Literature DB >> 26720277

The same type of visual working memory limitations in humans and monkeys.

Deepna T Devkar, Anthony A Wright, Wei Ji Ma.   

Abstract

Rhesus monkeys are widely used as an animal model for human memory, including visual working memory (VWM). It is, however, unknown whether the same principles govern VWM in humans and rhesus monkeys. Here, we tested both species in nearly identical change-localization paradigms and formally compared the same set of models of VWM limitations. These models include the classic item-limit model and recent noise-based (resource) models, as well as hybrid models that combine a noise-based representation with an item limit. By varying the magnitude of the change in addition to the typical set size manipulation, we were able to show large differences in goodness of fit among the five models tested. In spite of quantitative performance differences between the species, we find that the variable-precision model--a noise-based model--best describes the behavior of both species. Adding an item limit to this model does not help to account for the data. Our results suggest evolutionary continuity of VWM across primates and help establish the rhesus monkey as a model system for studying the neural substrates of multiple-item VWM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26720277      PMCID: PMC5079709          DOI: 10.1167/15.16.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  36 in total

1.  Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Hongsup Shin; Wen-Chuang Chou; Ryan George; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Modulation of neuronal activity in superior colliculus by changes in target probability.

Authors:  M A Basso; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Neuron activity related to short-term memory.

Authors:  J M Fuster; G E Alexander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A probabilistic model of visual working memory: Incorporating higher order regularities into working memory capacity estimates.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  "Plateau"-related summary statistics are uninformative for comparing working memory models.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Probabilistic computation in human perception under variability in encoding precision.

Authors:  Shaiyan Keshvari; Ronald van den Berg; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Executive control processes underlying multi-item working memory.

Authors:  Antonio H Lara; Jonathan D Wallis
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  4 in total

1.  Dissociations of the number and precision of visual short-term memory representations in change detection.

Authors:  Weizhen Xie; Weiwei Zhang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

2.  Variable precision in visual perception.

Authors:  Shan Shen; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Monkeys and humans take local uncertainty into account when localizing a change.

Authors:  Deepna Devkar; Anthony A Wright; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  A resource-rational theory of set size effects in human visual working memory.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 8.140

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.