Literature DB >> 26713308

Osteoporotic Fracture: 2015 Position Statement of the Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Je-Hyun Yoo1, Seong-Hwan Moon2, Yong-Chan Ha3, Dong Yeon Lee4, Hyun Sik Gong4, Si Young Park5, Kyu Hyun Yang6.   

Abstract

Osteoporotic fractures are one of the most common causes of disability and a major contributor to medical care costs worldwide. Prior osteoporotic fracture at any site is one of the strongest risk factors for a new fracture, which occurs very soon after the first fracture. Bone mineral density (BMD) scan, a conventional diagnostic tool for osteoporosis, has clear limitations in diagnosing osteoporotic fractures and identifying the risk of subsequent fractures. Therefore, early and accurate diagnosis of osteoporotic fractures using the clinical definition which is applicable practically and independent of BMD, is essential for preventing subsequent fractures and reducing the socioeconomic burden of these fractures. Fractures caused by low-level trauma equivalent to a fall from a standing height or less at major (hip, spine, distal radius, and proximal humerus) or minor (pelvis, sacrum, ribs, distal femur and humerus, and ankle) sites in adults over age 50, should be first regarded as osteoporotic. In addition, if osteoporotic fractures are strongly suspected on history and physical examination even though there are no positive findings on conventional X-rays, more advanced imaging techniques such as computed tomography, bone scan, and magnetic resonance imaging are necessary as soon as possible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Definition; Diagnosis; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic fractures; Practice guidelines as topic

Year:  2015        PMID: 26713308      PMCID: PMC4691591          DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2015.22.4.175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Metab        ISSN: 2287-6375


INTRODUCTION

The costs and implications of osteoporotic fractures for national health care systems are increasing rapidly, and as a result, intense efforts are being made to prevent second osteoporotic fractures in people who have already had first.[1] The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined osteoporosis as a metabolic bone disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue leading to enhanced bone fragility and a consequent increase in fracture risk. The bone mineral density (BMD) scan is currently the gold standard assessment tool for diagnosing osteoporosis, which is measured at the lumbar spine and hip. However, diagnosing osteoporosis relying solely on BMD T-total scores identifies fewer than 50% of people who go on to have an osteoporotic fracture.[2] In addition, fractures at other sites such as the humerus or forearm contribute significantly to the burden of osteoporosis, particularly in younger individuals in whom osteoporotic fractures at sites other than the hip and spine are much more common.[3] As populations age, a number of studies have classified fractures of the vertebrae, proximal femur, and distal radius as the main osteoporotic fractures and have also included fractures of the pelvis, subtrochanter and diaphysis of the femur, ankle, and rib.[234567] To date, the importance of fractures at sites other than the main fracture site has been emphasized as contributing to the numbers of fractures and increasing the socioeconomic burden. As described above, osteoporotic fractures are defined as fractures at sites associated with low BMD, but low BMD alone might not fully detect the risk.[28] In addition, osteoporotic fractures are not always associated with low BMD. Therefore, more accessible and effective tool for diagnosing osteoporotic fractures is critical for reducing the risk and burden of subsequent fractures after the first one. The objective of this review is to define osteoporotic fracture more practically and to present a more clinically applicable and useful tool for its diagnosis than the conventional method that depends only on areal BMD.

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES IN KOREA

Since 1993, a number of studies regarding osteoporotic fracture have been conducted in Korea using cohort or nationwide medical claims database.[9101112] The first was by Rowe et al.,[11] who reported a hip fracture incidence of 33 per 100,000 adults (37/100,000 in men and 31/100,000 in women) using a cohort in Honam. These authors also performed a 10-year follow-up study in 2005 in Gwangju City and Chonnam Province and reported a hip fracture incidence of 133 per 100,000 adults (113/100,000 in men and 148/100,000 in women); the incidence increased fourfold over the 10-year study period.[10] Recently, a longitudinal cohort study of adults over age 50 on Jeju Island reported that the crude incidence of hip fractures had increased from 126.6 per 100,000 in 2002 (70.9/100,000 in men and 167.9/100,000 in women) to 183.7/100,000 in 2011 (89.4/100,000 in men and 261.9/100,000 in women).[9] The annual increase in hip fractures was 4.3% (5.3% in women and 2.2% in men).[8] Members of the Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research and the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), using HIRA data, reported that the incidence of osteoporotic fractures (hip, spine, distal radius, and humerus), in adults aged 50 or over between 2005 and 2008 had increased from 189,856 in 2005 to 210,592 in 2008. In 2008, the incidence of spine fractures was highest (969 per 100,000 persons), followed by the distal radius (422), hip (157), and humerus (81).[12] These findings reflect a trend of increasing numbers of osteoporotic fractures in Korea.

