 | 4.1 |
| 2 | 53 | 27.0 |
| Not wrong for sex | ||
| 0 | 137 | 69.9 |
| 1 | 12 | 6.1 |
| 2 | 47 | 24.0 |
| Total | 196 | 100.0 |
Source: RIPS Urban Health and Poverty Project, 2011
0-disagree; 1-neutral; 2-agree
Percentage distribution of sexual readiness, background and sexual characteristics of respondents by gender
| Characteristics | Total | Female | Male | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freq | % | Freq | % | Freq | % | |
| Sexual readiness (Dependent variable) | ||||||
| 0 | 106 | 54.1 | 57 | 55.9 | 49 | 52.1 |
| 1 | 5 | 2.6 | 2 | 2.0 | 3 | 3.2 |
| 2 | 37 | 18.9 | 20 | 19.6 | 17 | 18.1 |
| 3 | 5 | 2.6 | 3 | 2.9 | 2 | 2.1 |
| 4 | 27 | 13.8 | 15 | 14.7 | 12 | 12.8 |
| 5 | 5 | 2.6 | 3 | 2.9 | 2 | 2.1 |
| 6 | 11 | 5.6 | 2 | 2.0 | 9 | 9.6 |
| Socio-demographic Characteristics | ||||||
| Age | ||||||
| 12–14 | 68 | 34.7 | 38 | 37.3 | 30 | 31.9 |
| 15–17 | 66 | 33.7 | 31 | 30.4 | 35 | 37.2 |
| 18–19 | 62 | 31.6 | 33 | 32.4 | 29 | 30.9 |
| Highest educational level attained | ||||||
| Primary and below | 65 | 33.2 | 36 | 35.3 | 29 | 30.9 |
| Junior High School (JHS) | 88 | 44.9 | 49 | 48.0 | 39 | 41.5 |
| Senior High School (SHS) | 43 | 21.9 | 17 | 16.7 | 26 | 27.7 |
| Socio-cultural Characteristics | ||||||
| Religious service attendance in past month | ||||||
| At least once a week | 113 | 57.6 | 56 | 54.9 | 57 | 60.6 |
| At least once a month | 39 | 19.9 | 23 | 22.6 | 16 | 17.0 |
| Never | 44 | 22.5 | 23 | 22.6 | 21 | 22.3 |
| Ethnicity | ||||||
| Akan | 43 | 21.9 | 23 | 22.6 | 20 | 21.3 |
| Ga/Dangme | 131 | 66.8 | 65 | 63.7 | 66 | 70.2 |
| Other | 22 | 11.3 | 14 | 13.7 | 8 | 8.5 |
| Locality | ||||||
| James Town | 78 | 39.8 | 41 | 40.2 | 37 | 39.4 |
| Ussher Town | 118 | 60.2 | 61 | 59.8 | 57 | 60.6 |
| Family Characteristics | ||||||
| Mother's highest educational level attained | ||||||
| None/Pre-school | 30 | 15.3 | 17 | 16.7 | 13 | 13.8 |
| Primary | 28 | 14.3 | 12 | 11.8 | 16 | 17.0 |
| Secondary | 82 | 41.8 | 41 | 40.2 | 41 | 43.6 |
| Don't Know | 56 | 28.6 | 32 | 31.4 | 24 | 25.5 |
| Living arrangements | ||||||
| Parent/parent & relative | 146 | 74.5 | 74 | 72.6 | 72 | 76.6 |
| Other relative/non-relative/alone | 47 | 24.0 | 26 | 25.5 | 21 | 22.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parents’ marital status | ||||||
| Currently married | 72 | 36.7 | 37 | 36.3 | 35 | 37.2 |
| Not currently married | 61 | 31.1 | 29 | 28.4 | 32 | 34.0 |
| Never married | 22 | 11.2 | 13 | 12.8 | 9 | 9.6 |
| Parent(s) dead | 39 | 19.9 | 22 | 21.6 | 17 | 18.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Wealth index | ||||||
| Poorest | 39 | 19.9 | 17 | 16.7 | 22 | 23.4 |
| Poorer | 42 | 21.4 | 22 | 21.6 | 20 | 21.3 |
| Middle | 39 | 19.9 | 18 | 17.6 | 21 | 22.3 |
| Richer | 37 | 18.9 | 22 | 21.6 | 15 | 16.0 |
