Literature DB >> 26714316

The Nuclear Matrix Protein Megator Regulates Stem Cell Asymmetric Division through the Mitotic Checkpoint Complex in Drosophila Testes.

Ying Liu1, Shree Ram Singh1, Xiankun Zeng1, Jiangsha Zhao1, Steven X Hou1.   

Abstract

In adult Drosophila testis, asymmetric division of germline stem cells (GSCs) is specified by an oriented spindle and cortically localized adenomatous coli tumor suppressor homolog 2 (Apc2). However, the molecular mechanism underlying these events remains unclear. Here we identified Megator (Mtor), a nuclear matrix protein, which regulates GSC maintenance and asymmetric division through the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) complex. Loss of Mtor function results in Apc2 mis-localization, incorrect centrosome orientation, defective mitotic spindle formation, and abnormal chromosome segregation that lead to the eventual GSC loss. Expression of mitotic arrest-deficient-2 (Mad2) and monopolar spindle 1 (Mps1) of the SAC complex effectively rescued the GSC loss phenotype associated with loss of Mtor function. Collectively our results define a new role of the nuclear matrix-SAC axis in regulating stem cell maintenance and asymmetric division.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26714316      PMCID: PMC4703072          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Genet        ISSN: 1553-7390            Impact factor:   5.917


Introduction

Germline stem cells (GSCs) from the Drosophila testis provide one of the best genetic systems to study stem cell regulation. At the tip of the Drosophila testis (apex) is a germinal proliferation center, which contains the germline and somatic stem cells that maintain spermatogenesis (Fig 1A) [1-5]. Each GSC is encysted by two somatic cyst stem cells (CySCs). Both GSCs and CySCs anchor to a group of 12 nondividing somatic cells, called the “hub”, through cell-adhesion molecules [6-9]. The hub defines the stem-cell niche by expressing the growth factor Unpaired (Upd), the ligand that activates the Janus kinase–signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway in adjacent GSCs and CySCs to regulate their self-renewal [10,11]. In addition, hedgehog (Hh) [12-14], and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) [9,15] signaling also play important role in GSC and CySC maintenance. During GSC division, the mother (old) centrosome remains anchored near the niche, while the daughter centrosome migrates to the opposite side of the cell, thereby assembling a mitotic spindle perpendicular to the hub [16-18]. In addition, the mother centriole nucleates more microtubules than the daughter centriole, which may help in asymmetric delivery of Apc2 to the cortex where GCSs contact the hub [18]. At the cortex, Apc2 and E-cadherin together anchor the spindles of mitotic GSCs perpendicular to the hub [19]. Therefore, only one daughter cell will contact the hub and receive JAK-STAT signaling to maintain stem cell identity, while the daughter cell at the other end of the mitotic spindle will experience a weaker signal and initiate differentiation. However, it is not known what molecular mechanism regulates asymmetric Apc2 localization at the niche-GSC interface.
Fig 1

Mtor regulates GSC maintenance.

(A) A schematic drawing of the asymmetric division of a Drosophila male GSC. Both GSCs (green) and CySCs (blue) are anchored around the hub (orange) through adherens junctions (brown). Asymmetric division of a GSC results in a new GSC (green) and a gonialblast (GB) (light green). In the GSC (green), the mother centrosome (dark blue) nucleates more microtubules (dark blue) than the daughter centrosome (pink), which may help to asymmetrically deliver Apc2 (beige) to the cortex, where GSCs contact the hub. At the cortex, Apc2 concentrates at the cell–cell junction (brown) to anchor the mitotic spindles from the mother centrosome perpendicular to the hub, but the daughter centrosome remains on the opposite side (pink). As a result, GSCs divide asymmetrically. (B) Quantification of the number of GSCs associated with the hub (7 days old flies were dissected and stained for each genotype). Nos-Gal4-driven Mtor RNAi-1 (n = 35), Mtor RNAi-2 (n = 39), or Mtor RNAi-3 (n = 41) caused a significant decrease in the number of GSCs associated with the hub compared to the control Nos-Gal4-driven LacZ RNAi (n = 27). ***p<0.0001. Error bars represent SD. (C-F) GSCs in testes of wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) (C), Nos>Mtor RNAi-1 (D), Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 (E), and Nos>Mtor RNAi-3 flies (F) were examined by staining with anti-vasa [red, marks all germ cells including GSCs in white dotted circle (one depicted in a white arrowhead); yellow dotted circle marks the GB (one depicted in yellow arrow)], anti-Fas3 (green, marks the hub cells, asterisks), anti-1B1 (green in dot and branched marks the spectrosomes and fusomes respectively), and DAPI (blue). Some CySCs positioned adjacent to the hub cells (pink dotted circle) after some GSCs were depleted in Nos>Mtor RNAi testes (D-F). All flies were cultured for 7 days at 29°C before dissection. Scale bars represent 10 μm.

Mtor regulates GSC maintenance.

(A) A schematic drawing of the asymmetric division of a Drosophila male GSC. Both GSCs (green) and CySCs (blue) are anchored around the hub (orange) through adherens junctions (brown). Asymmetric division of a GSC results in a new GSC (green) and a gonialblast (GB) (light green). In the GSC (green), the mother centrosome (dark blue) nucleates more microtubules (dark blue) than the daughter centrosome (pink), which may help to asymmetrically deliver Apc2 (beige) to the cortex, where GSCs contact the hub. At the cortex, Apc2 concentrates at the cell–cell junction (brown) to anchor the mitotic spindles from the mother centrosome perpendicular to the hub, but the daughter centrosome remains on the opposite side (pink). As a result, GSCs divide asymmetrically. (B) Quantification of the number of GSCs associated with the hub (7 days old flies were dissected and stained for each genotype). Nos-Gal4-driven Mtor RNAi-1 (n = 35), Mtor RNAi-2 (n = 39), or Mtor RNAi-3 (n = 41) caused a significant decrease in the number of GSCs associated with the hub compared to the control Nos-Gal4-driven LacZ RNAi (n = 27). ***p<0.0001. Error bars represent SD. (C-F) GSCs in testes of wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) (C), Nos>Mtor RNAi-1 (D), Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 (E), and Nos>Mtor RNAi-3 flies (F) were examined by staining with anti-vasa [red, marks all germ cells including GSCs in white dotted circle (one depicted in a white arrowhead); yellow dotted circle marks the GB (one depicted in yellow arrow)], anti-Fas3 (green, marks the hub cells, asterisks), anti-1B1 (green in dot and branched marks the spectrosomes and fusomes respectively), and DAPI (blue). Some CySCs positioned adjacent to the hub cells (pink dotted circle) after some GSCs were depleted in Nos>Mtor RNAi testes (D-F). All flies were cultured for 7 days at 29°C before dissection. Scale bars represent 10 μm. To identify new regulators of stem cell asymmetric division in the Drosophila testis, we carried out a screen in which a collection of transgenic RNAi lines [20-22] were crossed with act-Gal4; tub-Gal80 flies (referred to as Act ). The adult flies were shifted to the restrictive temperature (29°C-to inhibit Gal80 activity and induce Gal4-activity) from 18°C (Gal80 is active) and cultured at different time intervals. The flies were then dissected, stained, and examined for GSCs phenotype under confocal microscopy. One of the first few genes identified in this screen was Mtor. Mtor knockdown by transgenic RNAi resulted in a significant decrease of GSCs in the testes compared to the wild-type flies. Mtor belongs to a conserved family of coiled-coil proteins [translocated promoter region (Tpr) in vertebrates and myosin-like proteins 1 and 2 (Mlp1/2) in yeast] [23-25] that make up nuclear basket of the nuclear pore complex in vertebrates [26-29], and nuclear matrix in flies [27]. Tpr/Mtor plays an important role in regulating the SAC. The SAC delays anaphase until chromosomes are bioriented on the mitotic spindle. Recent studies demonstrated that Tpr/Mtor regulates the SAC by either controlling the kinetochore localization of Mad1 and Mad2 [26–27, 29–30] or by targeting Mad1 to the nuclear pore to direct mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) assembly during interphase [28]. In this study, we found that loss of Mtor function affects GSC maintenance and asymmetric division. Knockdown Mtor results in Apc2 mis-localization, defects of mitotic spindle formation and chromosome segregation, and eventual GSC loss. Expression of Mad2 and Mps1 of the SAC complex effectively rescued the GSC loss phenotype associated with loss of Mtor function. Our results suggest that a nuclear matrix-SAC axis regulates GSC maintenance and asymmetric division through the Mtor-Mps1/Mad2 pathway.