IMPLICATION OF CORTICAL THINNING AND POROSITY IN OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURE

Cortical porosity is relatively more marked in men, whereas cortical thinning prevails more in women, especially in the early stages.[13] The cortical bone, as a source of fragility, has more often been the focus for determining bone strength than the trabecular bone. Cortical bone loss occurs mainly at the endosteal surface and partly in the Haversian canals.[14] As endosteal resorption occurs, periosteal apposition also progresses to compensate, which partially preserves bone strength. However, cortical thinning reduces the resistance to compressive and bending forces, and is prone to leading to osteoporotic fracture.[15] Many studies have reported that the cortical thickness of bones including the tibia, humerus, metacarpal bone, and mandible can be used as an alternative for determining the risk of an osteoporotic fracture.[16171819] A recent review reported that the estimated cortical thickness of the mid-femoral neck might be of most importance in determining resistance to fracture.[20] Cortical porosity can be also used to identify the risk of osteoporotic fracture, but only the porosity of the outer compact-appearing cortex, not that of the inner transitional zone.[21]

DEFINITION OF OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURE

Osteoporotic (fragility) fractures are fractures that result from mechanical forces that would not ordinarily result in a fracture, known as low-level (or low-energy) trauma according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines. The WHO has quantified low-level trauma that causes osteoporotic fracture as force equivalent to a fall from a standing height or less. In addition, many clinicians consider the presence of an osteoporotic fracture (fracture caused by inadequate or mild trauma such as falling from standing height) as sufficient for a diagnosis of osteoporosis regardless of the patient's BMD.[22] According to the conventional diagnosis based on the BMD T-score, osteoporosis is defined as T-score ≤-2.5 standard deviation (SD) or the presence of a prevalent fragility fracture despite T-score >-2.5 SD.[232425] Osteoporotic fractures are associated with low BMD measured at the fracture site. However, the occurrence of osteoporotic fracture is not always associated with low bone density equivalent to osteoporosis, and in most cases, central BMD measures assessed mainly at the lumbar spine and the proximal femur are used (Fig. 1).[26]
Fig. 1

A fracture of the right femoral neck in a 76-year-old male patient is shown on a preoperative radiograph. The fracture was caused by a simple fall from a bed. There was no finding of osteoporosis on dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measured at the proximal femur and lumbar spine.

Based on the description above, clinical criteria are needed for defining osteoporotic fractures at sites other than the lumbar spine and proximal femur, which are not commonly used for measuring BMD, in order to recognize these fractures and initiate timely and appropriate therapy. The above-described definition of osteoporotic fracture can be easily obtained from the history of injury and radiographic findings. This clinically applicable definition of osteoporotic fracture regardless of BMD can determine the risk of second fractures and reduce the associated socioeconomic burdens.

ANATOMIC SITES OF OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES

Common osteoporotic fracture sites include bones that are under strain because they bear weight (such as the spine, hip, and pelvis) or that take the stress when a person catches him- or herself when falling from a standing height or less (such as the wrist, forearm, and upper arm). Osteoporotic fractures occur mainly at sites that are associated with low BMD and increase in incidence after the age of 50.[27] Conventionally, the spine, hip, and distal radius have long been regarded as the quintessential osteoporotic fracture sites. However, large studies have shown that nearly all types of fractures occur more often in patients with low bone density irrespective of the site.[32829] Patients who have fractures at typical osteoporotic sites (spine, hip, wrist, and humerus) are most likely to have low BMD, but 74% of patients with fractures at less typical sites (ankle, hand, foot, other sites) also have low BMD at either the hip or the spine.[30] This finding reinforces the recommendation that history of any low-trauma fracture at any site should be an indication for osteoporosis evaluation. According to NICE and National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) guidelines, osteoporotic fractures occur most commonly in the spine, hip, and distal radius but may also occur in the humerus, pelvis, ribs, and other bones. The WHO considers proximal humerus fractures to be one of the major osteoporotic fractures. Recently, fractures of the pelvic ring in older populations have been classified as osteoporotic because this fracture type is caused by low-energy trauma or no trauma in populations with osteoporosis. Low-energy falls are responsible for the majority of pelvic insufficiency fractures, and moreover, up to two-thirds of sacral insufficiency fractures have been noted to occur in the absence of trauma in older populations.[31] In addition, rib fractures from low-energy trauma have been reported as common non-vertebral fractures in the elderly.[3233] These studies revealed an increasing pattern of fracture incidence, and a history of rib fracture carried at least a twofold increased risk of a subsequent osteoporotic fracture. In addition, ankle fractures have gained increasing attention as another type of fragility fracture.[434] Low-energy ankle fractures can offer significant implications for identifying patients who need osteoporosis treatment. One population-based study identified radiologic findings and trauma history as valid tools for assessing osteoporotic ankle fractures.[35] Following the description above, Table 1 lists what are considered to be the major and minor sites of osteoporotic fractures (Fig. 2, 3).
Table 1

Sites of osteoporotic fractures

Fig. 2

Typical osteoporotic fractures at major sites. (A) Hip, (B) Spine, (C) Distal radius, (D) Proximal humerus.

