PURPOSE: The purpose of this guideline is to provide a clinical framework for follow-up of clinically localized renal neoplasms undergoing active surveillance, or following definitive therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review identified published articles in the English literature between January 1999 and 2011 relevant to key questions specified by the Panel related to kidney neoplasms and their follow-up (imaging, renal function, markers, biopsy, prognosis). Study designs consisting of clinical trials (randomized or not), observational studies (cohort, case-control, case series) and systematic reviews were included. RESULTS: Guideline statements provided guidance for ongoing evaluation of renal function, usefulness of renal biopsy, timing/type of radiographic imaging and formulation of future research initiatives. A lack of studies precluded risk stratification beyond tumor staging; therefore, for the purposes of postoperative surveillance guidelines, patients with localized renal cancers were grouped into strata of low- and moderate- to high-risk for disease recurrence based on pathological tumor stage. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation for patients on active surveillance and following definitive therapy for renal neoplasms should include physical examination, renal function, serum studies and imaging and should be tailored according to recurrence risk, comorbidities and monitoring for treatment sequelae. Expert opinion determined a judicious course of monitoring/surveillance that may change in intensity as surgical/ablative therapies evolve, renal biopsy accuracy improves and more long-term follow-up data are collected. The beneficial impact of careful follow-up will also need critical evaluation as further study is completed.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this guideline is to provide a clinical framework for follow-up of clinically localized renal neoplasms undergoing active surveillance, or following definitive therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review identified published articles in the English literature between January 1999 and 2011 relevant to key questions specified by the Panel related to kidney neoplasms and their follow-up (imaging, renal function, markers, biopsy, prognosis). Study designs consisting of clinical trials (randomized or not), observational studies (cohort, case-control, case series) and systematic reviews were included. RESULTS: Guideline statements provided guidance for ongoing evaluation of renal function, usefulness of renal biopsy, timing/type of radiographic imaging and formulation of future research initiatives. A lack of studies precluded risk stratification beyond tumor staging; therefore, for the purposes of postoperative surveillance guidelines, patients with localized renal cancers were grouped into strata of low- and moderate- to high-risk for disease recurrence based on pathological tumor stage. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation for patients on active surveillance and following definitive therapy for renal neoplasms should include physical examination, renal function, serum studies and imaging and should be tailored according to recurrence risk, comorbidities and monitoring for treatment sequelae. Expert opinion determined a judicious course of monitoring/surveillance that may change in intensity as surgical/ablative therapies evolve, renal biopsy accuracy improves and more long-term follow-up data are collected. The beneficial impact of careful follow-up will also need critical evaluation as further study is completed.
Authors: Emily A Knott; John F Swietlik; Katherine C Longo; Rao F Watson; Chelsey M Green; E Jason Abel; Meghan G Lubner; J Louis Hinshaw; Amanda R Smolock; Zhen Xu; Fred T Lee; Timothy J Ziemlewicz Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Y A M Kuijpers; R P Meijer; G N Jonges; J de Jong; J L H R Bosch; S Horenblas; A Bex Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Peter G Wagstaff; Abel Swaan; Alexandre Ingels; Patricia J Zondervan; Otto M van Delden; Dirk J Faber; Ton G van Leeuwen; Jean J de la Rosette; Daniel M de Bruin; M Pilar Laguna Pes Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2015-03-30 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Ercan Malkoc; Daniel Ramirez; Onder Kara; Matthew J Maurice; Ryan J Nelson; Peter A Caputo; Jihad H Kaouk Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 4.226