| Richest | 34 | 17.4 | 20 | 19.6 | 14 | 14.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sexual communication | ||||||
| With parents only | 101 | 51.5 | 54 | 52.9 | 47 | 50.0 |
| With friends only | 42 | 21.4 | 27 | 26.5 | 15 | 16.0 |
| With both parents and friends | 19 | 9.7 | 8 | 7.8 | 11 | 11.7 |
| With other(s) | 34 | 17.4 | 13 | 12.8 | 21 | 22.3 |
| Sexual Characteristics | ||||||
| Coital experiencea | ||||||
| No | 156 | 79.6 | 75 | 73.5 | 81 | 86.2 |
| Yes | 40 | 20.4 | 27 | 26.5 | 13 | 13.8 |
| Negative sexual experience | ||||||
| No | 158 | 80.6 | 77 | 75.5 | 81 | 86.2 |
| Yes | 38 | 19.4 | 25 | 24.5 | 13 | 13.8 |
| Exposure to pornographic moviesa | ||||||
| No | 121 | 61.7 | 73 | 71.6 | 48 | 51.1 |
| Yes | 73 | 37.3 | 28 | 27.4 | 45 | 47.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total | 196 | 100.0 | 102 | 100.0 | 94 | 100.0 |
Source: RIPS Urban Health and Poverty Project, 2011
aSignificantly different by gender at p < 0.05
Percentage distribution of adolescents who ever encountered a negative sexual experience; were forced to have sex, engage in a sex act or both
| Characteristic | All | Girls | Boys | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freq | % | Freq | % | Freq | % | |
| Negative sexual experience | ||||||
| No | 158 | 80.6 | 77 | 75.5 | 81 | 86.2 |
| Yes | 38 | 19.4 | 25 | 24.5 | 13 | 13.8 |
| Total | 196 | 100.0 | 102 | 100.0 | 94 | 100.0 |
| Negative sexual experience categories | ||||||
| Forced sex only | 6 | 15.8 | 5 | 20.0 | 1 | 7.7 |
| Forced into sex act only | 22 | 57.9 | 12 | 48.0 | 10 | 76.9 |
| Forced into both | 10 | 26.3 | 8 | 32.0 | 2 | 15.4 |
| Total | 38 | 100.0 | 25 | 100.0 | 13 | 100.00 |
Source: RIPS Urban Health and Poverty Project, 2011
Ordered regression models displaying sexual, socio-demographic, −cultural and family correlates of adolescents’ sexual readiness
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Odds Ratio | 95 % Confidence Interval | Odds Ratio | 95 % Confidence Interval |
| Coital experience | ||||
| No (RC) | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| Yes | 9.339*** | 4.18–20.88 | 19.585*** | 6.85–56.03 |
| Negative sexual experience | ||||
| No (RC) | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| Yes | 1.014 | 0.47–2.17 | 1.362 | 0.58–3.19 |
| Exposure to pornography | ||||
| No (RC) | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| Yes | 2.043* | 1.12–3.73 | 2.355* | 1.07–5.19 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male (RC) | 1.000 | |||
| Female | 0.420* | 0.20–0.87 | ||
| Age group | ||||
| 12–14 (RC) | 1.000 | |||
| 15–17 | 1.031 | 0.39–2.74 | ||
| 18–19 | 0.825 | 0.26–2.56 | ||
| Highest educational level attained | ||||
| Primary and below (RC) | 1.000 | |||
| JHS | 0.790 | 0.33–1.90 | ||
| SHS | 0.493 | 0.16–1.52 | ||
| Religious service attendance in past month | ||||