Results

Mtor is required in both GSCs and CySCs

As described above, we identified Mtor in a genetic screen for new regulators of stem cell fates in the Drosophila testis. Mtor knockdown by transgenic RNAi resulted in a significant decrease of GSCs in the testes compared to the wild-type testes. To further understand the function of Mtor in the germline or in the soma, we knocked down Mtor by using cell-type–specific Gal4s. We used three independently generated UAS-Mtor RNAi transgenic fly lines. We found that depleting Mtor in the germ cell lineage using Nanos (Nos)-Gal4 resulted in a significant decrease in the number of GSCs associated with the hub compared to the wild-type control (Figs 1B–1F and S3A and S3B). We also knocked down Mtor in the CySC lineage using the c587-Gal4 driver in combination with a temperature-sensitive Gal80 inhibitor [31]. Depleting Mtor in the CySC lineage (c587 >Mtor RNAi) caused defects in GSC differentiation (S1B and S1F and S1H Fig) similar to those seen in cyst cells defective in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway [32–36; S1C and S1D Fig]. We further examined CySC changes in c587 >Mtor RNAi flies using Traffic Jam (Tj) (a transcription factor expressed in CySCs, early cyst cells, and the hub cells) and Eyes absent (Eya) (a transcription factor expressed in early cyst cells) markers (S1E–S1H Fig). In comparison with those in the wild-type testes, the Tj-positive (S1 Fig, compare S1E and S1F Fig) and Eya-positive cells (S1 Fig, compare S1G and S1H Fig) were pushed away from the niche by the expanding undifferentiated germ cells in the testes of c587 >Mtor RNAi flies, suggesting that the Mtor-deficient CySCs have disadvantage in niche occupancy. We further knocked down Mtor in the hub cells using unpaired (upd)-Gal4 (S2B Fig), in adult fly posterior midgut intestinal stem cells (ISCs) and progenitors using escargot (esg)-Gal4 in combination with a temperature-sensitive Gal80 inhibitor [31] (esg ts >Mtor RNAi) (S2D Fig), and in nine other types of cells using the cell-type–specific Gal4s (S2E Fig). Knockdowns of Mtor in the hub cells, ISCs and progenitors, and eight other cell types [lymph gland (plasmatocytes and crystal cells, collagen (Cg)-Gal4) [37], Drosophila insulin like peptide 2 (Dilp2)-Gal4 [38], leading edge (LE-Gal4) [39], fat body (pumpless (ppl)-Gal4) [40], hindgut (brachyenteron (byn)-Gal4) [41], hemocytes (serpent (srp )-Gal4) [42], corpus allatum (Aug21-Gal4) [43], and hemocytes (hemolectin (hml)-Gal4) [44]], have no obvious phenotypes compared to those cells in the wild-type flies. Only Knockdowns of Mtor using wing-specific (MS1096)-Gal4 [45] ( ms1096>Mtor RNAi-2) resulted in wing phenotype (S2E Fig). Further, we found that knock down of Mtor in adult ISCs has no effect on spindle orientation and chromosome segregation (S6E and S6F Fig). These data suggest that Mtor functions specifically in GSC of Drosophila. Using antibodies to Mtor [46], we detected Mtor in both the germline and soma in the wild-type (S3C Fig), but not in the Mtor-depleted testis (Act ts >Mtor RNAi) (S3D Fig), suggesting that the RNAi almost completely depleted Mtor protein expression. Further, we found that Mtor expresses at the nuclear pores, which is confirmed by co-staining the Mtor with nucleoporin 98 (NUP98) [32] (S3E and S3F Fig).

Mtor cell-autonomously regulates maintenance of GSCs

To further examine the function of Mtor in GSCs, we generated negatively marked GSC clones of wild-type or Mtor k03905 [46] flies using the FLP/FRT mosaic analysis technique [47]. Testes with LacZ (arm-lacZ)-negative clones were counted 1, 2, and 7 days after clone induction (ACI). As expected, in FRT 42D control testes, we were able to find many LacZ-negative GSCs and their differentiated progenies (Fig 2A–2B’ and 2E) at 1, 2, and 7 days ACI. At 1 day ACI, we were also able to find LacZ-negative GSCs and their differentiated progenies (Fig 2C, 2C’ and 2E) in FRT 42D-Mtor k03905 and FRT G13-Mtor k03905 testes. At 2 days ACI, LacZ-negative Mtor homozygous mutant GSCs were recovered at negligible levels compared to control clones (Fig 2D, 2D’ and 2E). At 7 days ACI, we were unable to find a single LacZ-negative GSC or differentiated germ cell in Mtor-mutant testes (Fig 2E).
Fig 2

Mtor cell-autonomously regulates GSC maintenance.

(A–D’) are confocal sections through the apex of the testes containing wild-type (A–B’) or Mtor k03905 (C–D’) clones at the indicated times ACI. The testes were immunostained with anti-vasa (red, marks all germ cells including GSCs), and Fas3 (green, hub cells-asterisks). The wild-type or Mtor k03905 GSC clones are β-galactosidase (green) negative. Dotted lines in A’, B’, C’, D’ represent GSC clones (arrowhead) and their differentiating progeny (arrow). Scale bars represent 10 μm. (E) Quantitative data of β-galactosidase–negative clones in wild-type control (FRT 42D -piM), FRT G13 -Mtor k03905, or FRT 42D -Mtor k03905 fly testes at 1 and 2 days ACI.

Mtor cell-autonomously regulates GSC maintenance.

