Literature DB >> 19734328

Identity of the growth-limiting nutrient strongly affects storage carbohydrate accumulation in anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Lucie A Hazelwood1, Michael C Walsh, Marijke A H Luttik, Pascale Daran-Lapujade, Jack T Pronk, Jean-Marc Daran.   

Abstract

Accumulation of glycogen and trehalose in nutrient-limited cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is negatively correlated with the specific growth rate. Additionally, glucose-excess conditions (i.e., growth limitation by nutrients other than glucose) are often implicated in high-level accumulation of these storage carbohydrates. The present study investigates how the identity of the growth-limiting nutrient affects accumulation of storage carbohydrates in cultures grown at a fixed specific growth rate. In anaerobic chemostat cultures (dilution rate, 0.10 h(-1)) of S. cerevisiae, the identity of the growth-limiting nutrient (glucose, ammonia, sulfate, phosphate, or zinc) strongly affected storage carbohydrate accumulation. The glycogen contents of the biomass from glucose- and ammonia-limited cultures were 10- to 14-fold higher than those of the biomass from cultures grown under the other three glucose-excess regimens. Trehalose levels were specifically higher under nitrogen-limited conditions. These results demonstrate that storage carbohydrate accumulation in nutrient-limited cultures of S. cerevisiae is not a generic response to excess glucose but instead is strongly dependent on the identity of the growth-limiting nutrient. While transcriptome analysis of wild-type and msn2Delta msn4Delta strains confirmed that transcriptional upregulation of glycogen and trehalose biosynthesis genes is mediated by Msn2p/Msn4p, transcriptional regulation could not quantitatively account for the drastic changes in storage carbohydrate accumulation. The results of assays of glycogen synthase and glycogen phosphorylase activities supported involvement of posttranscriptional regulation. Consistent with the high glycogen levels in ammonia-limited cultures, the ratio of glycogen synthase to glycogen phosphorylase in these cultures was up to eightfold higher than the ratio in the other glucose-excess cultures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19734328      PMCID: PMC2772451          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01464-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  81 in total

1.  Yeast glycogen synthetase in the glucose 6-phosphate-dependent form. II. The effect of proteolysis.

Authors:  K P Huang; E Cabib
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1974-06-25       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Yeast glycogen synthetase in the glucose 6-phosphate-dependent form. I. Purification and properties.

Authors:  K P Huang; E Cabib
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1974-06-25       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Changes in carbohydrate composition and trehalase-activity during the budding cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M T Küenzi; A Fiechter
Journal:  Arch Mikrobiol       Date:  1969

4.  Two forms of yeast glycogen synthetase and their role in glycogen accumulation.

Authors:  L B Rothman-Denes; E Cabib
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Changes in the concentration of cAMP, fructose 2,6-bisphosphate and related metabolites and enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during growth on glucose.

Authors:  J François; P Eraso; C Gancedo
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1987-04-15

6.  Role of reserve carbohydrates in the growth dynamics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Vincent Guillou; Lucile Plourde-Owobi; Jean Luc Parrou; Gerard Goma; Jean François
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome.

Authors:  Christopher T Harbison; D Benjamin Gordon; Tong Ihn Lee; Nicola J Rinaldi; Kenzie D Macisaac; Timothy W Danford; Nancy M Hannett; Jean-Bosco Tagne; David B Reynolds; Jane Yoo; Ezra G Jennings; Julia Zeitlinger; Dmitry K Pokholok; Manolis Kellis; P Alex Rolfe; Ken T Takusagawa; Eric S Lander; David K Gifford; Ernest Fraenkel; Richard A Young
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Combinatorial control by the protein kinases PKA, PHO85 and SNF1 of transcriptional induction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GSY2 gene at the diauxic shift.

Authors:  B Enjalbert; J L Parrou; M A Teste; J François
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 3.291

9.  Reserve carbohydrate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: responses to nutrient limitation.

Authors:  S H Lillie; J R Pringle
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Ras and Gpa2 mediate one branch of a redundant glucose signaling pathway in yeast.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Michael Pierce; Lisa Schneper; C Gökçe Güldal; Xiuying Zhang; Saeed Tavazoie; James R Broach
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  14 in total

1.  The renaissance of continuous culture in the post-genomics age.

Authors:  Alan T Bull
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  In Vivo Analysis of NH4+ Transport and Central Nitrogen Metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during Aerobic Nitrogen-Limited Growth.

Authors:  H F Cueto-Rojas; R Maleki Seifar; A Ten Pierick; W van Helmond; M M Pieterse; J J Heijnen; S A Wahl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Impact of different spray-drying conditions on the viability of wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  Maria Aponte; Gabriele Danilo Troianiello; Marika Di Capua; Raffaele Romano; Giuseppe Blaiotta
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Biosynthetic and iron metabolism is regulated by thiol proteome changes dependent on glutaredoxin-2 and mitochondrial peroxiredoxin-1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Brian McDonagh; C Alicia Padilla; José Rafael Pedrajas; José Antonio Bárcena
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Physiological and transcriptional responses of anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae subjected to diurnal temperature cycles.

Authors:  Marit Hebly; Dick de Ridder; Erik A F de Hulster; Pilar de la Torre Cortes; Jack T Pronk; Pascale Daran-Lapujade
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Quantitative Physiology of Non-Energy-Limited Retentostat Cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at Near-Zero Specific Growth Rates.

Authors:  Yaya Liu; Anissa El Masoudi; Jack T Pronk; Walter M van Gulik
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Unravelling evolutionary strategies of yeast for improving galactose utilization through integrated systems level analysis.

Authors:  Kuk-Ki Hong; Wanwipa Vongsangnak; Goutham N Vemuri; Jens Nielsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Detection of transcriptional triggers in the dynamics of microbial growth: application to the respiratorily versatile bacterium Shewanella oneidensis.

Authors:  Qasim K Beg; Mattia Zampieri; Niels Klitgord; Sara B Collins; Claudio Altafini; Margrethe H Serres; Daniel Segrè
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Cellular responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at near-zero growth rates: transcriptome analysis of anaerobic retentostat cultures.

Authors:  Léonie G M Boender; Antonius J A van Maris; Erik A F de Hulster; Marinka J H Almering; Ida J van der Klei; Marten Veenhuis; Johannes H de Winde; Jack T Pronk; Pascale Daran-Lapujade
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Nutrient control of eukaryote cell growth: a systems biology study in yeast.

Authors:  Alex Gutteridge; Pinar Pir; Juan I Castrillo; Philip D Charles; Kathryn S Lilley; Stephen G Oliver
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.