| At least once a week (RC) | 1.000 | |||
| At least once a month | 0.914 | 0.38–2.19 | ||
| Never | 1.301 | 0.56–3.01 | ||
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Akan (RC) | 1.000 | |||
| Ga/Dangme | 3.427* | 1.29–9.07 | ||
| Other | 4.212* | 1.11–16.04 | ||
| Locality | ||||
| James Town (RC) | 1.000 | |||
| Ussher Town | 1.776 | 0.86–3.651 | ||
| Mother's highest educational level attained | ||||
| None/Pre-school (RC) | 1.000 | |||
| Primary | 2.276 | 0.65–7.99 | ||
| Secondary | 1.805 | 0.65–5.02 | ||
| Don't know | 0.961 | 0.32–2.84 | ||
| Living arrangements | ||||
| Parent(s)/parent & relative (RC) | 1.000 | |||
| Other relative/non-relative/alone | 1.251 | 0.57–2.76 | ||
| Household wealth quintile | ||||
| Poorest (RC) | 1.000 | |||
| Poorer | 3.574* | 1.27–10.06 | ||
| Middle | 1.905 | 0.65–5.61 | ||
| Richer | 0.996 | 0.29–3.39 | ||
| Richest | 0.821 | 0.24–2.78 | ||
| Parents' marital status | ||||
| Currently married (RC) | 1.000 | |||
| Not currently married | 0.452+ | 0.18–1.12 | ||
| Never married | 0.670 | 0.21–2.11 | ||
| Parent(s) dead | 1.261 | 0.46–3.44 | ||
| Sexual Communication | ||||
| With parent(s) only (RC) | 1.000 | |||
| With friend only | 0.433+ | 0.18–1.06 | ||
| With both parents and friends | 0.645 | 0.18–2.29 | ||
| With other(s) | 2.268+ | 0.90–5.71 | ||
| /cut1 | 0.859 | 0.45-1.26 | 2.422 | 0.54-4.30 |
| /cut2 | 0.990 | 0.58-1.40 | 2.601 | 0.71-4.49 |
| /cut3 | 2.143 | 1.63-2.66 | 4.030 | 2.06-6.00 |
| /cut4 | 2.342 | 1.81-2.88 | 4.293 | 2.32-6.27 |
| /cut5 | 3.698 | 2.98-4.42 | 5.770 | 3.72-7.82 |
| /cut6 | 4.151 | 3.35-4.95 | 6.276 | 4.18-8.37 |
Source: RIPS Urban Health and Poverty Project, 2011
***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05; +p < 0.10; RC = Reference Category
Model 1: Pseudo R2 = 0.1063, n = 194; Model 2: Pseudo R2 = 0.2085, n = 184
Proportionality of odds test: Model 1: p > chi2 = 0.9474; Model 2: p > chi2 = 0. 4705
Distribution of predicted probabilities of adolescents at their various degrees of sexual readiness for significant variables in the model
| Sexual Readiness Categories | ‘Sexually active’ only | ‘Exposed to pornography’ only | ‘Males’ only | ‘Ga/Dangme’ only | ‘Other ethnicity’ only | ‘Poorer wealth’ only | All significant characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.1074 | 0.4246 | 0.4449 | 0.4547 | 0.2583 | 0.3180 | 0.0031 |
| 1 | 0.0185 | 0.0444 | 0.0447 | 0.0448 | 0.0359 | 0.0402 | 0.0006 |
| 2 | 0.2495 | 0.3176 | 0.3105 | 0.3069 | 0.3407 | 0.3414 | 0.0116 |
| 3 | 0.0635 | 0.0409 | 0.0389 | 0.0379 | 0.0587 | 0.0523 | 0.0045 |
| 4 | 0.3351 | 0.1271 | 0.1190 | 0.1153 | 0.2147 | 0.1780 | 0.0613 |
| 5 | 0.0763 | 0.0175 | 0.0162 | 0.0156 | 0.0343 | 0.0266 | 0.0465 |
| 6 | 0.1498 | 0.0279 | 0.0258 | 0.0248 | 0.0574 | 0.0435 | 0.8724 |
Source: RIPS Urban Health and Poverty Project, 2011