Literature DB >> 26714245

Automated measurement of fracture callus in radiographs using portable software.

Stephen M Porter1, Hannah L Dailey2, Katherine A Hollar3, Karina Klein4, James A Harty5, Trevor J Lujan3.   

Abstract

The development of software applications that assist the radiographic evaluation of fracture healing could advance clinical diagnosis and expedite the identification of effective treatment strategies. A radiographic feature regularly used as an outcome measure for basic and clinical fracture healing research is new bone growth, or fracture callus. In this study, we developed OrthoRead, a portable software application that uses image-processing algorithms to detect and measure fracture callus in plain radiographs. OrthoRead utilizes an optimal boundary tracking algorithm to semi-automatically segment the cortical surface, and a novel iterative thresholding selection algorithm to then automatically segment the fracture callus. The software was validated in three steps. First, algorithm accuracy and sensitivity were analyzed using surrogate models with known callus size. Second, the callus area of distal femur fractures measured using OrthoRead was compared to callus area manually outlined by orthopaedic surgeons. Third, the callus area of ovine tibial fractures was measured using OrthoRead and compared to callus volume measured from micro-CT. The software had less than a 5% error in measuring surrogate callus, and was insensitive to changes in image resolution, image rotation, and the size of the analyzed region of interest. Strong positive correlations existed between OrthoRead and clinicians (R(2)  = 0.98), and between 2D callus area and 3D callus volume (R(2)  = 0.70). The average run time for OrthoRead was 3 s when using a 2.7 GHz processor. By being accurate, fast, and robust, OrthoRead can support prospective and retrospective clinical studies investigating implant efficacy, and can assist research on fracture healing mechanobiology.
© 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:1224-1233, 2016. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  callus; computer aided diagnosis; fracture; radiography; segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26714245      PMCID: PMC5166988          DOI: 10.1002/jor.23146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  28 in total

1.  Accuracy of cancellous bone volume fraction measured by micro-CT scanning.

Authors:  M Ding; A Odgaard; I Hvid
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  United snakes.

Authors:  Jianming Liang; Tim McInerney; Demetri Terzopoulos
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases.

Authors:  M Schütz; M Müller; C Krettek; D Höntzsch; P Regazzoni; R Ganz; N Haas
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures for the assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation.

Authors:  Daniel B Whelan; Mohit Bhandari; David Stephen; Hans Kreder; Michael D McKee; Rad Zdero; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-03

5.  Correlations of radiographic analysis of healing fractures with strength: a statistical analysis of experimental osteotomies.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; S D Walter; M Karuda; A A White; J P Lawson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Micro-CT analysis with multiple thresholds allows detection of bone formation and resorption during ultrasound-treated fracture healing.

Authors:  Theresa A Freeman; Payal Patel; Javad Parvizi; Valentin Antoci; Irving M Shapiro
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Effect of initial postoperative visit radiographs on treatment plans.

Authors:  Timothy N Ghattas; Bradley R Dart; Anthony G A Pollock; Steven Hinkin; Anh Pham; Teresa L Jones
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Minimal-invasive treatment of distal femoral fractures with the LISS (Less Invasive Stabilization System): a prospective study of 30 fractures with a follow up of 20 months.

Authors:  Florian Fankhauser; Gerald Gruber; Gert Schippinger; Christian Boldin; Herwig P Hofer; Wolfgang Grechenig; Rudolf Szyszkowitz
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-02

9.  Radiographic union score for hip substantially improves agreement between surgeons and radiologists.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; Mary M Chiavaras; Naveen Parasu; Hema Choudur; Olufemi Ayeni; Rajesh Chakravertty; Simrit Bains; Alisha Hak; Sheila Sprague; Brad Petrisor
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Tibia shaft fractures: costly burden of nonunions.

Authors:  Evgeniya Antonova; T Kim Le; Russel Burge; John Mershon
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  3 in total

1.  Loss of scleraxis in mice leads to geometric and structural changes in cortical bone, as well as asymmetry in fracture healing.

Authors:  Jennifer A McKenzie; Evan Buettmann; Adam C Abraham; Michael J Gardner; Matthew J Silva; Megan L Killian
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Sternal transplant using cadaveric allograft: quantitative and qualitative assessment of bone healing by computed tomography.

Authors:  Chiara Giraudo; Francesca Nistri; Pia Ferrigno; Giampiero Dolci; Roberto Stramare; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Marco Mammana; Emilio Quaia; Domenica Giunta; Andrea Dell'Amore; Federico Rea
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-02

Review 3.  Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Andrea Schwab; Riccardo Levato; Matteo D'Este; Susanna Piluso; David Eglin; Jos Malda
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 60.622

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.