Literature DB >> 26723551

Physics considerations for single-isocenter, volumetric modulated arc radiosurgery for treatment of multiple intracranial targets.

Carl Stanhope1, Zheng Chang2, Zhiheng Wang2, Fang-Fang Yin2, Grace Kim2, Joseph K Salama2, John Kirkpatrick2, Justus Adamson3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to address challenges associated with single-isocenter radiosurgery for multiple intracranial targets (SIRMIT) including increased sensitivity to rotational uncertainties (resulting from distance of the targets from isocenter) as well as potential for decreased plan quality from larger multileaf collimator width >4 cm from isocenter. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We evaluated the effect that a 6 degrees-of-freedom couch correction had on localization uncertainty for SIRMIT using thermoplastic mask immobilization. Required setup margin was determined from rotation of the skull and mask (setup kV cone beam computed tomography relative to planning computed tomography). Intraoperational margin was determined from skull rotation within the mask (difference between pre- and posttreatment cone beam computed tomography). We also investigated 4 isocenter placement strategies: volume centroid, centroid of equally weighted points (1 per target), centroid of points weighted by inverse of volume, and Eclipse's built-in method.
RESULTS: When no 6 degrees-of-freedom couch correction is performed after initial setup, a 0.35-mm margin is required per centimeter of target-isocenter separation to account for 95% of rotational uncertainties at initial setup. This margin is reduced to 0.10 mm/cm of target-isocenter separation to account for intraoperative rotational uncertainties when the initial setup uncertainty is eliminated via image guided 6 degrees-of-freedom couch correction. Analysis of 11 multitarget plans (37 targets) showed that conformity index and gradient index improved with decreasing distance from isocenter, this trend being more pronounced for targets <1 mL. Alternative isocenters aimed at decreasing distance of small targets improved their gradient index, but resulted in poorer dose indices for large targets. Mean distance from isocenter was smallest for the centroid of equally weighted points (4.1 ± 1.6cm vs 4.2-4.5cm).
CONCLUSIONS: Rotational corrections via image guidance are necessary for SIRMIT with a thermoplastic mask for immobilization. There is a clear tradeoff between dosimetric quality of small and large targets that should be considered carefully when placing the isocenter.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26723551     DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2015.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1879-8500


  20 in total

1.  Is there a volume threshold of brain metastases for Linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy?

Authors:  Chieh-Wen Liu; Saeed Ahmed; Tara Gray; Tianjun Ma; Young-Bin Cho; Gennady Neyman; Samuel Chao; John Suh; Ping Xia
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2021

2.  Single-isocenter multiple-target stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: dosimetric evaluation of two automated treatment planning systems.

Authors:  Giorgio Hamid Raza; Luca Capone; Paolo Tini; Martina Giraffa; Piercarlo Gentile; Giuseppe Minniti
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.309

3.  The effect of MLC leaf width in single-isocenter multi-target radiosurgery with volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Zhanerke Abisheva; Scott R Floyd; Joseph K Salama; John Kirkpatrick; Fang-Fang Yin; Michael J Moravan; William Giles; Justus Adamson
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2019

4.  SBRT treatment of multiple extracranial oligometastases using a single isocenter with distinct optimizations.

Authors:  Michael Trager; Joseph Salama; Fang-Fang Yin; Justus Adamson
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2017

5.  Restricted single isocenter for multiple targets dynamic conformal arc (RSIMT DCA) technique for brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning.

Authors:  Jenghwa Chang; A Gabriella Wernicke; Susan C Pannullo
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2018

6.  Single isocenter SRS using CAVMAT offers improved robustness to commissioning and treatment delivery uncertainty compared to VMAT.

Authors:  Edward T Cullom; Yuqing Xia; Kai-Cheng Chuang; Zachary W Gude; Yana Zlateva; Justus D Adamson; William M Giles
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Radiobiological evaluation considering setup error on single-isocenter irradiation in stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Hisashi Nakano; Satoshi Tanabe; Ryuta Sasamoto; Takeshi Takizawa; Satoru Utsunomiya; Madoka Sakai; Toshimichi Nakano; Atsushi Ohta; Motoki Kaidu; Hiroyuki Ishikawa
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases.

Authors:  Dror Limon; Frances McSherry; James Herndon; John Sampson; Peter Fecci; Justus Adamson; Zhiheng Wang; Fang-Fang Yin; Scott Floyd; John Kirkpatrick; Grace J Kim
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-09-11

9.  Technical Note: Using k-means clustering to determine the number and position of isocenters in MLC-based multiple target intracranial radiosurgery.

Authors:  Adam D Yock; Gwe-Ya Kim
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Institutional experience with SRS VMAT planning for multiple cranial metastases.

Authors:  Åse Ballangrud; Li Cheng Kuo; Laura Happersett; Seng Boh Lim; Kathryn Beal; Yoshiya Yamada; Margie Hunt; James Mechalakos
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.