Franc Llorens1, Matthias Schmitz2, André Karch3, Maria Cramm4, Peter Lange2, Kerim Gherib2, Daniela Varges2, Christian Schmidt2, Inga Zerr4, Katharina Stoeck2. 1. Clinical Dementia Center, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Göttingen, Germany. Electronic address: franc.llorens@gmail.com. 2. Clinical Dementia Center, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany. 4. Clinical Dementia Center, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Göttingen, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The analysis of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers gains importance in clinical routine and is effective in substantiating dementia diagnosis in the differential diagnostic context. METHODS: We evaluated the levels of β-amyloid (Aβ) 42, Aβ40, tau, and P-tau in a large patient population subdivided into prion diseases, tauopathies, synucleinopathies, and controls. Diagnostic test evaluation was assessed by ROC area under the curve analysis. RESULTS: High tau levels were detected in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) and high P-tau levels in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and sCJD. Aβ40 was lower exclusively in prionopathies, but low Aβ42 was detected in AD, sCJD, and Lewy body dementia. When disease groups were stratified according to the underlying proteinopathy, we detected disease-type specificities for all biomarkers. P-tau/tau, Aβ42/40, Aβ42/tau, and Aβ40/tau ratios proved valuable in discriminating disease groups and controls, especially P-tau/tau ratio in the identification of sCJD cases. DISCUSSION: Combining the biomarker panel allows differentiating between various types of neurodegenerative dementias and contributes to a better understanding of their pathophysiological processes.
INTRODUCTION: The analysis of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers gains importance in clinical routine and is effective in substantiating dementia diagnosis in the differential diagnostic context. METHODS: We evaluated the levels of β-amyloid (Aβ) 42, Aβ40, tau, and P-tau in a large patient population subdivided into prion diseases, tauopathies, synucleinopathies, and controls. Diagnostic test evaluation was assessed by ROC area under the curve analysis. RESULTS: High tau levels were detected in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) and high P-tau levels in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and sCJD. Aβ40 was lower exclusively in prionopathies, but low Aβ42 was detected in AD, sCJD, and Lewy body dementia. When disease groups were stratified according to the underlying proteinopathy, we detected disease-type specificities for all biomarkers. P-tau/tau, Aβ42/40, Aβ42/tau, and Aβ40/tau ratios proved valuable in discriminating disease groups and controls, especially P-tau/tau ratio in the identification of sCJD cases. DISCUSSION: Combining the biomarker panel allows differentiating between various types of neurodegenerative dementias and contributes to a better understanding of their pathophysiological processes.
Authors: Anna Villar-Piqué; Matthias Schmitz; Ingolf Lachmann; André Karch; Olga Calero; Christiane Stehmann; Shannon Sarros; Anna Ladogana; Anna Poleggi; Isabel Santana; Isidre Ferrer; Eva Mitrova; Dana Žáková; Maurizio Pocchiari; Inês Baldeiras; Miguel Calero; Steven J Collins; Michael D Geschwind; Raquel Sánchez-Valle; Inga Zerr; Franc Llorens Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: M J Leitão; I Baldeiras; M R Almeida; M H Ribeiro; A C Santos; M Ribeiro; J Tomás; S Rocha; I Santana; C R Oliveira Journal: J Neurol Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Franc Llorens; Tomás Barrio; Ângela Correia; Anna Villar-Piqué; Katrin Thüne; Peter Lange; Juan José Badiola; Matthias Schmitz; Ingolf Lachmann; Rosa Bolea; Inga Zerr Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Agata Mata; Laura Urrea; Silvia Vilches; Franc Llorens; Katrin Thüne; Juan-Carlos Espinosa; Olivier Andréoletti; Alejandro M Sevillano; Juan María Torres; Jesús Rodríguez Requena; Inga Zerr; Isidro Ferrer; Rosalina Gavín; José Antonio Del Río Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Bryce K Chang; Gregory S Day; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Andrew McKeon; Eoin P Flanagan; Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich; Michelle M Mielke; Aivi Nguyen; David T Jones; Michel Toledano; Walter K Kremers; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Wentao Li Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Silvia Koscova; Dana Zakova Slivarichova; Ivana Tomeckova; Katarina Melicherova; Martin Stelzer; Alzbeta Janakova; Dana Kosorinova; Girma Belay; Eva Mitrova Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2016-09-24 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Peter Hermann; Brian Appleby; Jean-Philippe Brandel; Byron Caughey; Steven Collins; Michael D Geschwind; Alison Green; Stephane Haïk; Gabor G Kovacs; Anna Ladogana; Franc Llorens; Simon Mead; Noriyuki Nishida; Suvankar Pal; Piero Parchi; Maurizio Pocchiari; Katsuya Satoh; Gianluigi Zanusso; Inga Zerr Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 44.182