(A–D’) are confocal sections through the apex of the testes containing wild-type (A–B’) or Mtor k03905 (C–D’) clones at the indicated times ACI. The testes were immunostained with anti-vasa (red, marks all germ cells including GSCs), and Fas3 (green, hub cells-asterisks). The wild-type or Mtor k03905 GSC clones are β-galactosidase (green) negative. Dotted lines in A’, B’, C’, D’ represent GSC clones (arrowhead) and their differentiating progeny (arrow). Scale bars represent 10 μm. (E) Quantitative data of β-galactosidase–negative clones in wild-type control (FRT 42D -piM), FRT G13 -Mtor k03905, or FRT 42D -Mtor k03905 fly testes at 1 and 2 days ACI. We examined cell death using anti-caspase 3 (Cas3) staining and found a significant increase in dead cells in the testes of FRT 42D -Mtor k03905 mosaic clones at 1 day ACI (S4B Fig) compared to wild-type control flies (Nos>LacZ RNAi) (S4A Fig). However, the dead cells were outside the GSC zone. Consistent with this observation, coexpression of the pan-caspase inhibitor p35 did not suppress the GSC loss phenotypes in the Mtor-deficient testes (S4C and S4D Fig), indicating that the GSC loss in the Mtor-deficient testes maybe not through apoptosis.

Mtor cell-autonomously regulates maintenance of CySCs

We also generated GFP positively marked CySC clones of wild-type or Mtor k03905 flies using the mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) technique [48] (Fig 3). As expected, in FRT 42D control testes, we were able to find many GFP-positive CySCs and their differentiated progenies (Fig 3A, 3A’, 3F, 3F’ and 3I) at 1, 2, and 4 days ACI. In FRT 42D -Mtor k03905 testes, GFP-positive Mtor homozygous mutant CySCs were recovered at negligible levels compared to the control clones (Fig 3B–3E’ and 3I) at 1 and 2 days ACI. At 4 days ACI, we were unable to find a single GFP-positive CySC (Fig 3G–3H’ and 3I). However, we could find many GFP-positive differentiated cyst cells (Fig 3D’, 3E’, 3G’ and 3H’) in Mtor-mutant testes at 2 and 4 days ACI. These results together suggest that Mtor is required for CySC self-renewal or attachment to the niche as suggested previously [32] in the c587 >Mtor RNAi flies (S1H Fig). Further, we did not detect any cell death in CySCs lineages in loss of Mtor testes.
Fig 3

Mtor cell-autonomously regulates CySC differentiation.

GFP+ clones were generated in the testes of wild-type control (FRT 42D -piM; A-A’ and F-F’) or FRT42D -Mtor k03905 (B-E’ and G-H’) flies using the MARCM technique and stained at 1, 2, and 4 days ACI with the anti-GFP (green), anti-Vasa (red) and DAPI (blue). In FRT42D control testes, we were able to find many GFP-positive CySCs and their differentiated progenies (A-A’, F-F’, I) at 1, 2, and 4 days ACI. In FRT 42D -Mtor k03905 testes, we were rarely able to find GFP-positive CySCs at 1 and 2 days ACI (B-E’, I). At 4 days ACI, we were not able to find a single GFP-positive CySC in 60 Mtor-mutant testes (G-H’, I). However, we could find many GFP-positive differentiated cyst cells (B-E’ and G-H’) in Mtor-mutant testes at 2 and 4 days ACI. CySCs are highlighted by yellow dotted lines and yellow arrows. White dotted lines arrows highlight GSCs and red arrows point to differentiated cyst cells. Red asterisks mark hubs. Scale bars represent 10 μm. (I) Quantitative data of GFP-positive CySC clones in wild-type control (FRT 42D -piM) or FRT 42D -Mtor k03905 fly testes at 1, 2, and 4 days ACI.

Mtor cell-autonomously regulates CySC differentiation.

GFP+ clones were generated in the testes of wild-type control (FRT 42D -piM; A-A’ and F-F’) or FRT42D -Mtor k03905 (B-E’ and G-H’) flies using the MARCM technique and stained at 1, 2, and 4 days ACI with the anti-GFP (green), anti-Vasa (red) and DAPI (blue). In FRT42D control testes, we were able to find many GFP-positive CySCs and their differentiated progenies (A-A’, F-F’, I) at 1, 2, and 4 days ACI. In FRT 42D -Mtor k03905 testes, we were rarely able to find GFP-positive CySCs at 1 and 2 days ACI (B-E’, I). At 4 days ACI, we were not able to find a single GFP-positive CySC in 60 Mtor-mutant testes (G-H’, I). However, we could find many GFP-positive differentiated cyst cells (B-E’ and G-H’) in Mtor-mutant testes at 2 and 4 days ACI. CySCs are highlighted by yellow dotted lines and yellow arrows. White dotted lines arrows highlight GSCs and red arrows point to differentiated cyst cells. Red asterisks mark hubs. Scale bars represent 10 μm. (I) Quantitative data of GFP-positive CySC clones in wild-type control (FRT 42D -piM) or FRT 42D -Mtor k03905 fly testes at 1, 2, and 4 days ACI.

Loss of Mtor function affects expression and localization of Apc2 and E-cadherin

During wild-type GSC division, the mother (old) centrosome remains anchored near the niche and Apc2 is localized to the interface of the niche and GSCs to anchor the spindles of mitotic GSCs perpendicular to the hub [18,19]. We examined Apc2 localization in wild-type or Mtor-depleted GSCs. After shifting the flies from 18ºC to 29ºC for 3 days, most of the Apc2 was enriched at the cortical region of GSCs adjacent to the hub-GSC interface in wild-type GSCs (Fig 4A, 4A’ and 4C), while a significant amount of Apc2 was distributed over GSC cortex from the hub-GSC interface in the GSCs remaining at the hub in Mtor-depleted (Nos>Mtor RNAi) testes (Figs 4B, 4B’ and 4C and S4E and S4F). Similarly, we found that the expression and localization of E-cadherin at the hub-GSC interface were significantly reduced in Mtor-depleted testes in comparison with those in the wild-type testes (Fig 4D and 4E).
Fig 4

Loss of Mtor function affects expression and localization of Apc2 and E-cadherin.

(A-B’) Apc2 (white) localization was examined in wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) (A-A’) and Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 (B-B’) testes. Red arrows point to Apc2 localization to the hub-GSC interface and white arrowheads point to Apc2 localization over the GSC cortex. The yellow stars indicate the hub. (C) Quantitation of GSCs with Apc2 localization to the hub-GSC interface versus GSCs with Apc2 localization over the GSC cortex in wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) or Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 flies. ***p< 0.0001, Student tests. Error bars represent SD. (D, E) E-cadherin (red) and Arm (green) localization were examined in wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) (D) and Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 (E) testes. White arrows point to E-cadherin localization to the hub-GSC interface. Red asterisks mark hubs. Scale bars are 10 μm in all panels. All flies were cultured for 3 days at 29°C before dissection.

Loss of Mtor function affects expression and localization of Apc2 and E-cadherin.

