| Literature DB >> 26718190 |
Abstract
This study examined subject-object asymmetry and developmental sequence in the second language (L2) acquisition of three types of wh-extraction, i.e., English headed relatives, headless relatives, and embedded wh-questions. Sixty-four L1 Korean learners of English completed an elicited imitation task and a grammaticality judgment task. The learners demonstrated a subject advantage in the headed RCs and headless RCs, but an object advantage in the embedded wh-questions, which suggests that they treat embedded wh-questions differently from headed relatives and headless relatives despite the similarities in surface forms. The learners further demonstrated the order of developing headless RCs followed by embedded wh-questions, and subsequently headed RCs, which supports the primacy of headless relatives as a simple nominal in L2 development.Keywords: Elicited imitation; Embedded wh-questions; English as a second language; English relative clauses; Korean speakers
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26718190 DOI: 10.1007/s10936-015-9410-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Psycholinguist Res ISSN: 0090-6905