Claire M Peterson1, Jessica H Baker2, Laura M Thornton2, Sara E Trace2, Suzanne E Mazzeo3, Michael C Neale4, Melissa A Munn-Chernoff2, Paul Lichtenstein5, Nancy L Pedersen5,6, Cynthia M Bulik2,5,7. 1. Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 3. Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia. 4. Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia. 5. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 6. Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. 7. Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North California.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We examined the association between the genetic and environmental factors contributing to the liability to having ever engaged in self-induced vomiting (SIV initiation) and the genetic and environmental factors contributing to regular SIV behaviors (weekly or daily) for weight control. METHOD: SIV was assessed in 3,942 women from monozygotic twin pairs and 2,790 women from same-sex dizygotic twin pairs, aged 20-47, from the Swedish Twin study of Adults: Genes and Environment. A causal-contingent-common pathway model assessed the extent to which genetic and environmental factors that influence initiation of SIV also influence regular SIV behaviors. RESULTS: In the best-fit model, genetic and individual-specific environmental factors influenced liability to SIV initiation. The genetic factors influencing regular SIV behaviors were the same as the genetic factors influencing SIV initiation. Additional individual-specific environmental factors that were unrelated to SIV initiation influenced regular SIV behaviors. DISCUSSION: Our findings provide evidence that the underlying liabilities for SIV initiation and regular SIV lie on the same continuum given the degree of overlap in risk between SIV initiation and regular SIV behaviors. Further, the lack of specific genetic factors and the importance of individual-specific environmental factors for regular SIV behaviors highlight the significance of environmental factors in the etiology of eating disorder symptomatology and the non-deterministic nature of genetic factors. Finally, our results suggest that when it comes to preventing individuals from developing regular SIV behavior, intervening at an environmental level is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: We examined the association between the genetic and environmental factors contributing to the liability to having ever engaged in self-induced vomiting (SIV initiation) and the genetic and environmental factors contributing to regular SIV behaviors (weekly or daily) for weight control. METHOD:SIV was assessed in 3,942 women from monozygotic twin pairs and 2,790 women from same-sex dizygotic twin pairs, aged 20-47, from the Swedish Twin study of Adults: Genes and Environment. A causal-contingent-common pathway model assessed the extent to which genetic and environmental factors that influence initiation of SIV also influence regular SIV behaviors. RESULTS: In the best-fit model, genetic and individual-specific environmental factors influenced liability to SIV initiation. The genetic factors influencing regular SIV behaviors were the same as the genetic factors influencing SIV initiation. Additional individual-specific environmental factors that were unrelated to SIV initiation influenced regular SIV behaviors. DISCUSSION: Our findings provide evidence that the underlying liabilities for SIV initiation and regular SIV lie on the same continuum given the degree of overlap in risk between SIV initiation and regular SIV behaviors. Further, the lack of specific genetic factors and the importance of individual-specific environmental factors for regular SIV behaviors highlight the significance of environmental factors in the etiology of eating disorder symptomatology and the non-deterministic nature of genetic factors. Finally, our results suggest that when it comes to preventing individuals from developing regular SIV behavior, intervening at an environmental level is warranted.
Authors: Melissa A Munn-Chernoff; Julia D Grant; Arpana Agrawal; Carolyn E Sartor; Kimberly B Werner; Kathleen K Bucholz; Pamela A F Madden; Andrew C Heath; Alexis E Duncan Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Melissa A Munn-Chernoff; Pamela K Keel; Kelly L Klump; Julia D Grant; Kathleen K Bucholz; Pamela A F Madden; Andrew C Heath; Alexis E Duncan Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Debra L Franko; Aparna Keshaviah; Kamryn T Eddy; Meera Krishna; Martha C Davis; Pamela K Keel; David B Herzog Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Melissa A Munn-Chernoff; Kristin M von Ranson; Kristen M Culbert; Christine L Larson; S Alexandra Burt; Kelly L Klump Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Melissa A Munn-Chernoff; Alexis E Duncan; Julia D Grant; Tracey D Wade; Arpana Agrawal; Kathleen K Bucholz; Pamela A F Madden; Nicholas G Martin; Andrew C Heath Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Tom Fowler; Kate Lifford; Katherine Shelton; Frances Rice; Anita Thapar; Michael C Neale; Andrew McBride; Marianne B M van den Bree Journal: Addiction Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 6.526