BACKGROUND:Mexican immigrants are disproportionally affected by diet-related risk of metabolic dysfunction. Whether adhering to a traditional Mexican diet or adopting a US diet contributes to metabolic changes associated with future risk of type 2 diabetes and other chronic diseases has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test in a randomized crossover feeding trial the metabolic responses to a Mexican diet compared with a commonly consumed US diet. DESIGN:First- and second-generation healthy women of Mexican descent (n = 53) were randomly assigned in a crossover design to consume a Mexican or US diet for 24 d each, separated by a 28-d washout period. Diets were eucaloric and similar in macronutrient composition. The metabolic responses to diets were assessed by measuring fasting serum concentrations of glucose, insulin, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), adiponectin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin 6 (IL-6), as well as the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) at the beginning and end of each period. Linear mixed models tested the intervention effect on the biomarkers, while adjusting for diet sequence, feeding period, baseline and washout biomarker concentrations, age, acculturation, and BMI. RESULTS: Compared with the US diet, the Mexican diet reduced insulin by 14% [geometric means (95% CIs): 9.3 (8.3, 10.3) compared with 8.0 (7.2, 8.9) μU/mL; P = 0.02], HOMA-IR by 15% [2.0 (1.8, 2.3) compared with 1.7 (1.6, 2.0); P = 0.02], and IGFBP-3 by 6% (mean ± SEM: 2420 ± 29 compared with 2299 ± 29 ng/mL; P < 0.01) and tended to reduce circulating concentrations of IGF-1 by 4% (149 ± 2.6 compared with 144 ± 2.5 ng/mL; P = 0.06). There was no significant intervention effect on serum concentrations of glucose, adiponectin, CRP, or IL-6 in the US compared with the Mexican diet. CONCLUSION: Compared with the commonly consumed US diet, the traditional Mexican diet modestly improved insulin sensitivity under conditions of weight stability in healthy women of Mexican descent, while having no impact on biomarkers of inflammation. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01369173.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Mexican immigrants are disproportionally affected by diet-related risk of metabolic dysfunction. Whether adhering to a traditional Mexican diet or adopting a US diet contributes to metabolic changes associated with future risk of type 2 diabetes and other chronic diseases has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test in a randomized crossover feeding trial the metabolic responses to a Mexican diet compared with a commonly consumed US diet. DESIGN: First- and second-generation healthy women of Mexican descent (n = 53) were randomly assigned in a crossover design to consume a Mexican or US diet for 24 d each, separated by a 28-d washout period. Diets were eucaloric and similar in macronutrient composition. The metabolic responses to diets were assessed by measuring fasting serum concentrations of glucose, insulin, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), adiponectin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin 6 (IL-6), as well as the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) at the beginning and end of each period. Linear mixed models tested the intervention effect on the biomarkers, while adjusting for diet sequence, feeding period, baseline and washout biomarker concentrations, age, acculturation, and BMI. RESULTS: Compared with the US diet, the Mexican diet reduced insulin by 14% [geometric means (95% CIs): 9.3 (8.3, 10.3) compared with 8.0 (7.2, 8.9) μU/mL; P = 0.02], HOMA-IR by 15% [2.0 (1.8, 2.3) compared with 1.7 (1.6, 2.0); P = 0.02], and IGFBP-3 by 6% (mean ± SEM: 2420 ± 29 compared with 2299 ± 29 ng/mL; P < 0.01) and tended to reduce circulating concentrations of IGF-1 by 4% (149 ± 2.6 compared with 144 ± 2.5 ng/mL; P = 0.06). There was no significant intervention effect on serum concentrations of glucose, adiponectin, CRP, or IL-6 in the US compared with the Mexican diet. CONCLUSION: Compared with the commonly consumed US diet, the traditional Mexican diet modestly improved insulin sensitivity under conditions of weight stability in healthy women of Mexican descent, while having no impact on biomarkers of inflammation. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01369173.
Authors: Juan A Rivera; Simón Barquera; Fabricio Campirano; Ismael Campos; Margarita Safdie; Víctor Tovar Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Esther Lopez-Garcia; Matthias B Schulze; Teresa T Fung; James B Meigs; Nader Rifai; JoAnn E Manson; Frank B Hu Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Jeannette M Beasley; Nicole M Wedick; Swapnil N Rajpathak; Xiaonan Xue; Michelle D Holmes; Marc J Gunter; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Thomas E Rohan; Michael Pollak; Robert C Kaplan; Frank B Hu; Qi Sun; Howard D Strickler Journal: Growth Horm IGF Res Date: 2014-05-17 Impact factor: 2.372
Authors: Mayra Arias-Gastélum; Nangel M Lindberg; Michael C Leo; Meg Bruening; Corrie M Whisner; Cheryl Der Ananian; Steven P Hooker; Erin S LeBlanc; Victor J Stevens; Elizabeth Shuster; Richard T Meenan; Sara Gille; Katherine A Vaughn; Ann Turner; Sonia Vega-López Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2020-06-03
Authors: S M Martinez; E Blanco; J M Tschann; N F Butte; M A Grandner; L A Pasch Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 8.915
Authors: Melissa C Kay; Emily W Duffy; Lisa J Harnack; Andrea S Anater; Joel C Hampton; Alison L Eldridge; Mary Story Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-06-05 Impact factor: 6.706
Authors: Lorena Garcia; Anne Lee; Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri; John M Neuhaus; Sally Moyce; Allison Aiello; Tali Elfassy; Mary N Haan Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 2.692