Literature DB >> 26719078

Severe sepsis and septic shock in pre-hospital emergency medicine: survey results of medical directors of emergency medical services concerning antibiotics, blood cultures and algorithms.

Sebastian Casu1, David Häske2.   

Abstract

Delayed antibiotic treatment for patients in severe sepsis and septic shock decreases the probability of survival. In this survey, medical directors of different emergency medical services (EMS) in Germany were asked if they are prepared for pre-hospital sepsis therapy with antibiotics or special algorithms to evaluate the individual preparations of the different rescue areas for the treatment of patients with this infectious disease. The objective of the survey was to obtain a general picture of the current status of the EMS with respect to rapid antibiotic treatment for sepsis. A total of 166 medical directors were invited to complete a short survey on behalf of the different rescue service districts in Germany via an electronic cover letter. Of the rescue districts, 25.6 % (n = 20) stated that they keep antibiotics on EMS vehicles. In addition, 2.6 % carry blood cultures on the vehicles. The most common antibiotic is ceftriaxone (third generation cephalosporin). In total, 8 (10.3 %) rescue districts use an algorithm for patients with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock. Although the German EMS is an emergency physician-based rescue system, special opportunities in the form of antibiotics on emergency physician vehicles are missing. Simultaneously, only 10.3 % of the rescue districts use a special algorithm for sepsis therapy. Sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock do not appear to be prioritized as highly as these deadly diseases should be in the pre-hospital setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algorithm; Antibiotics; Emergency medical services; Emergency treatment; Infection; Sepsis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26719078     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-015-1371-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  28 in total

1.  How Do Emergency Medicine Residency Programs Structure Their Clinical Competency Committees? A Survey.

Authors:  Christopher I Doty; Lynn P Roppolo; Shellie Asher; Jason P Seamon; Rahul Bhat; Stephanie Taft; Autumn Graham; James Willis
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  [The current standing of obstetrical analgesia and anesthesia. A survey of North Rhein-Westfalia].

Authors:  T Meuser; S Grond; J Lynch; M F Irnich; K A Lehmann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Comparison of Early Goal-Directed Therapy With Usual Care for Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.

Authors:  Michael Gottlieb; John Bailitz
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  Is there a benefit for a care protocol in the treatment of septic shock?

Authors:  Ilaria Emanuela Bossi; Anna Maria Rusconi; Geoff Lampard; Michael Szava-Kovats
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Lower versus higher hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in septic shock.

Authors:  Lars B Holst; Nicolai Haase; Jørn Wetterslev; Jan Wernerman; Anne B Guttormsen; Sari Karlsson; Pär I Johansson; Anders Aneman; Marianne L Vang; Robert Winding; Lars Nebrich; Helle L Nibro; Bodil S Rasmussen; Johnny R M Lauridsen; Jane S Nielsen; Anders Oldner; Ville Pettilä; Maria B Cronhjort; Lasse H Andersen; Ulf G Pedersen; Nanna Reiter; Jørgen Wiis; Jonathan O White; Lene Russell; Klaus J Thornberg; Peter B Hjortrup; Rasmus G Müller; Morten H Møller; Morten Steensen; Inga Tjäder; Kristina Kilsand; Suzanne Odeberg-Wernerman; Brit Sjøbø; Helle Bundgaard; Maria A Thyø; David Lodahl; Rikke Mærkedahl; Carsten Albeck; Dorte Illum; Mary Kruse; Per Winkel; Anders Perner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  EMS patients and walk-in patients presenting with severe sepsis: differences in management and outcome.

Authors:  Jon Femling; Steven Weiss; Eric Hauswald; David Tarby
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.954

7.  Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis.

Authors:  Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen; Michael Bailey; David Pilcher; D Jamie Cooper; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prehospital Sepsis Project (PSP): knowledge and attitudes of United States advanced out-of-hospital care providers.

Authors:  Amado Alejandro Báez; Priscilla Hanudel; Maria Teresa Perez; Ediza M Giraldez; Susan R Wilcox
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.040

9.  Impact of time to antibiotics on survival in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in whom early goal-directed therapy was initiated in the emergency department.

Authors:  David F Gaieski; Mark E Mikkelsen; Roger A Band; Jesse M Pines; Richard Massone; Frances F Furia; Frances S Shofer; Munish Goyal
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 10.  Suspicion and treatment of severe sepsis. An overview of the prehospital chain of care.

Authors:  Johan Herlitz; Angela Bång; Birgitta Wireklint-Sundström; Christer Axelsson; Anders Bremer; Magnus Hagiwara; Anders Jonsson; Lars Lundberg; Björn-Ove Suserud; Lars Ljungström
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  2 in total

1.  Epidemiology of septic shock in prehospital medical services in five Colombian cities.

Authors:  Diana Carolina López-Medina; Marcela Henao-Perez; Jaime Arenas-Andrade; Emel David Hinestroza-Marín; Fabián Alberto Jaimes-Barragán; Oscar Iván Quirós-Gómez
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2020-05-08

Review 2.  [Sepsis in out-of-hospital emergency medicine].

Authors:  Manuel Obermaier; Markus A Weigand; Erik Popp; Florian Uhle
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 0.892

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.