Veena S Rao1, Jeffrey M Turner2, Matthew Griffin1, Devin Mahoney1, Jennifer Asher3, Sangchoon Jeon4, Peter S Yoo5, Nabil Boutagy1, Attila Feher6, Albert Sinusas7, F Perry Wilson8, Fredric Finkelstein2, Jeffrey M Testani1. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine (V.S.R., M.G., D.M., N.B., J.M. Testani), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology (J.M. Turner, F.F.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 3. Department of Comparative Medicine (J.A.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 4. Yale School of Nursing, West Haven, CT (S.J.). 5. Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Immunology (P.S.Y.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 6. Department of Internal Medicine (A.F.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 7. Department of Medicine, Yale Translational Research Imaging Center, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine (A.S.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 8. Program of Applied Translational Research (F.P.W.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Loop diuretics have well-described toxicities, and loss of response to these agents is common. Alternative strategies are needed for the maintenance of euvolemia in heart failure (HF). Nonrenal removal of sodium directly across the peritoneal membrane (direct sodium removal [DSR]) with a sodium-free osmotic solution should result in extraction of large quantities of sodium with limited off-target solute removal. METHODS: This article describes the preclinical development and first-in-human proof of concept for DSR. Sodium-free 10% dextrose was used as the DSR solution. Porcine experiments were conducted to investigate the optimal dwell time, safety, and scalability and to determine the effect of experimental heart failure. In the human study, participants with end-stage renal disease on peritoneal dialysis (PD) underwent randomization and crossover to either a 2-hour dwell with 1 L DSR solution or standard PD solution (Dianeal 4.25% dextrose, Baxter). The primary end point was completion of the 2-hour dwell without significant discomfort or adverse events, and the secondary end point was difference in sodium removal between DSR and standard PD solution. RESULTS: Porcine experiments revealed that 1 L DSR solution removed 4.1±0.4 g sodium in 2 hours with negligible off-target solute removal and overall stable serum electrolytes. Increasing the volume of DSR solution cycled across the peritoneum increased sodium removal and substantially decreased plasma volume (P=0.005). In the setting of experimental heart failure with elevated right atrial pressure, sodium removal was ≈4 times greater than in healthy animals (P<0.001). In the human proof-of-concept study, DSR solution was well tolerated and not associated with significant discomfort or adverse events. Plasma electrolyte concentrations were stable, and off-target solute removal was negligible. Sodium removal was substantially higher with DSR (4.5±0.4 g) compared with standard PD solution (1.0±0.3 g; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: DSR was well tolerated in both animals and human subjects and produced substantially greater sodium removal than standard PD solution. Additional research evaluating the use of DSR as a method to prevent and treat hypervolemia in heart failure is warranted. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03801226.
BACKGROUND: Loop diuretics have well-described toxicities, and loss of response to these agents is common. Alternative strategies are needed for the maintenance of euvolemia in heart failure (HF). Nonrenal removal of sodium directly across the peritoneal membrane (direct sodium removal [DSR]) with a sodium-free osmotic solution should result in extraction of large quantities of sodium with limited off-target solute removal. METHODS: This article describes the preclinical development and first-in-human proof of concept for DSR. Sodium-free 10% dextrose was used as the DSR solution. Porcine experiments were conducted to investigate the optimal dwell time, safety, and scalability and to determine the effect of experimental heart failure. In the human study, participants with end-stage renal disease on peritoneal dialysis (PD) underwent randomization and crossover to either a 2-hour dwell with 1 L DSR solution or standard PD solution (Dianeal 4.25% dextrose, Baxter). The primary end point was completion of the 2-hour dwell without significant discomfort or adverse events, and the secondary end point was difference in sodium removal between DSR and standard PD solution. RESULTS: Porcine experiments revealed that 1 L DSR solution removed 4.1±0.4 g sodium in 2 hours with negligible off-target solute removal and overall stable serum electrolytes. Increasing the volume of DSR solution cycled across the peritoneum increased sodium removal and substantially decreased plasma volume (P=0.005). In the setting of experimental heart failure with elevated right atrial pressure, sodium removal was ≈4 times greater than in healthy animals (P<0.001). In the human proof-of-concept study, DSR solution was well tolerated and not associated with significant discomfort or adverse events. Plasma electrolyte concentrations were stable, and off-target solute removal was negligible. Sodium removal was substantially higher with DSR (4.5±0.4 g) compared with standard PD solution (1.0±0.3 g; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:DSR was well tolerated in both animals and human subjects and produced substantially greater sodium removal than standard PD solution. Additional research evaluating the use of DSR as a method to prevent and treat hypervolemia in heart failure is warranted. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03801226.
Authors: Marvin A Konstam; Mihai Gheorghiade; John C Burnett; Liliana Grinfeld; Aldo P Maggioni; Karl Swedberg; James E Udelson; Faiez Zannad; Thomas Cook; John Ouyang; Christopher Zimmer; Cesare Orlandi Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-03-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Christophe Bureau; Danielle Adebayo; Mael Chalret de Rieu; Laure Elkrief; Dominique Valla; Markus Peck-Radosavljevic; Anne McCune; Victor Vargas; Macarena Simon-Talero; Juan Cordoba; Paolo Angeli; Silvia Rosi; Stewart MacDonald; Massimo Malago; Maria Stepanova; Zobair M Younossi; Claudia Trepte; Randall Watson; Oleg Borisenko; Sun Sun; Neil Inhaber; Rajiv Jalan Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Marvin A Konstam; Michael Kiernan; Arthur Chandler; Ravi Dhingra; Freny Vaghaiwalla Mody; Howard Eisen; W Herbert Haught; Lynne Wagoner; Divya Gupta; Richard Patten; Paul Gordon; Kenneth Korr; Russell Fileccia; Susan J Pressler; Douglas Gregory; Patricia Wedge; Douglas Dowling; Matthew Romeling; Jeremy M Konstam; Joseph M Massaro; James E Udelson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: G S Francis; C Benedict; D E Johnstone; P C Kirlin; J Nicklas; C S Liang; S H Kubo; E Rudin-Toretsky; S Yusuf Journal: Circulation Date: 1990-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Frederik H Verbrugge; Petra Nijst; Matthias Dupont; Joris Penders; W H Wilson Tang; Wilfried Mullens Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Melis Sahinoz; Supisara Tintara; Serpil Muge Deger; Aseel Alsouqi; Rachelle L Crescenzi; Cindy Mambungu; Andrew Vincz; Olivia Mason; Heather L Prigmore; Andrew Guide; Thomas G Stewart; David Harrison; Friedrich C Luft; Jens Titze; T Alp Ikizler Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2020-12-22 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Bourne L Auguste; Arnav Agarwal; Ali Z Ibrahim; Michael Y Girsberger; Zita Abreu; Rory F McQuillan; Joanne M Bargman Journal: Can J Kidney Health Dis Date: 2020-12-08