(A-B’) Apc2 (white) localization was examined in wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) (A-A’) and Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 (B-B’) testes. Red arrows point to Apc2 localization to the hub-GSC interface and white arrowheads point to Apc2 localization over the GSC cortex. The yellow stars indicate the hub. (C) Quantitation of GSCs with Apc2 localization to the hub-GSC interface versus GSCs with Apc2 localization over the GSC cortex in wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) or Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 flies. ***p< 0.0001, Student tests. Error bars represent SD. (D, E) E-cadherin (red) and Arm (green) localization were examined in wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) (D) and Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 (E) testes. White arrows point to E-cadherin localization to the hub-GSC interface. Red asterisks mark hubs. Scale bars are 10 μm in all panels. All flies were cultured for 3 days at 29°C before dissection.

Mtor function is required for the correct centrosome orientation, mitotic spindle formation, and chromosome segregation

We further examined centrosome orientations in wild-type or Mtor-depleted GSCs. After shifting the Nos>Mtor RNAi flies from 18°C to 29°C for 3 days, we found that in the Mtor-depleted testes, remaining GSCs at the hub had an increased frequency of misoriented or multiple centrosomes (Figs 5B, 5C and 5E–5G and S5B–S5D) as compared to GSCs in the wild-type testes (Figs 5A, 5D and 5G and S5A and S6A).
Fig 5

Mtor function is required for the correct centrosome orientation, mitotic spindle formation, and chromosome segregation.

(A-F) Centrosome orientation and number, chromosome segregation and mitotic spindles were examined in testes of wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) (A, D) and Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 (B, C) and Nos>Mtor RNAi-3 (E, F) flies. The testes were stained with α-tubulin (green), γ-tubulin, pH3 (red), and DAPI (blue). Flies were cultured for 3 days (A-D) and 7 days (E, F) at 29°C before dissection The white broken-line circles indicate the hub (asterisks). GSCs with centrosome localization and spindle orientiation are highlighted with yellow dotted lines and white arrowheads (point to centrosomes). Scale bars are 10 μm in all panels. (G) Quantitation of GSCs with oriented versus misoriented centrosomes in GSCs with two centrosomes in wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi), Nos>Mtor RNAi-1, Nos>Mtor RNAi-2, or Nos>Mtor RNAi-3 flies. *** p< 0.0001, Student tests. Error bars represent SD. (H) Summarized the angles of spindle orientation and quantitation of GSCs with mitotic spindle defects in wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) and Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 flies. Error bars represent S.E.

Mtor function is required for the correct centrosome orientation, mitotic spindle formation, and chromosome segregation.

(A-F) Centrosome orientation and number, chromosome segregation and mitotic spindles were examined in testes of wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) (A, D) and Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 (B, C) and Nos>Mtor RNAi-3 (E, F) flies. The testes were stained with α-tubulin (green), γ-tubulin, pH3 (red), and DAPI (blue). Flies were cultured for 3 days (A-D) and 7 days (E, F) at 29°C before dissection The white broken-line circles indicate the hub (asterisks). GSCs with centrosome localization and spindle orientiation are highlighted with yellow dotted lines and white arrowheads (point to centrosomes). Scale bars are 10 μm in all panels. (G) Quantitation of GSCs with oriented versus misoriented centrosomes in GSCs with two centrosomes in wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi), Nos>Mtor RNAi-1, Nos>Mtor RNAi-2, or Nos>Mtor RNAi-3 flies. *** p< 0.0001, Student tests. Error bars represent SD. (H) Summarized the angles of spindle orientation and quantitation of GSCs with mitotic spindle defects in wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) and Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 flies. Error bars represent S.E. Besides the Apc2 localization and centrosome orientation defects, we also observed severe microtubule spindle and chromosome segregation defects in the Mtor-depleted GSCs. After shifting the Nos>Mtor RNAi flies from 18°C to 29°C for 3 days, we found that many phospho-Histone H3 (pH3)-positive GSCs exhibited lagging and scattered chromosome phenotypes (S5B–S5D Fig). The phenotypes became worse after shifting the Nos>Mtor RNAi flies from 18°C to 29°C for 7 days (Figs 5C and 5E and S5F–S5H and S6B–S6E). Most of the pH3-positive GSCs were detached from the hub (Figs 5C and S5F–S5H and S6B–S6E). The microtubule spindles formed were incomplete, unfocused, only half, and/or without clear spindle poles (Figs 5B, 5C and 5E–5H and S5F–S5H and S6B–S6E). At anaphase, some spindles remained, bridging the separated chromosomes (S6B Fig), and the chromosomes were lagging and scattered (Figs 5E and 5H and S5F–S5H and S6E). These observations suggest that the function of Mtor is cell-autonomously required for the correct centrosome orientation, mitotic spindle formation, chromosome segregation, and localization of Apc2 to the hub-GSC interface.

Expression of SAC components rescued GSC defects of Mtor knockout

In the Drosophila S2 and several human cell lines, Tpr/Mtor plays an important role in regulating the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) [26-29]. During interphase, the Tpr/Mtor-Mad1-Mad2 complex regulates generation of a premitotic anaphase inhibitor to protect genome integrity [27-29]. In Mtor-depleted Drosophila S2 cells, accumulation of Mad2 and Mps1 at kinetochores is significantly reduced and the cells enter anaphase prematurely [27]. Therefore, Mtor may regulate GSC maintenance and asymmetric division through SAC. To test this possibility, we expressed UAS-Mtor, UAS-mad2, UAS-Apc2, and UAS-E-cad with the UAS-Mtor RNAi lines using the Nos-Gal4 driver. Expression of either UAS-Mtor or UAS-mad2 significantly rescued the stem cell loss phenotypes of the UAS-Mtor RNAi lines (Fig 6, compared panel A to B and C), while expression of UAS-Apc2 or UAS-E-cad had no function (Fig 6D, 6E and 6G). Further, we also found that expression of UAS-mad2 significantly rescued the reduction of Apc2 localization phenotypes of the UAS-Mtor RNAi line (Fig 6F). Overexpression of Mtor (Nos>Mtor), mad2 (Nos>mad2), Apc2 (Nos>Apc2) and E-cad (Nos>E-cad) alone resulted in no abnormal phenotype (S6H–S6K Fig).
Fig 6

Expression of SAC components rescued GSC defects of Mtor knockout.

(A-E) GSCs in testes of Nos>Mtor RNAi-3 (A), Nos>Mtor RNAi-3+Mtor (B), Nos>Mtor RNAi-3+mad2 (C), Nos>Mtor RNAi-3+Apc2 (D), and Nos>Mtor RNAi-2+E-cad (E) flies were examined by staining with Fas3 (green, hub cells-asterisks), anti-vasa (germ cells including GSCs, white dotted circle (one depicted in a white arrowhead); yellow dotted circle marks the GB (one depicted in yellow arrow) and DAPI (blue). (F) Apc2 (red) localization was examined in Nos>lacZ RNAi +Mad2 testis. Scale bars are 10 μm in all panels. (G) Quantification of the number of GSCs associated with the hub. Coexpression of Mtor (n = 42) or mad2 (n = 44), but not Apc2 (n = 38) or E-cad (n = 43), significantly rescued the GSC loss phenotype associated with Mtor RNAi. All flies were cultured for 7 days at 29°C before dissection.

