Literature DB >> 2672694

Immersion versus contact technique in the measurement of axial length by ultrasound.

T Olsen1, P J Nielsen.   

Abstract

The axial length was measured by A-scan in 60 cataractous patients using a non-contact (immersion) and a contact technique. The mean axial length was found to be 23.49 mm with the immersion technique and 23.35 mm with the contact technique, using the same Sonometrics transducer probe. The difference of 0.14 mm (+/- 0.19) was significant at the 0.01 level. The difference should be taken into account when evaluating the accuracy of IOL calculation, and may call for different empirical corrections of the axial length with different ultrasonic equipment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2672694     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1989.tb00732.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)        ISSN: 0001-639X


  13 in total

1.  IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  H Eleftheriadis
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Mirjana Bjeloš Rončević; Mladen Bušić; Ivan Cima; Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer; Damir Bosnar; Daliborka Miletić
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Axial length measurements by contact and immersion techniques in pediatric eyes with cataract.

Authors:  Rupal H Trivedi; M Edward Wilson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Refractive outcomes comparison between the Lenstar LS 900® optical biometry and immersion A-scan ultrasound.

Authors:  Palanyraj Naicker; Siva Sundralingam; Mohammadreza Peyman; Azida Juana; Nor Fadhilah Mohamad; Maung Maung Win; Angela Loo; Visvaraja Subrayan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Axial length measurement using partial coherence interferometry in myopic children: repeatability of the measurement and comparison with refractive components.

Authors:  Shuhei Kimura; Satoshi Hasebe; Manabu Miyata; Ichiro Hamasaki; Hiroshi Ohtsuki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Predictability of intraocular lens calculation and early refractive status: the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study.

Authors:  Deborah K VanderVeen; Azhar Nizam; Michael J Lynn; Erick D Bothun; Scott K McClatchey; David R Weakley; Lindreth G DuBois; Scott R Lambert
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03

7.  Comparison of intraocular lens power prediction using immersion ultrasound and optical biometry with and without formula optimization.

Authors:  Gabor Nemeth; Attila Nagy; Andras Berta; Laszlo Modis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Accuracy of different lens power calculation formulas in patients with phacomorphic glaucoma.

Authors:  Seyed Ali Tabatabaei; Melika Samadi; Mohammad Soleimani; Hosein Fonoodi; Sepideh Ghods; Bahman Inanloo
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-13

9.  Outcomes of cataract operations in extreme high axial myopia.

Authors:  Jasmine K M Lam; Tommy C Y Chan; Alex L K Ng; Vanissa W S Chow; Victoria W Y Wong; Vishal Jhanji
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Measurement of optic disc size: equivalence of methods to correct for ocular magnification.

Authors:  D F Garway-Heath; A R Rudnicka; T Lowe; P J Foster; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.