Fig. 3

Typical osteoporotic fractures at minor sites. (A) Pelvis, (B) Sacrum, (C) Ribs, (D) Distal femur, (E) Distal humerus, (F) Ankle.

All of these fractures should be assessed based on the clinical and research evidence and considering the benefits of osteoporosis management, including reducing the risk of osteoporotic fractures.

THE AGES OF POPULATIONS WITH OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES

Osteoporotic fractures and the associated costs are expected to increase markedly as populations age.[36] These fractures are associated with low bone mass, and their incidence increases with age after the age of 50. The estimated lifetime risk for an osteoporotic fracture among 50-year-old women in North America is approximately 18% for hip fracture, 16% for clinically diagnosed vertebral fracture, and 16% for distal radius fracture.[37] Overall, the NOF estimates that 1 in 2 white women and 1 in 4 white men older than age 50 will sustain at least 1 osteoporosis-related fracture in their remaining lifetimes.[38] Prior osteoporotic fracture in this population is an important predictor of future fractures.[39] Therefore, fractures at the sites described above in adults over age 50 should be strongly suspected as osteoporotic. Their neglect ultimately can underestimate the burden of osteoporosis and lead to subsequent fractures, particularly in relatively younger individuals. Finally, a recent fracture at any skeletal site described above in an adult older than 50 years of age should be considered a significant event for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and should trigger further assessment and treatment if necessary.

DIAGNOSIS OF OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURE

Conventional X-rays are the first step of the diagnostic work-up to detect osteoporotic fracture. Simple X-rays can easily detect the presence of fractures, particularly in the upper and lower extremities, but occult fractures at any site are very difficult to diagnose on simple X-ray. If occult fracture is highly suspected on history and physical examination, computed tomography (CT), bone scintigraphy (BS), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are recommended as additional diagnostic tools to confirm osteoporotic fracture. In general, osteoporotic fractures of the vertebrae and the pelvic ring and their severity are often underdiagnosed or underestimated on conventional X-rays because of inadequate film quality, lack of fracture recognition by radiologists, or use of ambiguous terminology in reports.[40414243] In most fractures of the pelvic ring, conventional X-rays mainly detect ventral pelvic fractures; therefore, additional CT is necessary to evaluate the dorsal pelvis. Especially in cases in which osteoporotic fracture of the pelvic ring is strongly suspected without an obvious fracture line on conventional X-rays, MRI of the pelvis is of great help and may be a gold standard.[4041] Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are frequently undetected, but their accurate and early diagnosis is of paramount importance because both symptomatic and asymptomatic vertebral fractures are associated with increased morbidity and mortality.[42] Preferentially, conventional X-rays are crucial for diagnosing and grading osteoporotic vertebral deformities and for differential diagnosis during assessment for osteoporotic deformity. However, more advanced imaging techniques such as CT, BS, and MRI may be required to further investigate the etiology in some of these deformities as well as to differentiate chronic from acute fractures, to assess compromise of the spinal canal, and for follow-up after specific treatments such as vertebroplasty.[43]

CONCLUSION

Osteoporotic fractures are a frequent and important cause of disability and medical costs worldwide. Moreover, a number of osteoporotic fractures such as hip and vertebral fractures have very high morbidity and mortality.[28] Prior osteoporotic fracture at any site is one of the strongest risk factors for a new fracture, partly independent of BMD [44]; The new fractures occur very soon after the first fracture. Therefore, early and accurate diagnosis of osteoporotic fractures using the clinical definition, which is applicable practically and independent of BMD, is crucial for preventing subsequent fractures and reducing their associated socioeconomic burden. Fractures caused by low-level trauma equivalent to a fall from a standing height or less at sites described above in adults over age 50, should be first regarded as osteoporotic. In addition, if osteoporotic fractures are strongly suspected on history and physical examination even though there are no positive findings on conventional X-rays, more advanced imaging techniques such as CT, BS, and MRI are required. Subsequently, appropriate treatment should be administered as soon as possible after the diagnosis of the first osteoporotic fracture in order to be most cost-effective.
  42 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: importance of recognition and description by radiologists.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Lee F Rogers; Pierre D Delmas; Harry K Genant
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; B Jonsson; C de Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Cortical bone mineral density versus cortical thickness in the diagnosis of osteoporosis: a roentgenologic-densitometric study.

Authors:  H E Meema; S Meema
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study.

