Literature DB >> 26723490

Evaluation of optimal extracellular vesicle small RNA isolation and qRT-PCR normalisation for serum and urine.

Rachel E Crossland1, Jean Norden2, Louis A Bibby2, Joanna Davis2, Anne M Dickinson2.   

Abstract

MicroRNAs are small regulatory molecules that demonstrate useful biomarker potential. They have been recognised in biofluids, where they are protected from degradation by encapsulation into extracellular vesicles (EVs). A number of commercial products are available for the isolation of EVs and their RNA content; however, extensive protocol comparisons are lacking. Furthermore, robust qRT-PCR assessment of microRNA expression within EVs is problematic, as endogenous controls (ECs) previously used in cellular samples may not be present. This study compares EV isolation and RNA extraction methods (EV precipitation reagents, RNA isolation kits and ultracentrifugation) from serum or urine samples and evaluates suitable ECs for incorporation into qRT-PCR analysis. Results were assessed by electron microscopy, nanoparticle tracking analysis and bioanalyzer concentrations. The stability of 8 ECs was compared for both serum and urine EV RNA and retrospectively validated in independent cohorts (serum n=55, urine n=50). The Life Technologies precipitation reagent gave superior serum EV recovery compared to SBI reagent, as assessed by NTA size distribution, increased RNA concentration, and lower small RNA Ct values. Similarly, the Norgen Biotek Urine Exosome RNA Isolation Kit gave improved results for urine EV isolation compared to ultracentrifugation, when determined by the same parameters. The Qiagen miRNeasy™ RNA isolation kit gave suitable serum EV RNA concentrations compared to other kits, as assessed by Bioanalyzer and small RNA qRT-PCR. Small RNAs HY3 (S.D=1.77, CoV=6.2%) and U6 (S.D=2.14, CoV=8.6%) were selected as optimal ECs for serum EV microRNA expression analysis, while HY3 (S.D=1.67, CoV=6.5%) and RNU48 (S.D=1.85, CoV=5.3%) were identified as suitable for urine studies. In conclusion, this study identifies optimal methods for isolation of serum and urine EV RNA, and suitable ECs for normalisation of qRT-PCR studies. Such reports should aid in the standardisation of EV microRNA data, particularly for biomarker studies.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endogenous control; Extracellular vesicle; MicroRNA; qRT-PCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26723490     DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2015.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol Methods        ISSN: 0022-1759            Impact factor:   2.303


  30 in total

Review 1.  The choice of endogenous controls in exosomal microRNA assessments from biofluids.

Authors:  G Occhipinti; M Giulietti; G Principato; F Piva
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-07-20

2.  A method for extracting and characterizing RNA from urine: For downstream PCR and RNAseq analysis.

Authors:  Kun Zhou; Monique A Spillman; Kian Behbakht; Julia M Komatsu; Juan E Abrahante; Douglas Hicks; Brent Schotl; Evan Odean; Kenneth L Jones; Michael W Graner; Lynne T Bemis
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 3.  A review on comparative studies addressing exosome isolation methods from body fluids.

Authors:  Tânia Soares Martins; Margarida Vaz; Ana Gabriela Henriques
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.478

4.  Quantitative and Multiplex Detection of Extracellular Vesicle-Derived MicroRNA via Rolling Circle Amplification within Encoded Hydrogel Microparticles.

Authors:  Dana Al Sulaiman; Nidhi Juthani; Patrick S Doyle
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 11.092

Review 5.  Extracellular Vesicles and Vascular Injury: New Insights for Radiation Exposure.

Authors:  Stéphane Flamant; Radia Tamarat
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Urine RNA Processing in a Clinical Setting: Comparison of 3 Protocols.

Authors:  Megan S Bradley; Marie-Helene Boudreau; Carole Grenier; Zhiqing Huang; Susan K Murphy; Nazema Y Siddiqui
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  Urinary micro-RNA expressions and protein concentrations may differentiate bladder cancer patients from healthy controls.

Authors:  Gökçe Güllü Amuran; Ilker Tinay; Deniz Filinte; Can Ilgin; Irem Peker Eyüboğlu; Mustafa Akkiprik
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  A Comparative Study of Serum Exosome Isolation Using Differential Ultracentrifugation and Three Commercial Reagents.

Authors:  Inas Helwa; Jingwen Cai; Michelle D Drewry; Arthur Zimmerman; Michael B Dinkins; Mariam Lotfy Khaled; Mutsa Seremwe; W Michael Dismuke; Erhard Bieberich; W Daniel Stamer; Mark W Hamrick; Yutao Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Serum microRNA miR-501-3p as a potential biomarker related to the progression of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Norikazu Hara; Masataka Kikuchi; Akinori Miyashita; Hiroyuki Hatsuta; Yuko Saito; Kensaku Kasuga; Shigeo Murayama; Takeshi Ikeuchi; Ryozo Kuwano
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 7.801

10.  ExoProK: A Practical Method for the Isolation of Small Extracellular Vesicles from Pleural Effusions.

Authors:  Dionysios Antonopoulos; Irene Tsilioni; Sophia Tsiara; Eirini Moustaka; Spyridon Ladias; Garyfallia Perlepe; Theoharis C Theoharides; Konstantinos I Gourgoulianis; Nikolaos A A Balatsos
Journal:  Methods Protoc       Date:  2021-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.