PURPOSE:Teenage girls in low-income urban settings are at an elevated risk for HIV, sexually transmitted infections, and unintended pregnancies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a sexual risk-reduction (SRR) intervention, supplemented with postintervention booster sessions, targeting low-income, urban, sexually active teenage girls. METHOD: Randomized controlled trial in which sexually active urban adolescent girls (n = 738) recruited in a midsize northeastern U.S. city were randomized to a theory-based SRR intervention or to a structurally equivalent health promotion control group. Assessments and behavioral data were collected using audio computer-assisted self-interview at baseline, then at 3, 6, and 12 months postintervention. Both interventions included four small-group sessions and two booster sessions. RESULTS: Relative to girls in the control group, girls receiving the SRR intervention were more likely to be sexually abstinent; if sexually active, they showed decreases in (a) total episodes of vaginal sex at all follow-ups, (b) number of unprotected vaginal sex acts at 3 and 12 months, and (c) total number of sex partners at 6 months. Medical record audits for girls recruited from a clinical setting (n = 322) documented a 50% reduction in positive pregnancy tests at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Theory-based behavioral interventions tailored to adolescent girls can help to reduce sexual risk and may also reduce unintended pregnancies. Although sexually active at enrollment, many of the girls receiving the intervention were more likely to practice secondary abstinence. Continued refinement of SRR interventions for girls is needed to ensure they are feasible, appealing, and effective.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Teenage girls in low-income urban settings are at an elevated risk for HIV, sexually transmitted infections, and unintended pregnancies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a sexual risk-reduction (SRR) intervention, supplemented with postintervention booster sessions, targeting low-income, urban, sexually active teenage girls. METHOD: Randomized controlled trial in which sexually active urban adolescent girls (n = 738) recruited in a midsize northeastern U.S. city were randomized to a theory-based SRR intervention or to a structurally equivalent health promotion control group. Assessments and behavioral data were collected using audio computer-assisted self-interview at baseline, then at 3, 6, and 12 months postintervention. Both interventions included four small-group sessions and two booster sessions. RESULTS: Relative to girls in the control group, girls receiving the SRR intervention were more likely to be sexually abstinent; if sexually active, they showed decreases in (a) total episodes of vaginal sex at all follow-ups, (b) number of unprotected vaginal sex acts at 3 and 12 months, and (c) total number of sex partners at 6 months. Medical record audits for girls recruited from a clinical setting (n = 322) documented a 50% reduction in positive pregnancy tests at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Theory-based behavioral interventions tailored to adolescent girls can help to reduce sexual risk and may also reduce unintended pregnancies. Although sexually active at enrollment, many of the girls receiving the intervention were more likely to practice secondary abstinence. Continued refinement of SRR interventions for girls is needed to ensure they are feasible, appealing, and effective.
Authors: M P Carey; L S Braaten; S A Maisto; J R Gleason; A D Forsyth; L E Durant; B C Jaworski Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: J Greenberg; M Hennessy; R MacGowan; D Celentano; V Gonzales; N Van Devanter; J Lifshay Journal: Eval Health Prof Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: David H Barker; Rebecca R Swenson; Larry K Brown; Bonita F Stanton; Peter A Vanable; Michael P Carey; Robert F Valois; Ralph J Diclemente; Laura F Salazar; Daniel Romer Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2012-04
Authors: Michael P Carey; Kate B Carey; Stephen A Maisto; Kerstin E E Schroder; Peter A Vanable; Christopher M Gordon Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Craig F Garfield; Greg Duncan; Sarah Peters; Joshua Rutsohn; Thomas W McDade; Emma K Adam; Rebekah Levine Coley; Patricia Lindsay Chase-Lansdale Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Isabel Ruiz-Perez; Matthew Murphy; Guadalupe Pastor-Moreno; Antonio Rojas-García; Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Tamara Vehige Calise; Wendy Chow; Katelyn F Doré; Michael J O'Brien; Elizabeth R Heitz; Rebecca R Millock Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Chioma Oringanje; Martin M Meremikwu; Hokehe Eko; Ekpereonne Esu; Anne Meremikwu; John E Ehiri Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-02-03