Adrian G Sacher1, Suzanne E Dahlberg2, Jennifer Heng3, Stacy Mach3, Pasi A Jänne4, Geoffrey R Oxnard1. 1. Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts2Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts4Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts2Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts5Belfer Institute for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massac.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosed in young patients is rare, and the genomics and clinical characteristics of this disease are poorly understood. In contrast, the diagnosis of other cancers at a young age has been demonstrated to define unique disease biology. Herein, we report on the association of young age with targetable genomic alterations and prognosis in a cohort of 2237 patients with NSCLC. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between young age at diagnosis and the presence of a potentially targetable genomic alteration, disease prognosis, and natural history. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of all 2237 patients with NSCLC who were genotyped at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between January 2002 and December 2014 were identified. Tumor genotype, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected and studied at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between age and mutation status, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were fitted for survival analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The frequency of targetable genomic alterations by defined age categories as well as the association of these age groups with survival. Age categories used in this analysis were younger than 40, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and 70 years or older. RESULTS: A cohort of 2237 patients with NSCLC was studied. Of the 2237 participants, 1939 (87%) had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, 269 (12%) had NSCLC not otherwise specified, and 29 (1%) had squamous histologic findings; 1396 (63%) had either stage IIIB or IV cancers; and median (range) age was 62 (20-95) years. We found that gene mutations for EGFR (P = .02) and ALK (P < .001) were associated with cancer diagnosis at a younger age, and a similar trend existed for ERBB2 (P = .15) and ROS1 (P = .10) but not BRAF V600E (P = .43). Among patients tested for all 5 targetable genomic alterations (n = 1325), younger age was associated with an increased frequency of a targetable genotype (P < .001). Those diagnosed at 50 years or younger have a 59% increased likelihood of harboring a targetable genotype. While presence of a potentially targetable genomic alteration treated with a targeted agent was associated with improved survival, the youngest and oldest age groups had similarly poor outcomes even when a targetable genotype was present. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Younger age is associated with an increased likelihood of harboring a targetable genotype and is an underappreciated clinical biomarker in NSCLC. The survival of young patients with NCSLC is unexpectedly poor compared with other age groups, suggesting more aggressive disease biology. These findings underscore the importance of comprehensive genotyping, including next-generation sequencing, in younger patients with lung cancer.
IMPORTANCE: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosed in young patients is rare, and the genomics and clinical characteristics of this disease are poorly understood. In contrast, the diagnosis of other cancers at a young age has been demonstrated to define unique disease biology. Herein, we report on the association of young age with targetable genomic alterations and prognosis in a cohort of 2237 patients with NSCLC. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between young age at diagnosis and the presence of a potentially targetable genomic alteration, disease prognosis, and natural history. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of all 2237 patients with NSCLC who were genotyped at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between January 2002 and December 2014 were identified. Tumor genotype, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected and studied at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between age and mutation status, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were fitted for survival analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The frequency of targetable genomic alterations by defined age categories as well as the association of these age groups with survival. Age categories used in this analysis were younger than 40, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and 70 years or older. RESULTS: A cohort of 2237 patients with NSCLC was studied. Of the 2237 participants, 1939 (87%) had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, 269 (12%) had NSCLC not otherwise specified, and 29 (1%) had squamous histologic findings; 1396 (63%) had either stage IIIB or IV cancers; and median (range) age was 62 (20-95) years. We found that gene mutations for EGFR (P = .02) and ALK (P < .001) were associated with cancer diagnosis at a younger age, and a similar trend existed for ERBB2 (P = .15) and ROS1 (P = .10) but not BRAFV600E (P = .43). Among patients tested for all 5 targetable genomic alterations (n = 1325), younger age was associated with an increased frequency of a targetable genotype (P < .001). Those diagnosed at 50 years or younger have a 59% increased likelihood of harboring a targetable genotype. While presence of a potentially targetable genomic alteration treated with a targeted agent was associated with improved survival, the youngest and oldest age groups had similarly poor outcomes even when a targetable genotype was present. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Younger age is associated with an increased likelihood of harboring a targetable genotype and is an underappreciated clinical biomarker in NSCLC. The survival of young patients with NCSLC is unexpectedly poor compared with other age groups, suggesting more aggressive disease biology. These findings underscore the importance of comprehensive genotyping, including next-generation sequencing, in younger patients with lung cancer.