Expression of SAC components rescued GSC defects of Mtor knockout.

(A-E) GSCs in testes of Nos>Mtor RNAi-3 (A), Nos>Mtor RNAi-3+Mtor (B), Nos>Mtor RNAi-3+mad2 (C), Nos>Mtor RNAi-3+Apc2 (D), and Nos>Mtor RNAi-2+E-cad (E) flies were examined by staining with Fas3 (green, hub cells-asterisks), anti-vasa (germ cells including GSCs, white dotted circle (one depicted in a white arrowhead); yellow dotted circle marks the GB (one depicted in yellow arrow) and DAPI (blue). (F) Apc2 (red) localization was examined in Nos>lacZ RNAi +Mad2 testis. Scale bars are 10 μm in all panels. (G) Quantification of the number of GSCs associated with the hub. Coexpression of Mtor (n = 42) or mad2 (n = 44), but not Apc2 (n = 38) or E-cad (n = 43), significantly rescued the GSC loss phenotype associated with Mtor RNAi. All flies were cultured for 7 days at 29°C before dissection. We further expressed Mtor, mad2, mps1, and Apc2 in Mtor-mutant GSC mosaic clones (Fig 7A). Expression of Mtor, mad2, and mps1 significantly rescued the GSC loss phenotypes of the Mtor-mutant GSC clones, while expression of Apc2 had no significant function. These data suggest that the correct localization of Apc2 and E-cad regulated by the Mtor-SAC axis through mitotic spindle rather than the relative amounts of these proteins are important for GSC maintenance.
Fig 7

Expression of SAC components rescued the Mtor phenotypes in GSC clones.

(A) Quantitative data of β-galactosidase–(green) negative GSC clones in testes of wild-type control (FRT 42D -piM), FRT 42D -Mtor k03905, FRT 42D -Mtor k03905+UAS-Mtor, FRT 42D -Mtor k03905+UAS-mad2, FRT 42D -Mtor k03905+UAS-mps1, and FRT 42D -Mtor k03905+UAS-Apc2 flies at 2 days ACI. Act

Expression of SAC components rescued the Mtor phenotypes in GSC clones.

(A) Quantitative data of β-galactosidase–(green) negative GSC clones in testes of wild-type control (FRT 42D -piM), FRT 42D -Mtor k03905, FRT 42D -Mtor k03905+UAS-Mtor, FRT 42D -Mtor k03905+UAS-mad2, FRT 42D -Mtor k03905+UAS-mps1, and FRT 42D -Mtor k03905+UAS-Apc2 flies at 2 days ACI. ActMtor k03905/ FRT 42D -arm-lacZ; MKRS, hs-flp/UAS-Mtor (or other) flies were used to generate mosaic clones in the rescue experiments. (B) A model of how Mtor regulates asymmetric Apc2 localization, mitotic spindle formation, and asymmetric GSC division. Details are included in the text. These above data together suggest that Mtor/Tpr regulates GSC asymmetric division and maintenance through the mitotic spindle checkpoint complex (Mps1 and Mad2).

Expression of SAC components did not rescue CySC defects of mutant Mtor

The asymmetric division of CySCs occurs through a cellular mechanism strikingly distinct from the one used by GSCs. The mitotic spindle of CySCs first forms in a random location and then repositions during or near the onset of anaphase so that one pole is close to the hub cells [49]. Our above data demonstrated that depletion of Mtor in GSCs resulted in GSC loss, while depletion of Mtor in CySCs resulted in differentiation of CySCs, indicating that Mtor may function differently in GSCs and CySCs. To find out whether Mtor regulates CySCs through the SAC complex, we expressed UAS-mad2 and UAS-mps1 in the UAS-Mtor RNAi lines using the c587-Gal4 driver. Expression of UAS-mad2 and UAS-mps1 did not significantly rescue the phenotypes associated with expressing UAS-Mtor RNAi in somatic cyst cells (they show GSC tumor phenotype; S6L and S6M Fig), suggesting that Mtor functions in GSCs and CySCs through distinct molecular pathways.

Discussion

In male Drosophila GSCs, the asymmetric outcome of stem cell division is specified by an oriented spindle and cortically localized Apc2. However, the molecular mechanism that regulates asymmetric Apc2 localization and formation of the oriented spindle is unclear. In this study, we identified a nucleoporin and spindle matrix protein Tpr/Mtor that regulates GSC asymmetric division and maintenance. Loss of Mtor function results in abnormal Apc2 localization, incorrect centrosome orientation, defective mitotic spindle formation, and abnormal chromosome segregation. We further demonstrated that Mtor regulates GSC asymmetric division and maintenance through the SAC, which regulates asymmetric localization of Apc2 and E-cad. At the cortex, Apc2 and E-cad together anchor the spindles of mitotic GSCs perpendicular to the hub for asymmetric GSC division [19]. Defects in the Mtor-regulated processes may first block cytokinesis, result in polyploidy, and cause eventual loss of GSCs. We do not know how SAC/Mad2 affects APC2 localization. More experiments are needed to find the detailed molecular mechanism. However, in yeast SAC/Mad2 regulates Kar9 (the APC2 homologue) localization through the mitotic exit network (MEN) and Kip2 (kinesin-like protein) [50]. SAC/Mad2 may regulate APC2 localization through a similar mechanism in Drosophila male GSCs.

Additional Mtor functions

In Drosophila S2 cell, Mtor forms a nuclear complex with Mad1/2 in interphase; after nuclear envelope breakdown (NEB), Mad2 is recruited to unattached kinetochores and functions in the SAC complex while Mtor reorganizes into a fusiform structure coalescent with spindle microtubules and plays a role in spindle elongation [27]. In Mtor-knockdown GSCs, we found that many pH3-positive GSCs exhibited lagging and scattered chromosome phenotypes, were detached from the hub; the microtubule spindles formed were incomplete, unfocused, only half, and/or without clear spindle poles. These phenotypes cannot be entirely explained by SAC defects alone. Consistent with this, expression of Mad2 in Mtor GSC mosaic clones could only partially rescue the GSC loss phenotype (Fig 7A). These results suggest that there could be additional factors that together with Mad2 and Mps1 mediate Mtor’s function in GSCs. Further, expression of Mad2 and Mps1 did not rescue Mtor-mutant phenotypes in CySCs, suggesting that Mtor functions differentially in GSCs and CySCs. The yeast homologue of Tpr, Mlp2p, binds to the yeast spindle pole body (SPB) and promotes its efficient assembly [51]. Most recently, it has been shown that Mtor in Drosophila directly binds a tau-tubulin kinase, Asator, and colocalizes to the spindle region with Asator during mitosis [52]. Asator may represent a link between Mtor and the microtubule-based spindle apparatus that facilitates Mtor’s function in regulating microtubule dynamics and microtubule spindle function. Therefore, besides Mps1 and Mad2, Mtor may also regulate mitotic spindle and Apc2 localization through Asator-CLIP190-EB1 and/or the centrosome (Fig 7B).