Authors:  Pierre D Delmas; Lex van de Langerijt; Nelson B Watts; Richard Eastell; Harry Genant; Andreas Grauer; David L Cahall
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-12-06       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Low metacarpal index predicts hip fracture: a prospective population study of 3,561 subjects with 15 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Mikko Haara; Markku Heliövaara; Olli Impivaara; Jari P A Arokoski; Pirjo Manninen; Paul Knekt; Alpo Kärkkäinen; Antti Reunanen; Arpo Aromaa; Heikki Kröger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Bone loss and bone size after menopause.

Authors:  Henrik G Ahlborg; Olof Johnell; Charles H Turner; Gunnar Rannevik; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Cortical porosity identifies women with osteopenia at increased risk for forearm fractures.

Authors:  Yohann Bala; Roger Zebaze; Ali Ghasem-Zadeh; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Sandra Iuliano; James M Peterson; Shreyasee Amin; Åshild Bjørnerem; L Joseph Melton; Helena Johansson; John A Kanis; Sundeep Khosla; Ego Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Trend in hip fracture incidence and mortality in Korea: a prospective cohort study from 2002 to 2011.

Authors:  Yong-Chan Ha; Yong-Geun Park; Kwang Woo Nam; Sang-Rim Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 9.  Clinical pathways for fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: personal experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Pol M Rommens; Christian Ossendorf; Philip Pairon; Sven-Oliver Dietz; Daniel Wagner; Alexander Hofmann
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 1.601

10.  National healthcare budget impact analysis of the treatment for osteoporosis and fractures in Korea.

Authors:  Hwabok Yi; Yong-Chan Ha; Young-Kyun Lee; Young-Taik Lim
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2013-05-13
View more
  34 in total

1.  Peripheral DXA measurement around ankle joint to diagnose osteoporosis as assessed by central DXA measurement.

Authors:  Ki Hyuk Sung; Young Choi; Gyeong Hee Cho; Chin Youb Chung; Moon Seok Park; Kyoung Min Lee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The Detrimental Effects of Kynurenine, a Tryptophan Metabolite, on Human Bone Metabolism.

Authors:  Beom-Jun Kim; Mark W Hamrick; Hyun Ju Yoo; Seung Hun Lee; Su Jung Kim; Jung-Min Koh; Carlos M Isales
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Recommendations on the post-acute management of the osteoporotic fracture - Patients with "very-high" Re-fracture risk.

Authors:  Ronald Man Yeung Wong; Wing-Hoi Cheung; Simon Kwoon Ho Chow; Raymond Wai Kit Ng; Wilson Li; Albert Yung-Chak Hsu; Kam Kwong Wong; Angela Wing-Hang Ho; Shing-Hing Choi; Christian Xinshuo Fang; Chun Fung Chan; Ka-Hei Leung; Kwok-Keung Chu; Timothy Chi Yui Kwok; Ming Hui Yang; Maoyi Tian; Sheung Wai Law
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.889

4.  FRAX score with and without bone mineral density: a comparison and factors affecting the discordance in osteoporosis treatment in Thais.

Authors:  Napassorn Teeratakulpisarn; Suranut Charoensri; Daris Theerakulpisut; Chatlert Pongchaiyakul
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  [Short-term effectiveness comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with posterior wall broken].

Authors:  Yongsheng Gou; Haibo Li; Bolin Fu; Zheng Che
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-10-15

6.  Development of a Korean Fracture Risk Score (KFRS) for Predicting Osteoporotic Fracture Risk: Analysis of Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service.

Authors:  Ha Young Kim; Eun Jin Jang; ByeongJu Park; Tae-Young Kim; Soon-Ae Shin; Yong-Chan Ha; Sunmee Jang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Association of Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) Score with Clinical Presentation and Expenditure in Hospitalized Trauma Patients with Femoral Fractures.

Authors:  Chien-Chang Chen; Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Shao-Chun Wu; Pao-Jen Kuo; Yi-Chun Chen; Hsiao-Yun Hsieh; Ching-Hua Hsieh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Epidemiology of Bone Fracture in Female Trauma Patients Based on Risks of Osteoporosis Assessed using the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians Score.

Authors:  Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Shao-Chun Wu; Pao-Jen Kuo; Yi-Chun Chen; Peng-Chen Chien; Hsiao-Yun Hsieh; Ching-Hua Hsieh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Intravenous bisphosphonate therapy does not delay fracture healing in inter-trochanteric femur fractures - A randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Harsh Jalan; Ramesh Perumal; Suresh Prabhu; Sivakumar Palanivelayutham; Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan; S Rajasekaran
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-06-08

Review 10.  Crucial Role of Vitamin D in the Musculoskeletal System.

Authors:  Elke Wintermeyer; Christoph Ihle; Sabrina Ehnert; Ulrich Stöckle; Gunnar Ochs; Peter de Zwart; Ingo Flesch; Christian Bahrs; Andreas K Nussler
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.