Literature DB >> 26712628

Impact of different spray-drying conditions on the viability of wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Maria Aponte1, Gabriele Danilo Troianiello1, Marika Di Capua1, Raffaele Romano1, Giuseppe Blaiotta2.   

Abstract

Spray-drying (SD) is widely considered a suitable method to preserve microorganisms, but data regarding yeasts are still scanty. In this study, the effect of growing media, process variables and carriers over viability of a wild wine Saccharomyces (S.) cerevisiae LM52 was evaluated. For biomass production, the strain was grown (batch and fed-batch fermentation) in a synthetic, as well as in a beet sugar molasses based-medium. Drying of cells resuspended in several combinations of soluble starch and maltose was performed at different inlet and outlet temperatures. Under the best conditions-suspension in soluble starch plus maltose couplet to inlet and outlet temperatures of 110 and 55 °C, respectively-the loss of viability of S. cerevisiae LM52 was 0.8 ± 0.1 and 0.5 ± 0.2 Log c.f.u. g(-1) for synthetic and molasses-based medium, respectively. Similar results were obtained when S. cerevisiae strains Zymoflore F15 and EC1118, isolated from commercial active dry yeast (ADY), were tested. Moreover, powders retained a high vitality and showed good fermentation performances up to 6 month of storage, at both 4 and -20 °C. Finally, fermentation performances of different kinds of dried formulates (SD and ADY) compared with fresh cultures did not show significant differences. The procedure proposed allowed a small-scale production of yeast in continuous operation with relatively simple equipment, and may thus represent a rapid response-on-demand for the production of autochthonous yeasts for local wine-making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autochthonous wine yeast; Fermentative capacity; Formulation; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Spray-drying

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26712628     DOI: 10.1007/s11274-015-1956-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0959-3993            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  Improved survival of Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338 in spray-dried powders containing gum acacia.

Authors:  C Desmond; R P Ross; E O'Callaghan; G Fitzgerald; C Stanton
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.772

2.  Production of ethanol using granulated yeast cells prepared by a spray dryer.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Isono; Akira Hoshino
Journal:  J Gen Appl Microbiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.452

3.  Commercial baker's yeast stability as affected by intracellular content of trehalose, dehydration procedure and the physical properties of external matrices.

Authors:  P Cerrutti; M Segovia de Huergo; M Galvagno; C Schebor; M del Pilar Buera
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Inactivation mechanisms of lactic acid starter cultures preserved by drying processes.

Authors:  C Santivarangkna; U Kulozik; P Foerst
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.772

5.  A low-cost procedure for production of fresh autochthonous wine yeast.

Authors:  Matilde Maqueda; Francisco Pérez-Nevado; José A Regodón; Emiliano Zamora; María L Alvarez; José E Rebollo; Manuel Ramírez
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 6.  Ecological significance of compatible solute accumulation by micro-organisms: from single cells to global climate.

Authors:  D T Welsh
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 16.408

7.  Monitoring stress-related genes during the process of biomass propagation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used for wine making.

Authors:  Roberto Pérez-Torrado; Jose M Bruno-Bárcena; Emilia Matallana
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Identity of the growth-limiting nutrient strongly affects storage carbohydrate accumulation in anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Lucie A Hazelwood; Michael C Walsh; Marijke A H Luttik; Pascale Daran-Lapujade; Jack T Pronk; Jean-Marc Daran
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 4.792

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Microencapsulation by spray drying of coffee epiphytic yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae CCMA 0543 and Torulaspora delbrueckii CCMA 0684.

Authors:  Pâmela Mynsen Machado Martins; Nádia Nara Batista; Líbia Diniz Santos; Disney Ribeiro Dias; Rosane Freitas Schwan
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.214

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.