Authors: Kristin Bergethon; Alice T Shaw; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Ryohei Katayama; Christine M Lovly; Nerina T McDonald; Pierre P Massion; Christina Siwak-Tapp; Adriana Gonzalez; Rong Fang; Eugene J Mark; Julie M Batten; Haiquan Chen; Keith D Wilner; Eunice L Kwak; Jeffrey W Clark; David P Carbone; Hongbin Ji; Jeffrey A Engelman; Mari Mino-Kenudson; William Pao; A John Iafrate Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Paul K Paik; Melissa L Johnson; Sandra P D'Angelo; Camelia S Sima; Daphne Ang; Snjezana Dogan; Vincent A Miller; Marc Ladanyi; Mark G Kris; Gregory J Riely Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Benjamin Levy; Alexander Spira; Daniel Becker; Tracey Evans; Ian Schnadig; D Ross Camidge; Julie E Bauman; Diana Hausman; Luke Walker; John Nemunaitis; Charles M Rudin; Balazs Halmos; Daniel W Bowles Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Lynette M Sholl; Dara L Aisner; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Lynne D Berry; Dora Dias-Santagata; Ignacio I Wistuba; Heidi Chen; Junya Fujimoto; Kelly Kugler; Wilbur A Franklin; A John Iafrate; Marc Ladanyi; Mark G Kris; Bruce E Johnson; Paul A Bunn; John D Minna; David J Kwiatkowski Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Dorothy Romanus; Stephanie Cardarella; David Cutler; Mary Beth Landrum; Neal I Lindeman; G Scott Gazelle Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Elly Barry; Daniel J DeAngelo; Donna Neuberg; Kristen Stevenson; Mignon L Loh; Barbara L Asselin; Ronald D Barr; Luis A Clavell; Craig A Hurwitz; Albert Moghrabi; Yvan Samson; Marshall Schorin; Harvey J Cohen; Stephen E Sallan; Lewis B Silverman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R A Larson; R K Dodge; C P Burns; E J Lee; R M Stone; P Schulman; D Duggan; F R Davey; R E Sobol; S R Frankel Journal: Blood Date: 1995-04-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Hanna Fredholm; Sonja Eaker; Jan Frisell; Lars Holmberg; Irma Fredriksson; Henrik Lindman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-11-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marco Galvez-Nino; Rossana Ruiz; Joseph A Pinto; Katia Roque; Raul Mantilla; Luis E Raez; Luis Mas Journal: Lung Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: D Isla; M Majem; N Viñolas; A Artal; A Blasco; E Felip; P Garrido; J Remón; M Baquedano; J M Borrás; M Die Trill; R García-Campelo; O Juan; C León; P Lianes; F López-Ríos; L Molins; M Á Planchuelo; M Cobo; L Paz-Ares; J M Trigo; J de Castro Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Vicente Morales-Oyarvide; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Cristina R Ferrone; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; Dushyant V Sahani; Ilaria Pergolini; Marc A Attiyeh; Mohammad Al Efishat; Neda Rezaee; Ralph H Hruban; Jin He; Matthew J Weiss; Peter J Allen; Christopher L Wolfgang; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-10-18 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack; Justin F Gainor; Rebecca L Porter; Katherine R Schultz; Benjamin J Solomon; Sara Stevens; Christopher G Azzoli; Lecia V Sequist; Inga T Lennes; Alice T Shaw Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2016-06-11 Impact factor: 15.609