Literature DB >> 26728512

What Risk Factors and Characteristics Are Associated With Late-presenting Dislocations of the Hip in Infants?

Kishore Mulpuri1,2, Emily K Schaeffer3,4, Janice Andrade4, Wudbhav N Sankar5, Nicole Williams6,7, Travis H Matheney8, Scott J Mubarak9, Peter J Cundy6,7, Charles T Price10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) are diagnosed within the first 3 months of life. However, late-presenting DDH (defined as a diagnosis after 3 months of age) does occur and often results in more complex treatment and increased long-term complications. Specific risk factors involved in late-presenting DDH are poorly understood, and clearly defining an associated set of factors will aid in screening, detection, and prevention of this condition. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Using a multicenter database of patients with DDH, we sought to determine whether there were differences in (1) risk factors or (2) the nature of the dislocation (laterality and joint laxity) when comparing patients with early versus late presentation.
METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a multicenter database of patients with dislocated hips was conducted from 2010 to 2014. Baseline demographics for fetal presentation (cephalic/breech), birth presentation (vaginal/cesarean), birth weight, maternal age, maternal parity, gestational age, family history, and swaddling history of patients were compared among nine different sites for patients who were enrolled at age younger than 3 months and those enrolled between 3 and 18 months of age. A total of 392 patients were enrolled at baseline between 0 and 18 months of age with at least one dislocated hip. Of that group, 259 patients were younger than 3 months of age and 133 were 3 to 18 months of age. The proportion of patients with DDH who were enrolled and followed at the nine participating centers was 98%.
RESULTS: A univariate/multivariate analysis was performed comparing key baseline demographics between early- and late-presenting patients. After controlling for relevant confounding variables, two variables were identified as risk factors for late-presenting DDH as compared with early-presenting: cephalic presentation at birth and swaddling history. Late-presenting patients were more likely to have had a cephalic presentation than early-presenting patients (88% [117 of 133] versus 65% [169 or 259]; odds ratio [OR], 5.366; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.44-11.78; p < 0.001). Additionally, late-presenting patients were more likely to have had a history of swaddling (40% [53 of 133] versus 25% [64 of 259]; OR, 2.053; 95% CI, 1.22-3.45; p = 0.0016). No difference was seen for sex (p = 0.63), birth presentation (p = 0.088), birth weight (p = 0.90), maternal age (p = 0.39), maternal parity (p = 0.54), gestational age (p = 0.42), or family history (p = 0.11) between the two groups. Late presenters were more likely to present with an irreducible dislocation than early presenters (56% [82 of 147 hips] versus 19% [63 of 333 hips]; OR, 5.407; 95% CI, 3.532-8.275; p < 0.001) and were less likely to have a bilateral dislocation (11% [14 of 133] versus 28% [73 of 259]; OR, 0.300; 95% CI, 0.162-0.555; p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Those presenting with DDH after 3 months of age have fewer of the traditional risk factors for DDH (such as breech birth), which may explain the reason for a missed diagnosis at a younger age. In addition, swaddling history was more common in late-presenting infants. A high index of suspicion for DDH should be maintained for all infants, not just those with traditional risk factors for DDH. Further investigation is required to determine if swaddling is a risk factor for the development of hip dislocations in older infants. More rigorous examination into traditional screening methods should also be performed to determine whether current screening is sufficient and whether late-presenting dislocations are present early and missed or whether they develop over time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26728512      PMCID: PMC4814418          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4668-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  41 in total

1.  Missed or developmental dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  F W Ilfeld; G W Westin; M Makin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Early failure of Pavlik harness treatment for developmental hip dysplasia: clinical and ultrasound predictors.

Authors:  J A Lerman; J B Emans; M B Millis; J Share; D Zurakowski; J R Kasser
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.324

3.  Indicators of successful use of the Pavlik harness in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  H Atalar; U Sayli; O Y Yavuz; I Uraş; H Dogruel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  L M French; F R Dietz
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.292

5.  The natural history of congenital dislocation of the hip: a critical review.

Authors:  J H Wedge; M J Wasylenko
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1978 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Effect of ultrasound screening on the rate of first operative procedures for developmental hip dysplasia in Germany.

Authors:  Rüdiger von Kries; Nicola Ihme; Doris Oberle; Anette Lorani; Renee Stark; Lutz Altenhofen; Fritz Uwe Niethard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Is there a difference between the epidemiologic characteristics of hip dislocation diagnosed early and late?

Authors:  J F Haasbeek; J G Wright; D M Hedden
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Late diagnosis in congenital dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  E Heikkilä; S Ryöppy; I Louhimo
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1984-06

9.  Use of the Pavlik harness in congenital dislocation of the hip. An analysis of failures of treatment.

Authors:  R G Viere; J G Birch; J A Herring; J W Roach; C E Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Developmental dysplasia of the hip: a new approach to incidence.

Authors:  V Bialik; G M Bialik; S Blazer; P Sujov; F Wiener; M Berant
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip: ultrasound, radiography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christian A Barrera; Sara A Cohen; Wudbhav N Sankar; Victor M Ho-Fung; Raymond W Sze; Jie C Nguyen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-11-04

2.  Routine screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip by chiropractors: a case report of late diagnosis in an infant.

Authors:  Christian J Fludder; Braden G Keil
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2020-08

Review 3.  Practice Essentials of Imaging in Early Diagnosis of DDH.

Authors:  Alka Karnik; Ashwin Lawande; Malini Ashwin Lawande; Deepak Patkar; Alaric Aroojis; Nidhi Bhatnagar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 1.033

4.  Demographic and Practice Variability Amongst Indian Centres in a Multicentre Prospective Observational Study on Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Authors:  Deepika Pinto; Alaric Aroojis; Hitesh Shah; Sandeep Patwardhan; K Venkatadass; Chittaranjan Sahu; Emily Schaeffer; Kishore Mulpuri
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 1.033

5.  Swaddling Practices in an Indian Institution: Are they Hip-Safe? A Survey of Paediatricians, Nurses and Caregivers.

Authors:  Deepika A Pinto; Alaric Aroojis; Rujuta Mehta
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Universal or selective ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip? A discussion of the key issues.

Authors:  R Biedermann; D M Eastwood
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  Musculoskeletal ultrasound: a useful tool for diagnosis of hip developmental dysplasia: One single-center experience.

Authors:  Simona Mureşan; Maria Oana Mărginean; Septimiu Voidăzan; Ionuţ Vlasa; Ioana Sîntean
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Sequential one-stage combined procedure for treating bilateral developmental hip dysplasia after walking age.

Authors:  Haibing Li; Wensong Ye; Lujie Xu; Li Li; Weiwei Zhu; Zefeng Zheng
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Profile of Patients Diagnosed with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Authors:  Renan de Oliveira Barbosa; Elaine Pinto Albernaz
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-10-09

10.  Developmental dysplasia of the hip screening programme in Chile.

Authors:  Matías F Sepúlveda; Juan A Pérez; Esteban A Saban; Luis E Castañeda; Dalia F Sepúlveda; Estefanía A M Birrer
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.