Literature DB >> 26716693

Successful Recovery of Nuclear Protein-Coding Genes from Small Insects in Museums Using Illumina Sequencing.

Kojun Kanda1, James M Pflug1, John S Sproul1, Mark A Dasenko2, David R Maddison1.   

Abstract

In this paper we explore high-throughput Illumina sequencing of nuclear protein-coding, ribosomal, and mitochondrial genes in small, dried insects stored in natural history collections. We sequenced one tenebrionid beetle and 12 carabid beetles ranging in size from 3.7 to 9.7 mm in length that have been stored in various museums for 4 to 84 years. Although we chose a number of old, small specimens for which we expected low sequence recovery, we successfully recovered at least some low-copy nuclear protein-coding genes from all specimens. For example, in one 56-year-old beetle, 4.4 mm in length, our de novo assembly recovered about 63% of approximately 41,900 nucleotides in a target suite of 67 nuclear protein-coding gene fragments, and 70% using a reference-based assembly. Even in the least successfully sequenced carabid specimen, reference-based assembly yielded fragments that were at least 50% of the target length for 34 of 67 nuclear protein-coding gene fragments. Exploration of alternative references for reference-based assembly revealed few signs of bias created by the reference. For all specimens we recovered almost complete copies of ribosomal and mitochondrial genes. We verified the general accuracy of the sequences through comparisons with sequences obtained from PCR and Sanger sequencing, including of conspecific, fresh specimens, and through phylogenetic analysis that tested the placement of sequences in predicted regions. A few possible inaccuracies in the sequences were detected, but these rarely affected the phylogenetic placement of the samples. Although our sample sizes are low, an exploratory regression study suggests that the dominant factor in predicting success at recovering nuclear protein-coding genes is a high number of Illumina reads, with success at PCR of COI and killing by immersion in ethanol being secondary factors; in analyses of only high-read samples, the primary significant explanatory variable was body length, with small beetles being more successfully sequenced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26716693      PMCID: PMC4696846          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  68 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Alina Cywinska; Shelley L Ball; Jeremy R deWaard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Stéphane Guindon; Olivier Gascuel
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 4.  Genetic analyses from ancient DNA.

Authors:  Svante Pääbo; Hendrik Poinar; David Serre; Viviane Jaenicke-Despres; Juliane Hebler; Nadin Rohland; Melanie Kuch; Johannes Krause; Linda Vigilant; Michael Hofreiter
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Daniel H Janzen; John M Burns; Winnie Hallwachs; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Assessing ancient DNA studies.

Authors:  M Thomas P Gilbert; Hans-Jürgen Bandelt; Michael Hofreiter; Ian Barnes
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis.

Authors:  Catherine H Graham; Simon Ferrier; Falk Huettman; Craig Moritz; A Townsend Peterson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Genis Parra; Keith Bradnam; Ian Korf
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment.

Authors:  Kazutaka Katoh; Kei-ichi Kuma; Hiroyuki Toh; Takashi Miyata
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  DNA extraction from dry museum beetles without conferring external morphological damage.

Authors:  M Thomas P Gilbert; Wendy Moore; Linea Melchior; Michael Worobey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  12 in total

1.  Phylogeny of the supertribe Nebriitae (Coleoptera, Carabidae) based on analyses of DNA sequence data.

Authors:  David H Kavanaugh; David R Maddison; W Brian Simison; Sean D Schoville; Joachim Schmidt; Arnaud Faille; Wendy Moore; James M Pflug; Sophie L Archambeault; Tinya Hoang; Jei-Ying Chen
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 1.546

2.  A preliminary phylogeny and review of the genus Tasmanitachoides, with descriptions of two new species (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Bembidarenini).

Authors:  David R Maddison; Nick Porch
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 1.546

3.  Correction: Successful Recovery of Nuclear Protein-Coding Genes from Small Insects in Museums Using Illumina Sequencing.

Authors: 
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Phylogenetic placement of the Pacific Northwest subterranean endemic diving beetle Stygoporus oregonensis Larson & LaBonte (Dytiscidae, Hydroporinae).

Authors:  Kojun Kanda; R Antonio Gomez; Richard Van Driesche; Kelly B Miller; David R Maddison
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 1.546

5.  Genome skimming herbarium specimens for DNA barcoding and phylogenomics.

Authors:  Chun-Xia Zeng; Peter M Hollingsworth; Jing Yang; Zheng-Shan He; Zhi-Rong Zhang; De-Zhu Li; Jun-Bo Yang
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.993

6.  Genome skimming is a low-cost and robust strategy to assemble complete mitochondrial genomes from ethanol preserved specimens in biodiversity studies.

Authors:  Bruna Trevisan; Daniel M C Alcantara; Denis Jacob Machado; Fernando P L Marques; Daniel J G Lahr
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Ultraconserved element (UCE) probe set design: Base genome and initial design parameters critical for optimization.

Authors:  Grey T Gustafson; Alana Alexander; John S Sproul; James M Pflug; David R Maddison; Andrew E Z Short
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Ultraconserved elements (UCEs) resolve the phylogeny of Australasian smurf-weevils.

Authors:  Matthew H Van Dam; Athena W Lam; Katayo Sagata; Bradley Gewa; Raymond Laufa; Michael Balke; Brant C Faircloth; Alexander Riedel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reinstatement of Eschatoporiini Blaisdell, 1906, a unique tribe of blind cavernicolous Tenebrionidae from California, with a new species from Napa County (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Lagriinae).

Authors:  Rolf L Aalbu; Kojun Kanda; Aaron D Smith
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 1.546

10.  New Light on Historical Specimens Reveals a New Species of Ladybird (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): Morphological, Museomic, and Phylogenetic Analyses.

Authors:  Karen Salazar; Romain Nattier
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.769

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.