Jeffrey M Testani1, Jennifer S Hanberg2, Susan Cheng2, Veena Rao2, Chukwuma Onyebeke2, Olga Laur2, Alexander Kula2, Michael Chen2, F Perry Wilson2, Andrew Darlington2, Lavanya Bellumkonda2, Daniel Jacoby2, W H Wilson Tang2, Chirag R Parikh2. 1. From the Department of Internal Medicine (J.M.T., M.C., F.P.W., L.B., D.J., C.R.P.) and Program of Applied Translational Research (J.M.T., J.S., S.C., V.R., C.O., O.L., A.K., F.P.W., C.R.P.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Piedmont Heart Institute, Fayetteville, GA (A.D.); and Section of Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, OH (W.H.W.T.). jeffrey.testani@yale.edu. 2. From the Department of Internal Medicine (J.M.T., M.C., F.P.W., L.B., D.J., C.R.P.) and Program of Applied Translational Research (J.M.T., J.S., S.C., V.R., C.O., O.L., A.K., F.P.W., C.R.P.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Piedmont Heart Institute, Fayetteville, GA (A.D.); and Section of Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, OH (W.H.W.T.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Removal of excess sodium and fluid is a primary therapeutic objective in acute decompensated heart failure and commonly monitored with fluid balance and weight loss. However, these parameters are frequently inaccurate or not collected and require a delay of several hours after diuretic administration before they are available. Accessible tools for rapid and accurate prediction of diuretic response are needed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Based on well-established renal physiological principles, an equation was derived to predict net sodium output using a spot urine sample obtained 1 or 2 hours after loop diuretic administration. This equation was then prospectively validated in 50 acute decompensated heart failure patients using meticulously obtained timed 6-hour urine collections to quantify loop diuretic-induced cumulative sodium output. Poor natriuretic response was defined as a cumulative sodium output of <50 mmol, a threshold that would result in a positive sodium balance with twice-daily diuretic dosing. Following a median dose of 3 mg (2-4 mg) of intravenous bumetanide, 40% of the population had a poor natriuretic response. The correlation between measured and predicted sodium output was excellent (r=0.91; P<0.0001). Poor natriuretic response could be accurately predicted with the sodium prediction equation (area under the curve =0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.89-1.0; P<0.0001). Clinically recorded net fluid output had a weaker correlation (r=0.66; P<0.001) and lesser ability to predict poor natriuretic response (area under the curve =0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.63-0.89; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In patients being treated for acute decompensated heart failure, poor natriuretic response can be predicted soon after diuretic administration with excellent accuracy using a spot urine sample.
BACKGROUND: Removal of excess sodium and fluid is a primary therapeutic objective in acute decompensated heart failure and commonly monitored with fluid balance and weight loss. However, these parameters are frequently inaccurate or not collected and require a delay of several hours after diuretic administration before they are available. Accessible tools for rapid and accurate prediction of diuretic response are needed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Based on well-established renal physiological principles, an equation was derived to predict net sodium output using a spot urine sample obtained 1 or 2 hours after loop diuretic administration. This equation was then prospectively validated in 50 acute decompensated heart failurepatients using meticulously obtained timed 6-hour urine collections to quantify loop diuretic-induced cumulative sodium output. Poor natriuretic response was defined as a cumulative sodium output of <50 mmol, a threshold that would result in a positive sodium balance with twice-daily diuretic dosing. Following a median dose of 3 mg (2-4 mg) of intravenous bumetanide, 40% of the population had a poor natriuretic response. The correlation between measured and predicted sodium output was excellent (r=0.91; P<0.0001). Poor natriuretic response could be accurately predicted with the sodium prediction equation (area under the curve =0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.89-1.0; P<0.0001). Clinically recorded net fluid output had a weaker correlation (r=0.66; P<0.001) and lesser ability to predict poor natriuretic response (area under the curve =0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.63-0.89; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In patients being treated for acute decompensated heart failure, poor natriuretic response can be predicted soon after diuretic administration with excellent accuracy using a spot urine sample.
Authors: Syed S Ali; Chad C Olinger; Paul A Sobotka; Thom G A Dahle; Matthew C Bunte; Donnevan Blake; Andrew J Boyle Journal: Congest Heart Fail Date: 2009 Jan-Feb
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Rajendra H Mehta; Joseph G Rogers; Vic Hasselblad; Gudaye Tasissa; Cynthia Binanay; Robert M Califf; Christopher M O'Connor Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Elena-Laura Antohi; Andrew P Ambrosy; Sean P Collins; Ali Ahmed; Vlad Anton Iliescu; Gad Cotter; Peter S Pang; Javed Butler; Ovidiu Chioncel Journal: Am J Ther Date: 2019 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 2.688
Authors: Daniel Z Hodson; Matthew Griffin; Devin Mahoney; Parinita Raghavendra; Tariq Ahmad; Jeffrey Turner; F Perry Wilson; W H Wilson Tang; Veena S Rao; Sean P Collins; Wilfried Mullens; Jeffrey M Testani Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Jozine M Ter Maaten; Veena S Rao; Jennifer S Hanberg; F Perry Wilson; Lavanya Bellumkonda; Mahlet Assefa; J Sam Broughton; Julie D'Ambrosi; W H Wilson Tang; Kevin Damman; Adriaan A Voors; David H Ellison; Jeffrey M Testani Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Veena S Rao; Jeffrey M Turner; Matthew Griffin; Devin Mahoney; Jennifer Asher; Sangchoon Jeon; Peter S Yoo; Nabil Boutagy; Attila Feher; Albert Sinusas; F Perry Wilson; Fredric Finkelstein; Jeffrey M Testani Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jessica H Huston; Robinson Ferre; Peter S Pang; Ovidiu Chioncel; Javed Butler; Sean Collins Journal: Am J Ther Date: 2018 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.688
Authors: Veena S Rao; Juan B Ivey-Miranda; Zachary L Cox; Ralph Riello; Matthew Griffin; James Fleming; Richard Soucier; Prasama Sangkachand; Margaret O'Brien; Francine LoRusso; Julie D'Ambrosi; Keith Churchwell; Devin Mahoney; Lavanya Bellumkonda; Jennifer L Asher; Christopher Maulion; Jeffrey M Turner; F Perry Wilson; Sean P Collins; Jeffrey M Testani Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 24.094