OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utilization of follow-up imaging after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in nationally representative data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results data linked to Medicare records, we identified patients with RCC who received nephrectomy from 1991 to 2007. Patients were stratified by tumor stage. Postoperative chest and abdominal imaging (including chest x-ray, computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance imaging; abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance imaging) was assessed. Observed surveillance imaging frequency was compared to published protocols. Predictors of initial and continued yearly surveillance imaging were identified. RESULTS: Agreement between observed imaging frequency and evidence-based surveillance protocols was low, particularly for patients with T2-T4 disease. For patients who were not censored before 13 months, initial abdominal and chest surveillance imaging was obtained in 69% and 78% of patients, respectively. By year 5, 28% and 39% of patients with high-risk disease (T3 or T4), as compared to 21% and 25% of patients with low to moderate risk disease (T1 and T2), received yearly surveillance abdominal and chest imaging, respectively. High-risk disease was predictive of initial chest (odds ratio [OR] = 1.38) and abdominal (OR = 1.6) imaging, as well as continued yearly chest (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73) and abdominal (HR = 0.74) imaging surveillance. For abdominal imaging, more contemporary year of surgery was predictive of initial (1997-2001, OR = 1.6; 2002-2007, OR = 2.4) and continued yearly surveillance (1997-2001, HR = 0.82; 2002-2007; HR = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: In the Medicare population, surveillance imaging is performed in a limited number of patients following nephrectomy for RCC. However, increasing tumor stage is predictive of both increased chest and abdominal imaging surveillance.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utilization of follow-up imaging after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in nationally representative data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results data linked to Medicare records, we identified patients with RCC who received nephrectomy from 1991 to 2007. Patients were stratified by tumor stage. Postoperative chest and abdominal imaging (including chest x-ray, computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance imaging; abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance imaging) was assessed. Observed surveillance imaging frequency was compared to published protocols. Predictors of initial and continued yearly surveillance imaging were identified. RESULTS: Agreement between observed imaging frequency and evidence-based surveillance protocols was low, particularly for patients with T2-T4 disease. For patients who were not censored before 13 months, initial abdominal and chest surveillance imaging was obtained in 69% and 78% of patients, respectively. By year 5, 28% and 39% of patients with high-risk disease (T3 or T4), as compared to 21% and 25% of patients with low to moderate risk disease (T1 and T2), received yearly surveillance abdominal and chest imaging, respectively. High-risk disease was predictive of initial chest (odds ratio [OR] = 1.38) and abdominal (OR = 1.6) imaging, as well as continued yearly chest (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73) and abdominal (HR = 0.74) imaging surveillance. For abdominal imaging, more contemporary year of surgery was predictive of initial (1997-2001, OR = 1.6; 2002-2007, OR = 2.4) and continued yearly surveillance (1997-2001, HR = 0.82; 2002-2007; HR = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: In the Medicare population, surveillance imaging is performed in a limited number of patients following nephrectomy for RCC. However, increasing tumor stage is predictive of both increased chest and abdominal imaging surveillance.
Authors: John S Lam; Oleg Shvarts; John T Leppert; Allan J Pantuck; Robert A Figlin; Arie S Belldegrun Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Sanjay G Patel; David F Penson; Baldeep Pabla; Peter E Clark; Michael S Cookson; Sam S Chang; S Duke Herrell; Joseph A Smith; Daniel A Barocas Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-01-15 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Alexander Kutikov; Marc C Smaldone; Brian L Egleston; Brandon J Manley; Daniel J Canter; Jay Simhan; Stephen A Boorjian; Rosalia Viterbo; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Sherri M Donat; Mireya Diaz; Jay Todd Bishoff; Jonathan A Coleman; Philipp Dahm; Ithaar H Derweesh; S Duke Herrell; Susan Hilton; Eric Jonasch; Daniel W Lin; Victor E Reuter; Sam S Chang Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: David C Miller; Christopher S Saigal; Joan L Warren; Meryl Leventhal; Dennis Deapen; Mousumi Banerjee; Julie Lai; Jan Hanley; Mark S Litwin Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-06-06 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Alice Dragomir; Armen Aprikian; Anil Kapoor; Antonio Finelli; Frédéric Pouliot; Ricardo Rendon; Peter C Black; Ronald Moore; Rodney H Breau; Jun Kawakami; Darrell Drachenberg; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Simon Tanguay Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2017-12-11