Mtor’s function in GSCs and CySCs

In the Drosophila testis, the two types of stem cells, GSCs and CySCs, use distinct molecular mechanisms for their asymmetric division. The mitotic spindle of CySCs first forms in a random location within an irregularly shaped CySC, then repositions through functional centrosomes, dynein, and the actin-membrane linker moesin during or near the onset of anaphase so that one pole is close to the hub cells [49]. Therefore, CySCs require moesin, but not Apc2, and GSCs require Apc2, but not moesin, for their orientation. We demonstrated that expression of Mad2 and Mps1 could rescue Mtor-mutant phenotypes in GSCs but not in CySCs, suggesting that the Tpr/Mtor-SAC pathway regulates asymmetric Apc2 localization for asymmetric GSC division, but not asymmetric moesin localization for asymmetric CySC division. In c587 >Mtor RNAi flies, the Tj-positive and Eya-positive cells were pushed away from the niche by the expanding undifferentiated germ cells, suggesting that the Mtor-deficient CySCs have disadvantage in niche occupancy. Consistent with the Mtor RNAi result, the Mtor mutant CySCs generated by the MARCM technique were quickly moved out of the niche and became differentiated cyst cells (Fig 3). These results together suggest that the main function of Mtor in CySCs is to regulate their attachment to the niche.

General significance in human diseases

Dividing eukaryotic cells have to establish correct bipolar attachment of a pair of sister kinetochores residing on each mitotic chromosome to the mitotic spindle for delivering duplicated chromosomes to separate daughter cells. This process is regulated by components of the SAC. Defects in the SAC will result in improper segregation, aneuploidy, and chromosome lagging, which are linked to birth defects and cancer in animals and humans. Aneuploidy has been recognized as a major driver of cancer [53]. Our study results have demonstrated that the Tpr/Mtor through SAC regulates Apc2 localization and asymmetric GSC division. Disruption of Mtor function resulted in defective mitotic spindle and abnormal chromosome segregation. Tpr was fused together with oncogenes met, raf, and kit in several kinds of tumors [54-56]. It is reasonable to propose that disruption of the Tpr-SAC pathway in these tumors might lead to chromosome instability, chromosome lagging, and aneuploidy, stem cell division defects, and thereby tumor development.

Materials and Methods

Drosophila stocks and culture

Oregon R or UAS-lacZ RNAi was used as the wild type. Mtor k03905 was previously described [46] and obtained from the Bloomington stock center. The P-element insertion in the Mtor k03905 resulted in a 9-base pair duplication, including 8 base pairs of upstream genomic sequence and a duplicated +1 residue and may represent a null mutation. To generate transgenic strains of UAS-mad2, UAS-mps1, and UAS-Mtor, the corresponding full-length cDNAs of the Drosophila genes were amplified by PCR and inserted into the pUAST transformation vector [57]. Second-chromosome UAS-Apc2 transgenic flies were from David Roberts. UAS-DEFL (full-length shg) #6–3 was obtained from Kyoto stock center. UAS-Egfr DN was obtained from the Bloomington stock center (BL5364). All constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing. The UAS constructs were injected into w 1118 embryos using standard procedures. RNAi stocks used in this study: Mtor RNAi-1 (Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center-VDRC) Transformant ID 110218 [v110218]), Mtor RNAi-2 (BL32941), Mtor RNAi-3 (v24265), and rl RNAi (v35641). The sequences used for VDRC knockdown strains are available for each line at and sequences for Bloomington knock-down strains are available for each line at . The following Gal4 alleles were used to drive UAS lines: Nos-Gal4 (nanos-Gal4VP16) [58], obtained from the Bloomington stock center (BL4937), and upd-Gal4 and c587-Gal4, provided by Ting Xie. esg-Gal4 was obtained from Shigeo Hayashi. Collagen (Cg)-Gal4 [37], Dilp2-Gal4 [38], LE-Gal4 [39], pumpless (ppl)-Gal4 [40], brachyenteron (byn)-Gal4 [41], serpent (srp )-Gal4 [42], Aug21-Gal4 [43], hemolectin (hml)-Gal4 [44], and MS1096-Gal4 [45]. Flies were raised on standard fly food at 25°C and at 65% humidity, unless otherwise indicated.

Generating mutant GSC clones

Clones of mutant GSCs were generated as previously described [6]. To generate Mtor-mutant GSC clones, FRT 42D + and FRT 42D Mtor k03905/Cyo virgin females were mated with males of genotype FRT 42D arm-lacZ/Cyo; MKRS, hs-flp/+, or FRT G13 Mtor k03905/Cyo virgin females were mated with males of genotype FRT G13 arm-lacZ/Cyo; MKRS, hs-flp/+. One- or 2-day-old adult males carrying an arm-lacZ transgene in trans to the mutant-bearing chromosome were heat shocked four times at 37°C for 1 hr, at intervals of 8–12 hr. The males were transferred to fresh food every day at 25°C. The testes were removed 1, 2, or 7 days after the first heat-shock treatment and processed for antibody staining.

MARCM clonal analysis

To induce MARCM clones of FRT 42D -piM (as a wild-type control) and FRT 42D -Mtor k03905, we generated the following flies: FRT 42D tub-Gal80/FRT 42D Mtor k03905 (or piM); MKRS, hs-flp/ tub-Gal4,UAS-mCD8.GFP. Three- or 4-day-old adult male flies were heat-shocked twice at 37°C for 45 min, with an interval of 8–12 hr. The flies were transferred to fresh food daily after the final heat shock. The testes were removed at 1, 2, or 7 days after the first heat-shock treatment and processed for antibody staining.

RNAi-mediated gene depletion

Male UAS-RNAi transgene flies were crossed with female virgins of genotype Nos-Gal4, upd-Gal4, c587-Gal4; tub-Gal80 ts (c587 ts), or esg-Gal4, UAS-GFP; tub-Gal80 ts (esg ts). The flies were cultured at 18°C (Gal4 is inactive and Gal80 is active). Three- to 5-day-old adult flies with the appropriate genotype were transferred to new vials at 29°C (Gal4 is active and Gal80 is inactive) for 3 or 7 days before dissection.

