Literature DB >> 26717119

Evaluating Structural Equation Models for Categorical Outcomes: A New Test Statistic and a Practical Challenge of Interpretation.

Scott Monroe1, Li Cai2.   

Abstract

This research is concerned with two topics in assessing model fit for categorical data analysis. The first topic involves the application of a limited-information overall test, introduced in the item response theory literature, to structural equation modeling (SEM) of categorical outcome variables. Most popular SEM test statistics assess how well the model reproduces estimated polychoric correlations. In contrast, limited-information test statistics assess how well the underlying categorical data are reproduced. Here, the recently introduced C2 statistic of Cai and Monroe (2014) is applied. The second topic concerns how the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) fit index can be affected by the number of categories in the outcome variable. This relationship creates challenges for interpreting RMSEA. While the two topics initially appear unrelated, they may conveniently be studied in tandem since RMSEA is based on an overall test statistic, such as C2. The results are illustrated with an empirical application to data from a large-scale educational survey.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RMSEA; limited-information testing; ordinal data; structural equation modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26717119      PMCID: PMC4697283          DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1032398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  7 in total

1.  A goodness of fit test for sparse 2p contingency tables.

Authors:  David J Bartholomew; Shing On Leung
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the "problem" of sample size: a clarification.

Authors:  R Cudeck; S J Henly
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of hierarchical item factor models.

Authors:  Li Cai; Mark Hansen
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Assessing Approximate Fit in Categorical Data Analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Maydeu-Olivares; Harry Joe
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Analysis of covariance structures.

Authors:  R D Bock; R E Bargmann
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables.

Authors:  S Y Lee; W Y Poon; P M Bentler
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.

Authors:  M W Browne
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.380

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Incremental Model Fit Assessment in the Case of Categorical Data: Tucker-Lewis Index for Item Response Theory Modeling.

Authors:  Li Cai; Seung Won Chung; Taehun Lee
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2021-05-10

2.  Psychometric properties of the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ) among a sample of overweight/obese French-speaking adolescents.

Authors:  Christophe Maïano; Annie Aimé; Geneviève Lepage; Alexandre J S Morin
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  The Michigan Vision-Related Anxiety Questionnaire: A Psychosocial Outcomes Measure for Inherited Retinal Degenerations.

Authors:  Gabrielle D Lacy; Maria Fernanda Abalem; Chris A Andrews; Rebhi Abuzaitoun; Lilia T Popova; Erin P Santos; Gina Yu; Hanan Y Rakine; Natasha Baig; Joshua R Ehrlich; Abigail T Fahim; Kari H Branham; Bonnielin K Swenor; Paul R Lichter; Gislin Dagnelie; Joan A Stelmack; David C Musch; K Thiran Jayasundera
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  The Status of Pro-social Tendency of Left-Behind Adolescents in China: How Family Function and Self-Esteem Affect Pro-social Tendencies.

Authors:  Feifei Gao; Yuan Yao; Chengwen Yao; Yan Xiong; Honglin Ma; Hongbo Liu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-05-28

5.  Improving the measurement of alexithymia in autistic adults: a psychometric investigation of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale and generation of a general alexithymia factor score using item response theory.

Authors:  Zachary J Williams; Katherine O Gotham
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 7.509

6.  Spanish Translation and Validation of the COVID Stress Scales in Peru.

Authors:  Martin Noe-Grijalva; Anali Polo-Ambrocio; Karla Gómez-Bedia; Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-28

7.  Development of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Worker Well-Being Questionnaire.

Authors:  Ramya Chari; Steven L Sauter; Elizabeth L Petrun Sayers; Wenjing Huang; Gwenith G Fisher; Chia-Chia Chang
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.306

8.  Measuring Depression in Autistic Adults: Psychometric Validation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II.

Authors:  Zachary J Williams; Jonas Everaert; Katherine O Gotham
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2020-08-29

9.  The Michigan Retinal Degeneration Questionnaire: A Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Inherited Retinal Degenerations.

Authors:  Gabrielle D Lacy; Maria Fernanda Abalem; Chris A Andrews; Lilia T Popova; Erin P Santos; Gina Yu; Hanan Y Rakine; Natasha Baig; Joshua R Ehrlich; Abigail T Fahim; Kari H Branham; Joan A Stelmack; Bonnielin K Swenor; Gislin Dagnelie; David C Musch; K Thiran Jayasundera
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Psychometric validation and refinement of the Interoception Sensory Questionnaire (ISQ) in adolescents and adults on the autism spectrum.

Authors:  Evan Suzman; Zachary J Williams; Jacob I Feldman; Michelle Failla; Carissa J Cascio; Mark T Wallace; Maria Niarchou; James S Sutcliffe; Ericka Wodka; Tiffany G Woynaroski
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 6.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.