Literature DB >> 26720396

A land use regression model for ambient ultrafine particles in Montreal, Canada: A comparison of linear regression and a machine learning approach.

Scott Weichenthal1, Keith Van Ryswyk2, Alon Goldstein3, Scott Bagg3, Maryam Shekkarizfard4, Marianne Hatzopoulou5.   

Abstract

Existing evidence suggests that ambient ultrafine particles (UFPs) (<0.1µm) may contribute to acute cardiorespiratory morbidity. However, few studies have examined the long-term health effects of these pollutants owing in part to a need for exposure surfaces that can be applied in large population-based studies. To address this need, we developed a land use regression model for UFPs in Montreal, Canada using mobile monitoring data collected from 414 road segments during the summer and winter months between 2011 and 2012. Two different approaches were examined for model development including standard multivariable linear regression and a machine learning approach (kernel-based regularized least squares (KRLS)) that learns the functional form of covariate impacts on ambient UFP concentrations from the data. The final models included parameters for population density, ambient temperature and wind speed, land use parameters (park space and open space), length of local roads and rail, and estimated annual average NOx emissions from traffic. The final multivariable linear regression model explained 62% of the spatial variation in ambient UFP concentrations whereas the KRLS model explained 79% of the variance. The KRLS model performed slightly better than the linear regression model when evaluated using an external dataset (R(2)=0.58 vs. 0.55) or a cross-validation procedure (R(2)=0.67 vs. 0.60). In general, our findings suggest that the KRLS approach may offer modest improvements in predictive performance compared to standard multivariable linear regression models used to estimate spatial variations in ambient UFPs. However, differences in predictive performance were not statistically significant when evaluated using the cross-validation procedure. Crown
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Built environment; Land use regression; Traffic; Ultrafine particles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26720396     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  15 in total

1.  Mapping urban air quality using mobile sampling with low-cost sensors and machine learning in Seoul, South Korea.

Authors:  Chris C Lim; Ho Kim; M J Ruzmyn Vilcassim; George D Thurston; Terry Gordon; Lung-Chi Chen; Kiyoung Lee; Michael Heimbinder; Sun-Young Kim
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Aviation Emissions Impact Ambient Ultrafine Particle Concentrations in the Greater Boston Area.

Authors:  N Hudda; M C Simon; W Zamore; D Brugge; J L Durant
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Development of machine learning models for mortality risk prediction after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Yunlong Fan; Junfeng Dong; Yuanbin Wu; Ming Shen; Siming Zhu; Xiaoyi He; Shengli Jiang; Jiakang Shao; Chao Song
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-02

4.  Characterization of Annual Average Traffic-Related Air Pollution Concentrations in the Greater Seattle Area from a Year-Long Mobile Monitoring Campaign.

Authors:  Magali N Blanco; Amanda Gassett; Timothy Gould; Annie Doubleday; David L Slager; Elena Austin; Edmund Seto; Timothy V Larson; Julian D Marshall; Lianne Sheppard
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 11.357

5.  A Comparison of a Machine Learning Model with EuroSCORE II in Predicting Mortality after Elective Cardiac Surgery: A Decision Curve Analysis.

Authors:  Jérôme Allyn; Nicolas Allou; Pascal Augustin; Ivan Philip; Olivier Martinet; Myriem Belghiti; Sophie Provenchere; Philippe Montravers; Cyril Ferdynus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Land Use Regression Models for Ultrafine Particles in Six European Areas.

Authors:  Erik van Nunen; Roel Vermeulen; Ming-Yi Tsai; Nicole Probst-Hensch; Alex Ineichen; Mark Davey; Medea Imboden; Regina Ducret-Stich; Alessio Naccarati; Daniela Raffaele; Andrea Ranzi; Cristiana Ivaldi; Claudia Galassi; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Ariadna Curto; David Donaire-Gonzalez; Marta Cirach; Leda Chatzi; Mariza Kampouri; Jelle Vlaanderen; Kees Meliefste; Daan Buijtenhuijs; Bert Brunekreef; David Morley; Paolo Vineis; John Gulliver; Gerard Hoek
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Aviation-Related Impacts on Ultrafine Particle Number Concentrations Outside and Inside Residences near an Airport.

Authors:  N Hudda; M C Simon; W Zamore; J L Durant
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 8.  Methods for Assessing Long-Term Exposures to Outdoor Air Pollutants.

Authors:  Gerard Hoek
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-12

9.  PM2.5 Concentration Estimation Based on Image Processing Schemes and Simple Linear Regression.

Authors:  Jiun-Jian Liaw; Yung-Fa Huang; Cheng-Hsiung Hsieh; Dung-Ching Lin; Chin-Hsiang Luo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Within-city Spatial Variations in Ambient Ultrafine Particle Concentrations and Incident Brain Tumors in Adults.

Authors:  Scott Weichenthal; Toyib Olaniyan; Tanya Christidis; Eric Lavigne; Marianne Hatzopoulou; Keith Van Ryswyk; Michael Tjepkema; Rick Burnett
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.