Literature DB >> 23937689

The selective role of premotor cortex in speech perception: a contribution to phoneme judgements but not speech comprehension.

Katya Krieger-Redwood1, M Gareth Gaskell, Shane Lindsay, Elizabeth Jefferies.   

Abstract

Several accounts of speech perception propose that the areas involved in producing language are also involved in perceiving it. In line with this view, neuroimaging studies show activation of premotor cortex (PMC) during phoneme judgment tasks; however, there is debate about whether speech perception necessarily involves motor processes, across all task contexts, or whether the contribution of PMC is restricted to tasks requiring explicit phoneme awareness. Some aspects of speech processing, such as mapping sounds onto meaning, may proceed without the involvement of motor speech areas if PMC specifically contributes to the manipulation and categorical perception of phonemes. We applied TMS to three sites-PMC, posterior superior temporal gyrus, and occipital pole-and for the first time within the TMS literature, directly contrasted two speech perception tasks that required explicit phoneme decisions and mapping of speech sounds onto semantic categories, respectively. TMS to PMC disrupted explicit phonological judgments but not access to meaning for the same speech stimuli. TMS to two further sites confirmed that this pattern was site specific and did not reflect a generic difference in the susceptibility of our experimental tasks to TMS: stimulation of pSTG, a site involved in auditory processing, disrupted performance in both language tasks, whereas stimulation of occipital pole had no effect on performance in either task. These findings demonstrate that, although PMC is important for explicit phonological judgments, crucially, PMC is not necessary for mapping speech onto meanings.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23937689     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  20 in total

1.  No evidence of somatotopic place of articulation feature mapping in motor cortex during passive speech perception.

Authors:  Jessica S Arsenault; Bradley R Buchsbaum
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

2.  Neural Representation of Articulable and Inarticulable Novel Sound Contrasts: The Role of the Dorsal Stream.

Authors:  David I Saltzman; Emily B Myers
Journal:  Neurobiol Lang (Camb)       Date:  2020-08

3.  Brain networks engaged in audiovisual integration during speech perception revealed by persistent homology-based network filtration.

Authors:  Heejung Kim; Jarang Hahm; Hyekyoung Lee; Eunjoo Kang; Hyejin Kang; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2015-03-02

4.  Asymmetric connectivity between the anterior temporal lobe and the language network.

Authors:  Robert S Hurley; Borna Bonakdarpour; Xue Wang; M-Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Inferior Frontal Cortex Contributions to the Recognition of Spoken Words and Their Constituent Speech Sounds.

Authors:  Jack C Rogers; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  An interactive model of auditory-motor speech perception.

Authors:  Einat Liebenthal; Riikka Möttönen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Decoding Articulatory Features from fMRI Responses in Dorsal Speech Regions.

Authors:  Joao M Correia; Bernadette M B Jansma; Milene Bonte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Speech-Driven Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields Beyond the Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan H Venezia; Virginia M Richards; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.672

9.  Functional significance of the electrocorticographic auditory responses in the premotor cortex.

Authors:  Kazuyo Tanji; Kaori Sakurada; Hayato Funiu; Kenichiro Matsuda; Takamasa Kayama; Sayuri Ito; Kyoko Suzuki
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Distinct effects of memory retrieval and articulatory preparation when learning and accessing new word forms.

Authors:  Anni Nora; Hanna Renvall; Jeong-Young Kim; Elisabet Service; Riitta Salmelin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.