Immunofluorescence staining and microscopy

Normal immunofluorescence staining was performed as described previously with some modifications [6]. Briefly, testes were dissected in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), transferred to 4% formaldehyde in PBS, and fixed for 30 minutes. The testes were then washed in PBST (PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100) for 3 times, 10 Minutes each time, then blocked with 5% goat serum in PBST for 1 hour. Samples were the incubated with primary antibody in PBST at 4°C overnight. Samples were washed for 30 minutes (three 10-minute washes) in PBST, incubated with secondary antibody in PBST at room temperature for 2 hours, washed as above, and mounted in VECTASHIELD with DAPI (Vector Labs). For the γ-tubulin staining, testes were dissected in PBS, transferred to 4% formaldehyde in PBS, and fixed for 20 minutes, followed by incubation with methanol for 10 minutes. Then washed for 10 minutes with PBST, and two 10-minutes washes with 5% goat serum PBST. Then incubated in primary antibody in 5% goat serum in PBST overnight at 4°C. Then washed three times, 15 min each in PBST, followed with 2 hrs incubation with secondary antibody in 5% goat serum in PBST. Then washed for at least an hour with PBST, and mounted as above. Caspase-3 activity was assessed using Live Green Caspase Detection Kits (I35106, Molecular Probes) according to standard protocol. Confocal images were obtained by using a Zeiss LSM510 system, and were processed with Adobe Photoshop 7.0. GSCs were scored as Vasa-positive cells adjacent to the hub (detected using Fas3) and containing dot spectrosome (detected using 1B1). Only image with a clear view of the complete hub were used. The following antisera were used: rabbit polyclonal anti-Vasa antibody (1:5000; gift from R. Lehmann), rabbit polyclonal anti-β-Gal antibody (1:1000; Cappel), mouse monoclonal anti-β-Gal antibody (1:100; Invitrogen), mouse monoclonal anti-Hts antibody 1B1 (1:4; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank [DSHB]), mouse monoclonal anti-Fas 3 antibody (1:10; DSHB), rat polyclonal anti-Tj (1:400; Li et al. [59], mouse monoclonal anti-Eya (1:20, DSHB), mouse monoclonal anti-Dl (1:20; DSHB), mouse monoclonal anti-Pros (1:50; DSHB), rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP antibody (1:200; Molecular Probes), mouse monoclonal anti-GFP antibody (1:100; Invitrogen), rabbit polyclonal anti-Caspase 3 antibody (1:1000; gift from B. Hay); rabbit polyclonal anti-Thr3-phosphorylated histone H3 antibody (1:200; upstate), mouse monoclonal anti-α-tubulin antibody (1:100; Sigma), mouse monoclonal anti-γ-tubulin antibody (1:100; Sigma), guinea pig polyclonal anti-Zfh1 (1:2000; gift from J. Skeath), mouse monoclonal anti-Mtor antibody (1:100; gift from K. Johansen), rabbit polyclonal anti-Apc2 antibody (1:5000; gift from M. Bienz). Secondary antibodies were goat anti-mouse, goat anti-guinea pig, and goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to Alexa 488 or Alexa 568 (1:400; Molecular Probes). DAPI (Molecular Probes) was used to stain DNA.

Score of centrosome and spindle orientation

We scored the centrosome misorientation and spindle misorientation following the protocol described by Yamashita et al. [19, 60]. Specifically, centrosome misorientation was noted when neither of two centrosomes were closely associated with hub-GSC interface during interphase and at mitosis. Spindle misorientation was scored when neither of the two spindle poles was closely associated with hub-GSC interface during mitosis [19, 60].

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel 2010 or GraphPad Prism 6 software. Data are shown as means ± SD or standard error of the mean (SEM). P-values were obtained between two groups using the Student’s t-test or between more than two groups by analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Mtor’s function is required in CySCs.

(A and B) GSCs in testes of c587 ts >LacZ RNAi (A), c587 ts >Mtor RNAi-2 (B), c587 ts >Egfr DN (C), and c587 ts >rl RNAi (D) flies were examined by staining with anti-vasa (red, marks all germ cells including GSCs), Fas3 (green, hub cells), anti-1B1 (green in dot and branched marks the spectrosomes and fusomes respectively) and DAPI (blue). Hub cells are marked by asterisks. In A, white dotted circle with white arrow marks GSCs and yellow dotted circle with yellow arrow marks GB. In B-D, white dotted circles mark expended GSCs or GSC-like cells and white arrowheads point to 1B1 dots. (E-G) GSCs in testes of c587 ts >LacZ RNAi (E, G) and c587 ts >Mtor RNAi-2 (F, H). GSCs in testes of c587 ts >LacZ RNAi (E) and c587 ts >Mtor RNAi-2 (F) flies were examined by staining with anti-vasa (red, marks all germ cells including GSCs), Fas3 (green, hub cells), anti-Eya (late stage cyst cells, green arrows) and DAPI (blue). GSCs in testes of c587 ts >LacZ RNAi (G) and c587 ts >Mtor RNAi-2 (H) flies were examined by staining with anti-vasa (green, marks all germ cells including GSCs), Tj (red, CySC and early cyst cells), and DAPI (blue). In E anf G, white dotted circle with white arrowhead marks GSCs and yellow dotted circle with yellow arrow marks GB. In F and H, white dotted circles mark expended GSCs or GSC-like cells and red arrows point to Tj-positive cells. Green arrows in E and F point to Eya-positive cells. Scale bars are 10 μm in all panels. All flies were cultured for 7 days at 29°C before dissection. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Mtor’s function is not required in hub cells, ISCs, and several other cell types.

(A and B) GSCs in testes of upd>LacZ RNAi (A) and upd>Mtor RNAi-2 (B) flies were examined by staining with anti-vasa (red, marks all germ cells including GSCs (white arrowhead and white dotted circle), anti-1B1 (green in dot and branched marks the spectrosomes and fusomes respectively), and DAPI (blue). (C and D) ISCs in adult posterior midguts of wild-type control (esg ts >lacZ RNAi) (C) or esg ts >Mtor RNAi-2 (D) flies were examined by staining with anti-GFP (green, marks ISCs and enteroblast cells), anti-delta (red, ISCs), anti-Pros (red nuclear staining marks enteroendocrine cells) and DAPI (blue). Scale bars are 10 μm in all panels. All flies were cultured for 7 days at 29°C before dissection. (E) UAS-Mtor RNAi-2 was expressed with the nine Gal4s listed. Only the ms1096>Mtor RNAi-2 flies had wing phenotypes, and the other eight Gal4>Mtor RNAi-2 flies had no abnormal phenotypes. All flies were cultured for 7 days at 29°C before examination. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Mtor is required for GSC maintenance.

(A-B) GSCs in testes of wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) (A) or Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 (B), were examined by staining with the indicated antibodies. CySCs (Zfh1 positive cells) located outside GSCs in wild type testis (A), however some CySCs positioned adjacent to the hub cells after some GSCs were depleted in Mtor-deficient testis (B). (C-D’) Testes of wild-type control (Act ts >lacZ RNAi) (C-C’) or Act ts >Mtor RNAi-2 (D-D’) flies were stained with anti-Mtor (green) and DAPI (blue). Testes of wild-type control (E,F) flies were stained with anti-Mtor (green), NUP98 (red), and DAPI (blue). The broken line circles with asterisks mark the hubs and other broken line circles mark GSCs. All flies were cultured for 7 days at 29°C before dissection. Scale bars are 10 μm in all panels. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

The GSC loss in Mtor-deficient testes is not through apoptosis.

