Literature DB >> 26726269

Nursing Practicum in Gynaecology and Obstetrics - Early Influence Possibilities for a Specialty.

R Kasch1, P Baum1, M Dokter2, M Zygmunt3, J Wirkner4, A Lange5, S Fröhlich6, H Merk1, J Kasch3.   

Abstract

Background: The shortage of skilled personnel is ubiquitous, basic and further training is a key aspect in the recruitment of new medical colleagues. The significance of the nursing practicum in its function as gateway to the gynaecology and obstetrics discipline is practically unexplored.
Methods: In an online questionnaire, medical students in all German faculties were questioned about the practica in their courses. The questionnaire reached 9079 medical students. 149 participants in nursing practica were selectively asked to answer 140 questions. We analysed those students who could, on the basis of their experiences in nursing practica, imagine undertaking an internship (clinical elective) in gynaecology (internship yes "Iy") separately from those who could not or were still undecided (internship no "In" or, respectively, internship perhaps "Ip").
Results: Altogether 149 medical students who participated in a nursing practicum in the gynaecology discipline were selected, of these 94.9 % were female. 92 (61.7 %) of the students replied that, after their gynaecological nursing practicum, they wanted to undertake an internship in gynaecology (Iy); 39 (26.2 %) answered negatively (In) and 18 (12.1 %) were still undecided (Ip). With regard to the parameters gender, age and duration of study, there were no significant differences among the 3 groups (χ2 0.83). Besides the didactic and professional quality of the training, Iy also mentioned having had a higher practical orientation. They attained their aims more frequently, were better integrated in the health-care team and acquired more practical competences. Satisfaction with the practicum was evaluated as highest among the Iy. Discussion: Those students who could imagine taking an internship in gynaecology were seen to be more satisfied with their practica than those participants who declined or were undecided. The high proportion of females is an early indicator for a feminisation of the specialty. If necessary this could be countered with the help of nursing management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feminisation; gynaecological nursing practicum; gynaecology; lack of skilled personnel; medical students; obstetrics

Year:  2015        PMID: 26726269      PMCID: PMC4686369          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1558053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  10 in total

1.  [Medical students and their career choices. Preferred specialty, where and how to work].

Authors:  A Heinz; R Jacob
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  [An educational skills programme for undergraduate training in orthopaedic and trauma surgery].

Authors:  S Froehlich; U Obertacke; M Ruesseler; P Schwanitz; A Roth; H Gollwitzer; F Walcher; R Kasch; W Mittelmeier
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 0.923

3.  The career expectations of medical students: findings of a nationwide survey in Germany.

Authors:  Bernhard Gibis; Andreas Heinz; Rüdiger Jacob; Carl-Heinz Müller
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  [Generation 55+: leadership and motivation of generations in hospitals].

Authors:  C E Schmidt; J Möller; K Schmidt; M U Gerbershagen; F Wappler; V Limmroth; S A Padosch; M Bauer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [Shortage and need of physicians in Germany? Questions addressed to health services research].

Authors:  G Adler; J-H v d Knesebeck
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  [Aspirations of medical students: "planning for a secure career" - results of an online-survey among students at five medical schools in Germany].

Authors:  K Götz; A Miksch; K Hermann; A Loh; K Kiolbassa; S Joos; J Steinhäuser
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 0.628

7.  [Generation Y : recruitment, retention and development].

Authors:  C E Schmidt; J Möller; K Schmidt; M U Gerbershagen; F Wappler; V Limmroth; S A Padosch; M Bauer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  [Do female medical graduates have different views on professional work and workload compared to their male colleagues? Results of a multicenter postal survey in Germany].

Authors:  B Gedrose; C Wonneberger; J Jünger; B P Robra; A Schmidt; C Stosch; R Wagner; M Scherer; K Pöge; K Rothe; H van den Bussche
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 0.628

9.  Work-life balance of German gynecologists: a web-based survey on satisfaction with work and private life.

Authors:  Katharina Hancke; Wilmar Igl; Bettina Toth; Astrid Bühren; Nina Ditsch; Rolf Kreienberg
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.344

10.  Attitudes of medical students towards general practice: Effects of gender, a general practice clerkship and a modern curriculum.

Authors:  Carsten Kruschinski; Birgitt Wiese; Jörg Eberhard; Eva Hummers-Pradier
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2011-02-04
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  [Promoting young academics in anesthesiology: factors for an attractive internship].

Authors:  D Scheffel; J Wirkner; S Adler; G Wassilew; K Dragowsky; R Seemann; S Fröhlich; R Kasch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 1.052

2.  The role of gender-specific factors in the choice of specialty training in obstetrics and gynecology: results from a survey among medical students in Germany.

Authors:  Maximilian Riedel; André Hennigs; Anna Maria Dobberkau; Caroline Riedel; Till Johannes Bugaj; Christoph Nikendei; Niklas Amann; Anne Karge; Gabriel Eisenkolb; Maria Tensil; Florian Recker; Fabian Riedel
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 2.344

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.