(A,B) Testes of wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) (A), and a testis with FRT 42D -Mtor k03905 mosaic clones (1 day ACI, B) were examined by staining with Caspase 3 (Cas3, green) and DAPI (blue). (C,D) Expression of p35 in the testis of Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 (C) or in the testis with FRT 42D -Mtor k03905 mosaic clones (2 days ACI, D) did not rescue the GSC loss phenotypes of the Mtor mutants. We assessed the rescue of GSC death in the testis of Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 (C) or in the testis with FRT 42D -Mtor k03905 (D) by counting the number of GSC attached to the hub in C and number of GSC clones in D. The testes were examined by staining with Fas3, LacZ (green), Vasa (red), and DAPI (green). White circle lines indicate GSC clones. Asterisks mark hub cells. (E,F) Apc2 (white) localization was examined in testes of Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 flies. White arrowheads point to Apc2 localization to the hub-GSC interface and red arrows point to Apc2 localization over the GSC cortex. The yellow stars indicate the hub. Scale bars are 10 μm in all panels. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. (A-C) Centrosome orientation was examined in wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) (A) and Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 (B, C) testes. The testes were stained with γ-tubulin (green) and pH3 (red) and DAPI (blue). The broken-line circles with asterisks indicate the hubs. GSCs are highlighted with yellow dotted lines. White arrowheads point to the centrosome localization. Yellow arrows in B and C point to abnormally condensed chromosomes. (D) Abnormal chromosome segregation was observed in Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 GSCs. The testes were stained with the α-tubulin (green) and pH3 (red) and DAPI (blue). The broken-line circle with asterisk marks the hub. Yellow arrows point to abnormally segregated chromosomes and white arrows point to abnormal mitotic spindles. (E-H) Mitotic spindles and chromosomes were examined in testes of wild-type control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) (E) and Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 (F-H) flies. The testes were stained with the α-tubulin (green), γ-tubulin (red), pH3 (red) and DAPI (blue). The white broken-line circles with asterisks mark the hubs. White arrowheads in E point to the centrosome localization. Yellow arrow in F points to the lagging chromosome. Yellow arrows in G and H point to abnormally condensed and segregated chromosomes. All flies were cultured for 7 days at 29°C before dissection. Scale bars are 10 μm in all panels. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. (A-D) Mitotic spindles and chromosomes were examined in testes of Control (Nos>lacZ RNAi) (A), Nos>Mtor RNAi-3 (B,D) and Nos>Mtor RNAi-2 (C,E) flies. The testes were stained with the pH3 (red), α-tubulin (green) and DAPI (blue). The white broken-line circles with asterisks mark the hubs. The yellow broken-line circles mark GSCs. White arrow in B points to the spindle bridge of segregated chromosomes. Yellow arrows in C and D point to abnormally condensed and segregated chromosomes. Yellow arrow in E points to the lagging chromosome. (F,G) mitotic spindles and chromosomes were examined in adult posterior midgut ISCs of esg>Mtor RNAi-2 and stain with pH3 (red), α-tubulin (green) and DAPI (blue). (H-K) GSCs in testes of Nos>Mtor (H), Nos>mad2 (I), Nos>Apc2 (J), and Nos>E-cad (K) flies were examined by staining with the anti-vasa (red, marks all germ cells including GSCs), Fas3 (green, hub cells), anti-1B1 (green in dot and branched marks the spectrosomes and fusomes respectively) and DAPI (blue). White dotted circles with white arrow mark GSCs, yellow dotted circles with yellow arrow mark GB, red dotted circles mark CySCs, and asterisks mark hubs. GSCs in testes of (L) c587>Mtor +UAS-Mad2 and (M) c587>Mtor +UAS-Mps1 flies were examined by staining with the anti-vasa (red, marks all germ cells including GSCs), Fas3 (green, hub cells), anti-1B1 (green in dot and branched marks the spectrosomes and fusomes respectively) and DAPI (blue). Dotted lines mark GSC tumor phenotype, and asterisks mark hub cells. Scale bars are 10 μm in all panels. All flies were cultured for 7 days at 29°C before dissection. (TIFF) Click here for additional data file.
  60 in total

1.  Coupling of Jun amino-terminal kinase and Decapentaplegic signaling pathways in Drosophila morphogenesis.

Authors:  B Glise; S Noselli
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  A Drosophila resource of transgenic RNAi lines for neurogenetics.

Authors:  Jian-Quan Ni; Lu-Ping Liu; Richard Binari; Robert Hardy; Hye-Seok Shim; Amanda Cavallaro; Matthew Booker; Barret D Pfeiffer; Michele Markstein; Hui Wang; Christians Villalta; Todd R Laverty; Lizabeth A Perkins; Norbert Perrimon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Mechanism of met oncogene activation.

Authors:  M Park; M Dean; C S Cooper; M Schmidt; S J O'Brien; D G Blair; G F Vande Woude
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-06-20       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  The TPR-MET oncogenic rearrangement is present and expressed in human gastric carcinoma and precursor lesions.

Authors:  N R Soman; P Correa; B A Ruiz; G N Wogan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  TRK-T1 is a novel oncogene formed by the fusion of TPR and TRK genes in human papillary thyroid carcinomas.

Authors:  A Greco; M A Pierotti; I Bongarzone; S Pagliardini; C Lanzi; G Della Porta
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  The PDGF/VEGF receptor controls blood cell survival in Drosophila.

Authors:  Katja Brückner; Lutz Kockel; Peter Duchek; Carlos M Luque; Pernille Rørth; Norbert Perrimon
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  A Drosophila Tpr protein homolog is localized both in the extrachromosomal channel network and to nuclear pore complexes.

Authors:  G Zimowska; J P Aris; M R Paddy
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Identification of protein p270/Tpr as a constitutive component of the nuclear pore complex-attached intranuclear filaments.

Authors:  V C Cordes; S Reidenbach; H R Rackwitz; W W Franke
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1997-02-10       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult Drosophila tissues.

Authors:  T Xu; G M Rubin
Journal:  Development       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes.

Authors:  A H Brand; N Perrimon
Journal:  Development       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Subcellular Specialization and Organelle Behavior in Germ Cells.

Authors:  Yukiko M Yamashita
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Whole-animal genome-wide RNAi screen identifies networks regulating male germline stem cells in Drosophila.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Qinglan Ge; Brian Chan; Hanhan Liu; Shree Ram Singh; Jacob Manley; Jae Lee; Ann Marie Weideman; Gerald Hou; Steven X Hou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Predominant Asymmetrical Stem Cell Fate Outcome Limits the Rate of Niche Succession in Human Colonic Crypts.

Authors:  Craig Stamp; Anze Zupanic; Ashwin Sachdeva; Elizabeth A Stoll; Daryl P Shanley; John C Mathers; Thomas B L Kirkwood; Rakesh Heer; Benjamin D Simons; Doug M Turnbull; Laura C Greaves
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 8.143

4.  Targeting MAD2 modulates stemness and tumorigenesis in human Gastric Cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Natalia Pajuelo-Lozano; Sonia Alcalá; Bruno Sainz; Rosario Perona; Isabel Sanchez-Perez
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 11.556

5.  Blood glucose promotes dengue virus infection in the mosquito Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  Shih-Che Weng; Po-Nien Tsao; Shin-Hong Shiao
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.876

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.